Dispersion and Mixing in Three‐Dimensional Discrete Fracture Networks: Nonlinear Interplay Between Structural and Hydraulic Heterogeneity

We investigate the relative impact of topological, geometric, and hydraulic heterogeneity on transport processes in three-dimensional fracture networks. Focusing on the two largest scales of heterogeneity in these systems, individual fracture and network structure, we compare transport through analogous structured and disordered three-dimensional fracture networks with varying degrees of hydraulic heterogeneity. For the moderate levels of hydraulic heterogeneity we consider, network structure is the dominant control of transport through the networks. Less dispersion, both longitudinal and transverse, is observed in structured networks than in disordered networks, due in part to the higher connectivity in the former, independent of the level of hydraulic heterogeneity. However, increases in dispersion with higher hydraulic heterogeneity are larger in the disordered networks than in the structured networks, thereby indicating that the interplay between structural and hydraulic heterogeneity is nonlinear. We propose a measure of disorder in fracture networks by computing the Shannon entropy of the spectrum of the Laplacian of a weighted graph representation of the networks, where the weights are given by a combination of topological, geometric, and hydraulic properties. This metric, as a relative indicator by comparison between two networks, is a first approach to the dispersion potential and ‘‘mixing capacity’’ of a fracture network.

[1]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Fluid flow and mixing in rough-walled fracture intersections , 2006 .

[2]  Kassem Mustapha,et al.  A New Approach to Simulating Flow in Discrete Fracture Networks with an Optimized Mesh , 2007, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Theory of anomalous chemical transport in random fracture networks , 1998 .

[4]  A. Fiori,et al.  Analysis of the impact of injection mode in transport through strongly heterogeneous aquifers , 2010 .

[5]  Wendy D. Graham,et al.  Injection mode implications for solute transport in porous media: Analysis in a stochastic Lagrangian Framework , 1999 .

[6]  Jeffrey D. Hyman,et al.  Conforming Delaunay Triangulation of Stochastically Generated Three Dimensional Discrete Fracture Networks: A Feature Rejection Algorithm for Meshing Strategy , 2014, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[7]  C. Tsang,et al.  Flow channeling in heterogeneous fractured rocks , 1998 .

[8]  Chin-Fu Tsang,et al.  Flow channeling in a single fracture as a two‐dimensional strongly heterogeneous permeable medium , 1989 .

[9]  V. Cvetkovic,et al.  Significance of higher moments for complete characterization of the travel time probability density function in heterogeneous porous media using the maximum entropy principle , 2010 .

[10]  C. Fidelibus,et al.  Derivation of equivalent pipe network analogues for three‐dimensional discrete fracture networks by the boundary element method , 1999 .

[11]  Georg Kosakowski,et al.  Transport behavior in three‐dimensional fracture intersections , 2003 .

[12]  Satish Karra,et al.  PFLOTRAN User Manual A Massively Parallel Reactive Flow and Transport Model for Describing Surface and Subsurface Processes , 2015 .

[13]  Rajat Gupta,et al.  Applied Hydrogeology of Fractured Rocks , 1999 .

[14]  Marco Dentz,et al.  Anomalous dispersion in correlated porous media: a coupled continuous time random walk approach , 2017, 1707.05560.

[15]  Emmanuel Ledoux,et al.  Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: Calibration and validation: 2. The transport model , 1990 .

[16]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  ANOMALOUS TRANSPORT IN RANDOM FRACTURE NETWORKS , 1997 .

[17]  J. Feyen,et al.  Solute transport in a heterogeneous soil for boundary and initial conditions: Evaluation of first‐order approximations , 1998 .

[18]  H. S. Viswanathan,et al.  Understanding hydraulic fracturing: a multi-scale problem , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Marco Bianchi,et al.  Geological entropy and solute transport in heterogeneous porous media , 2017 .

[20]  Hillel Rubin,et al.  Transverse dispersion of contaminants in fractured permeable formations , 1996 .

[21]  L. Aquilina,et al.  High-yielding aquifers in crystalline basement: insights about the role of fault zones, exemplified by Armorican Massif, France , 2016, Hydrogeology Journal.

[22]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  PERCOLATION THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION TO GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY , 1993 .

[23]  Carl W. Gable,et al.  Pathline tracing on fully unstructured control-volume grids , 2012, Computational Geosciences.

[24]  N. Odling,et al.  Scaling of fracture systems in geological media , 2001 .

[25]  Satish Karra,et al.  Particle tracking approach for transport in three-dimensional discrete fracture networks , 2015, Computational Geosciences.

