Using genetic programming to transform from Australian to USDA/FAO soil particle-size classification system

The difference between the International (adopted by Australia) and the USDA/FAO particle-size classification systems is the limit between silt and sand fractions (20 μm for the International and 50 µm for the USDA/FAO). In order to work with pedotransfer functions generated under the USDA/FAO system with Australian soil survey data, a conversion should be attempted. The aim of this work is to improve prior models using larger datasets and a genetic programming technique, in the form of a symbolic regression. The 2–50 µm fraction was predicted using a USDA dataset which included both particle-size classification systems. The presented model reduced the root mean square error (%) by 14.96 and 23.62% (IGBP-DIS dataset and Australian dataset, respectively), compared with the previous model.

[1]  A. Johari,et al.  Prediction of Soil-Water Characteristic Curve Using Genetic Programming , 2006 .

[2]  S. S. Rousseva,et al.  Data transformations between soil texture schemes , 1997 .

[3]  Peter Droogers,et al.  Combining remote sensing-simulation modeling and genetic algorithm optimization to explore water management options in irrigated agriculture , 2006 .

[4]  G. Buchan,et al.  APPLICABILITY OF THE SIMPLE LOGNORMAL MODEL TO PARTICLE‐SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS , 1989 .

[5]  Niels H. Batjes,et al.  IGBP-DIS soil data set for pedotransfer function development , 1996 .

[6]  Amin Elshorbagy,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of the evapotranspiration process using genetic programming , 2007 .

[7]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic Programming III: Darwinian Invention & Problem Solving , 1999 .

[8]  Nitin Muttil,et al.  Testing the Structure of Hydrological Models using Genetic Programming , 2011 .

[9]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection , 1993, Complex adaptive systems.

[10]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Soil moisture estimation in a semiarid watershed using RADARSAT‐1 satellite imagery and genetic programming , 2006 .

[11]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Comparison of different approaches to the development of pedotransfer functions for water-retention curves , 1999 .

[12]  Amin Elshorbagy,et al.  Estimating Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Using Genetic Programming , 2007 .

[13]  R. K. Jana,et al.  Fuzzy goal programming based genetic algorithm approach to nutrient management for rice crop planning , 2009 .

[14]  Larry Boersma,et al.  A unifying quantitative analysis of soil texture: Improvement of precision and extension of scale , 1988 .

[15]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  The australian soil texture boomerang: a comparison of the Australian and USDA/FAO soil particle-size classification systems , 2001 .