Chondrocyte phenotype in engineered fibrous matrix is regulated by fiber size.

A biomaterial scaffold acting as a functional substitute for the native extracellular matrix provides space for cell accommodation. In this study, we seeded chondrocytes, isolated from 4- to 6-month-old calves, in 2 types of poly(L-lactide) scaffolds, composed of micro- and nanofibers, and compared the effects on cellular activities. Scanning electron microscopy revealed a well-spread morphology for chondrocytes grown on microfibers. In contrast, chondrocytes on the nanofibers were found to have a rounded morphology and displayed a disorganized actin cytoskeletal structure compared to the organized cytoskeleton seen in well-spread chondrocytes culture on the microfibrous scaffold. Both scaffolds supported chondrocyte proliferation, with a higher rate seen in cultures in nanofibrous scaffold. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis showed that both cultures supported expression of collagen types I and II and aggrecan. Biochemical analysis showed a higher level of sulfated glycosaminoglycan in the nanofiber culture, confirmed by more intense alcian blue histologic staining. The nanofiber cultures also showed higher immunostaining for collagen types II and IX, aggrecan, and cartilage proteoglycan link protein. Based on these results, we conclude that chondrocytes respond differently to fibrous scaffolds of varying diameters, and that the scaffolds made of nanofibrous biomaterial promote efficient cell-based cartilage tissue engineering.

[1]  R. Tuan,et al.  Surface composition of orthopaedic implant metals regulates cell attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization of primary human osteoblasts in vitro. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  A. Pennings,et al.  Porous polymer implant for repair of meniscal lesions: a preliminary study in dogs. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[3]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cytoskeletal filament assembly and the control of cell spreading and function by extracellular matrix. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[4]  H. Takita,et al.  Geometry of Carriers Controlling Phenotypic Expression in BMP-Induced Osteogenesis and Chondrogenesis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[6]  Shuguang Zhang Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  J. Ralphs,et al.  Organisation of the chondrocyte cytoskeleton and its response to changing mechanical conditions in organ culture , 1999, Journal of anatomy.

[8]  T. Webster,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[9]  J. Abbott,et al.  THE LOSS OF PHENOTYPIC TRAITS BY DIFFERENTIATED CELLS , 1966, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Horst Kessler,et al.  RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[11]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[12]  A Curtis,et al.  Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[13]  R. Hynes Cell adhesion: old and new questions , 1999 .

[14]  A S G Curtis,et al.  In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[15]  Jonathan Bard,et al.  COLLAGEN SUBSTRATA FOR STUDIES ON CELL BEHAVIOR , 1972, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  R Langer,et al.  Neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo using cells cultured on synthetic biodegradable polymers. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  R. Kandel,et al.  Effect of material geometry on cartilagenous tissue formation in vitro. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[19]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[20]  D. Kniss,et al.  Three-dimensional cell-scaffold constructs promote efficient gene transfection: implications for cell-based gene therapy. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[21]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[22]  U. Aebi,et al.  The Chondrocyte Cytoskeleton in Mature Articular Cartilage: Structure and Distribution of Actin, Tubulin, and Vimentin Filaments , 2000, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[23]  R. Tuan,et al.  A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[24]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[25]  D. Buttle,et al.  Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. , 1986, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[26]  R Langer,et al.  Chondrogenesis in a cell-polymer-bioreactor system. , 1998, Experimental cell research.

[27]  G. Ateshian,et al.  The role of cell seeding density and nutrient supply for articular cartilage tissue engineering with deformational loading. , 2003, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[28]  N. Boudreau,et al.  Extracellular matrix and integrin signalling: the shape of things to come. , 1999, The Biochemical journal.

[29]  P. Benya,et al.  Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels , 1982, Cell.

[30]  Yasuhiko Tabata,et al.  Effect of the fiber diameter and porosity of non-woven PET fabrics on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2004, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[31]  P. D. Di Cesare,et al.  Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  R. Tuan,et al.  Regulation of MMP-13 expression by RUNX2 and FGF2 in osteoarthritic cartilage. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[33]  R. Tuan,et al.  Regulation of human osteoblast integrin expression by orthopedic implant materials. , 1996, Bone.

[34]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[35]  Martin Bastmeyer,et al.  Cell behaviour on micropatterned substrata: limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[36]  Robert Langer,et al.  Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 1994, Bio/Technology.

[37]  K. Leong,et al.  The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[38]  Wan-Ju Li,et al.  Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nanofibrous poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds† , 2003 .

[39]  C. E. Stiles,et al.  Tissue response to single-polymer fibers of varying diameters: evaluation of fibrous encapsulation and macrophage density. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[40]  F. Rosso,et al.  From Cell–ECM interactions to tissue engineering , 2004, Journal of cellular physiology.

[41]  H. Lee,et al.  Cell behaviour on polymer surfaces with different functional groups , 1994 .