[26]  X. Sanchez‐Vila,et al.  Representative hydraulic conductivities in saturated groundwater flow , 2006 .

[27]  A. Zuber,et al.  On the physical meaning of the dispersion equation and its solutions for different initial and boundary conditions , 1978 .

[28]  Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy,et al.  Influence of spatial correlation of fracture centers on the permeability of two‐dimensional fracture networks following a power law length distribution , 2004 .

[29]  Andreas Englert,et al.  Mixing, spreading and reaction in heterogeneous media: a brief review. , 2011, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[30]  Pierre M. Adler,et al.  Dispersion in three-dimensional fracture networks , 2001 .

[31]  Ruben Juanes,et al.  Emergence of Anomalous Transport in Stressed Rough Fractures , 2015 .

[32]  Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez,et al.  Eigenvector centrality for geometric and topological characterization of porous media. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[33]  Lenka Zdeborová,et al.  Percolation on sparse networks , 2014, Physical review letters.

[34]  Gowri Srinivasan,et al.  Predictions of first passage times in sparse discrete fracture networks using graph-based reductions. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[36]  Scott L. Painter,et al.  Stochastic simulation of radionuclide migration in discretely fractured rock near the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory , 2004 .

[37]  A. Wood Simulation of the von mises fisher distribution , 1994 .

[38]  Paul A. Witherspoon,et al.  The relationship of the degree of interconnection to permeability in fracture networks , 1985 .

[39]  Satish Karra,et al.  Fracture size and transmissivity correlations: Implications for transport simulations in sparse three‐dimensional discrete fracture networks following a truncated power law distribution of fracture size , 2016 .

[40]  Satish Karra,et al.  Influence of injection mode on transport properties in kilometer‐scale three‐dimensional discrete fracture networks , 2015 .

[41]  Ruben Juanes,et al.  Anomalous transport in disordered fracture networks: Spatial Markov model for dispersion with variable injection modes , 2017, 1704.02762.

[42]  A. Journel,et al.  Entropy and spatial disorder , 1993 .

[43]  Significance of injection modes and heterogeneity on spatial and temporal dispersion of advecting particles in two-dimensional discrete fracture networks , 2009 .

[44]  Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy,et al.  A Generalized Mixed Hybrid Mortar Method for Solving Flow in Stochastic Discrete Fracture Networks , 2012, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[45]  J. Erhel,et al.  A mixed hybrid Mortar method for solving flow in discrete fracture networks , 2010 .

[46]  Chin-Fu Tsang,et al.  Tracer transport in a stochastic continuum model of fractured media , 1996 .

[47]  Ruben Juanes,et al.  Anomalous transport on regular fracture networks: Impact of conductivity heterogeneity and mixing at fracture intersections. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy,et al.  Flow Simulation in Three-Dimensional Discrete Fracture Networks , 2009, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[49]  Aric Hagberg,et al.  Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX , 2008, Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference.

[50]  Satish Karra,et al.  Evaluating the effect of internal aperture variability on transport in kilometer scale discrete fracture networks , 2016 .

[51]  Albert J. Valocchi,et al.  Using dispersivity values to quantify the effects of pore-scale flow focusing on enhanced reaction along a transverse mixing zone , 2010 .

[52]  Young-Jin Park,et al.  Influence of Fracture Connectivity and Characterization Level on the Uncertainty of the Equivalent Permeability in Statistically Conceptualized Fracture Networks , 2011 .

[53]  L. Longuevergne,et al.  Temporal and spatial scaling of hydraulic response to recharge in fractured aquifers: Insights from a frequency domain analysis , 2013 .

[54]  Satish Karra,et al.  dfnWorks: A discrete fracture network framework for modeling subsurface flow and transport , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[55]  Enrico Barbier,et al.  Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview , 2002 .

[56]  Géraldine Pichot,et al.  Influence of fracture scale heterogeneity on the flow properties of three-dimensional discrete fracture networks (DFN) , 2012 .

[57]  Chin-Fu Tsang,et al.  Flow and tracer transport in a single fracture: A stochastic model and its relation to some field observations , 1988 .

[58]  M. Cacas Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: Calibration and validation - 1 , 1990 .

[59]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  The concept of the Dilution Index , 1994 .

[60]  Daniel R. Lester,et al.  Continuous Time Random Walks for the Evolution of Lagrangian Velocities , 2016, 1608.02208.

[61]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Flow and travel time statistics in highly heterogeneous porous media , 2009 .