Synaptic sampling: A connection between PSP variability and uncertainty explains neurophysiological observations

When an action potential is transmitted to a postsynaptic neuron, a small change in the postsynaptic neuron's membrane potential occurs. These small changes, known as a postsynaptic potentials (PSPs), are highly variable, and current models assume that this variability is corrupting noise. In contrast, we show that this variability could have an important computational role: representing a synapse's uncertainty about the optimal synaptic weight (i.e. the best possible setting for the synaptic weight). We show that this link between uncertainty and variability, that we call synaptic sampling, leads to more accurate estimates of the uncertainty in task relevant quantities, leading to more effective decision making. Synaptic sampling makes four predictions, all of which have some experimental support. First the more variable a synapse is, the more it should change during LTP protocols. Second, variability should increase as the presynpatic firing rate falls. Third, PSP variance should be proportional to PSP mean. Fourth, variability should increase with distance from the cell soma. We provide support for the first two predictions by reanalysing existing datasets, and we find preexisting data in support of the last two predictions.

[1]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Multiple forms of long-term plasticity at unitary neocortical layer 5 synapses , 2007, Neuropharmacology.

[2]  P. Berkes,et al.  Statistically Optimal Perception and Learning: from Behavior to Neural Representations , 2022 .

[3]  Simon B. Laughlin,et al.  Energy-Efficient Coding with Discrete Stochastic Events , 2002, Neural Computation.

[4]  C. Clopath,et al.  The emergence of functional microcircuits in visual cortex , 2013, Nature.

[5]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[6]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Special issue on “Probabilistic models of cognition , 2022 .

[7]  L. Abbott,et al.  Redundancy Reduction and Sustained Firing with Stochastic Depressing Synapses , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Bayesian synaptic plasticity makes predictions about plasticity experiments in vivo , 2014 .

[9]  P. Dean,et al.  The cerebellar microcircuit as an adaptive filter: experimental and computational evidence , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Mark S. Goldman,et al.  Enhancement of Information Transmission Efficiency by Synaptic Failures , 2004, Neural Computation.

[11]  J. Rothwell Principles of Neural Science , 1982 .

[12]  J. J. Denier van der Gon,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information , 1999 .

[13]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[14]  T. Branco,et al.  The probability of neurotransmitter release: variability and feedback control at single synapses , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Rate, Timing, and Cooperativity Jointly Determine Cortical Synaptic Plasticity , 2001, Neuron.

[16]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Interpreting Neural Response Variability as Monte Carlo Sampling of the Posterior , 2002, NIPS.

[19]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Fast nonnegative deconvolution for spike train inference from population calcium imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  George Casella,et al.  A Short History of Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Subjective Recollections from Incomplete Data , 2008, 0808.2902.

[21]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  David C. Knill,et al.  Surface orientation from texture: ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues , 1998, Vision Research.

[23]  József Fiser,et al.  Spontaneous Cortical Activity Reveals Hallmarks of an Optimal Internal Model of the Environment , 2011, Science.

[24]  Sen Song,et al.  Highly Nonrandom Features of Synaptic Connectivity in Local Cortical Circuits , 2005, PLoS biology.

[25]  David M. Sobel,et al.  A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. , 2004, Psychological review.

[26]  A. Pouget,et al.  Marginalization in Neural Circuits with Divisive Normalization , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning , 2022 .

[28]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Probabilistic Population Codes for Bayesian Decision Making , 2008, Neuron.

[29]  William B Levy,et al.  Energy-Efficient Neuronal Computation via Quantal Synaptic Failures , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.