Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study

Objective: To assess the efficacy of motor imagery training for arm function in chronic stroke patients. The relation between mental processes such as attentional and perceived personal control over recovery, and motor imagery was additionally investigated. Design and subjects: Twenty patients with long-term motor impairments (mean two years post stroke), were assessed before and after four weeks of training. Ten patients mentally rehearsed movements with their affected arm. Their recovery was compared with patients who performed nonmotor imagery (n =5), or who were not engaged in mental rehearsal (n =5). Setting: Patients were recruited from the stroke database of Ninewells Hospital, Dundee. Assessment and training were performed at the patients' home. Interventions: The motor imagery group was asked to practise daily imagining moving tokens with their affected arm. The nonmotor imagery group rehearsed visual imagery of previously seen pictures. All patients practised physically moving the tokens. Main measures: The following variables were assessed before and after training: motor function (training task, pegboard and dynamometer), perceived locus of control, attention control and ADL independence. Results: All patient groups improved on all motor tasks except the dynamometer. Improvement was greater for the motor imagery group on the training task only (average of 14% versus 6%). No effect of motor imagery training was found on perceived or attentional control. Conclusions: Motor imagery training without supervision at home may improve performance on the trained task only. The relation between movement imagery, attention and perceived personal control over recovery remained unclear.

[1]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[2]  B Milner,et al.  Somatosensory thresholds--contrasting effects of postcentral-gyrus and posterior parietal-lobe excisions. , 1970, Archives of neurology.

[3]  D. Landers,et al.  The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. , 1983 .

[4]  R. Snaith,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale , 1983 .

[5]  R L Hewer,et al.  Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  R. Snaith,et al.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale. , 2013, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[7]  D. Wade,et al.  Stroke: associations with age, sex, and side of weakness. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  A. Sunderland,et al.  Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  R L Hewer,et al.  Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[10]  M L Niemi,et al.  Quality of life 4 years after stroke. , 1988, Stroke.

[11]  D. Tinson,et al.  How stroke patients spend their days. An observational study of the treatment regime offered to patients in hospital with movement disorders following stroke. , 1989, International disability studies.

[12]  M. Johnston,et al.  Perceived control of recovery from physical disability: measurement and prediction. , 1989, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[13]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Chamberlain,et al.  Improving social outcome after stroke: an evaluation of the volunteer stroke scheme , 1994 .

[15]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography , 1994, Nature.

[16]  C. Weiller Recovery from Motor Stroke: Human Positron Emission Tomography Studies , 1995 .

[17]  Y Agid,et al.  Congruent unilateral impairments for real and imagined hand movements , 1995, Neuroreport.

[18]  A. Sirigu,et al.  The Mental Representation of Hand Movements After Parietal Cortex Damage , 1996, Science.

[19]  Dijkerman Hc,et al.  Long-term outcome after discharge from a stroke rehabilitation unit. , 1996 .

[20]  R. Hewer,et al.  Long-Term Outcome after Discharge from a Stroke Rehabilitation Unit , 1996, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[21]  I. Nimmo-Smith,et al.  The structure of normal human attention: The Test of Everyday Attention , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[22]  I. Robertson,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: a 2-year follow-up study. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[23]  M. Johnston,et al.  Perceived control, coping and recovery from disability following stroke , 1999 .

[24]  Chiang-shan Ray Li,et al.  Impairment of motor imagery in putamen lesions in humans , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  S. Page,et al.  Imagery Improves Upper Extremity Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study , 2000 .

[26]  Scott H. Johnson,et al.  Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics , 2000, Neuroreport.

[27]  S. Page,et al.  A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[28]  C. Richards,et al.  Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  F. Binkofski,et al.  Recovery of Motor Functions following Hemiparetic Stroke: A Clinical and Magnetic Resonance-Morphometric Study , 2001, Cerebrovascular Diseases.