Comparing niche- and process-based models to reduce prediction uncertainty in species range shifts under climate change.

Obtaining reliable predictions of species range shifts under climate change is a crucial challenge for ecologists and stakeholders. At the continental scale, niche-based models have been widely used in the last 10 years to predict the potential impacts of climate change on species distributions all over the world, although these models do not include any mechanistic relationships. In contrast, species-specific, process-based predictions remain scarce at the continental scale. This is regrettable because to secure relevant and accurate predictions it is always desirable to compare predictions derived from different kinds of models applied independently to the same set of species and using the same raw data. Here we compare predictions of range shifts under climate change scenarios for 2100 derived from niche-based models with those of a process-based model for 15 North American boreal and temperate tree species. A general pattern emerged from our comparisons: niche-based models tend to predict a stronger level of extinction and a greater proportion of colonization than the process-based model. This result likely arises because niche-based models do not take phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation into account. Nevertheless, as the two kinds of models rely on different assumptions, their complementarity is revealed by common findings. Both modeling approaches highlight a major potential limitation on species tracking their climatic niche because of migration constraints and identify similar zones where species extirpation is likely. Such convergent predictions from models built on very different principles provide a useful way to offset uncertainties at the continental scale. This study shows that the use in concert of both approaches with their own caveats and advantages is crucial to obtain more robust results and that comparisons among models are needed in the near future to gain accuracy regarding predictions of range shifts under climate change.

[1]  M. Araújo,et al.  BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions , 2009 .

[2]  Mathieu Marmion,et al.  Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling , 2009 .

[3]  T. Lovejoy Climate change and biodiversity. , 2008, Revue scientifique et technique.

[4]  I. Chuine,et al.  Tree species range shifts at a continental scale: new predictive insights from a process‐based model , 2008 .

[5]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space , 2008 .

[6]  Monika Schwager,et al.  The state of plant population modelling in light of environmental change , 2008 .

[7]  M. Sykes,et al.  Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions: Future challenges , 2008 .

[8]  C. Augspurger,et al.  Process-based modeling of species' distributions: what limits temperate tree species' range boundaries? , 2007, Ecology.

[9]  W. Thuiller Biodiversity: Climate change and the ecologist , 2007, Nature.

[10]  A. Pitman,et al.  Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modelling into projections of species distributions , 2007 .

[11]  David J. Mladenoff,et al.  Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution , 2007 .

[12]  M. Power,et al.  Species Interactions Reverse Grassland Responses to Changing Climate , 2007, Science.

[13]  K. J. Willis,et al.  The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions , 2007 .

[14]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Plant Species Migration as a Key Uncertainty in Predicting Future Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystems: Progress and Challenges , 2007 .

[16]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[17]  D. Richardson,et al.  Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions , 2007 .

[18]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[19]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  TreeMig: A forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale , 2006 .

[20]  C. Parmesan Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change , 2006 .

[21]  Rik Leemans,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. , 2006 .

[22]  M. Zappa,et al.  Are niche‐based species distribution models transferable in space? , 2006 .

[23]  M. Araújo,et al.  Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe , 2006 .

[24]  S. Hartley,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in the potential distribution of an invasive species: climate and the Argentine ant. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[25]  Emmanuel S. Gritti,et al.  Quantifying components of risk for European woody species under climate change , 2006 .

[26]  R. Briers,et al.  Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems , 2006 .

[27]  Greg Hughes,et al.  Migration rate limitations on climate change‐induced range shifts in Cape Proteaceae , 2006 .

[28]  Ran Nathan Long-Distance Dispersal of Plants , 2006, Science.

[29]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Modelling Regional Climate Change Effects On Potential Natural Ecosystems in Sweden , 2006 .

[30]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change: a review of the methods* , 2006 .

[31]  D. Richardson,et al.  Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility , 2006 .

[32]  G. Midgley,et al.  Do geographic distribution, niche property and life form explain plants' vulnerability to global change? , 2006 .

[33]  B. Mccarthy Species Invasions: Insights into Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeography , 2006 .

[34]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[35]  R. Ahas,et al.  Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere , 2006 .

[36]  W. I L F R I E D T H U I L L E,et al.  Endemic species and ecosystem sensitivity to climate change in Namibia , 2006 .

[37]  José M. V. Fragoso,et al.  Forecasting Regional to Global Plant Migration in Response to Climate Change , 2005 .

[38]  Isabelle Chuine,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of the tree distribution model Phenofit to climatic input characteristics: implications for climate impact assessment , 2005 .

[39]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[40]  D. Richardson,et al.  Potential impacts of future land use and climate change on the Red List status of the Proteaceae in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa , 2005 .

[41]  R. Siegwolf,et al.  Carbon Flux and Growth in Mature Deciduous Forest Trees Exposed to Elevated CO2 , 2005, Science.

[42]  Gian-Reto Walther,et al.  An ecological ‘footprint’ of climate change , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  M. Sykes,et al.  Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  T. Blackburn,et al.  The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  D. Mladenoff,et al.  A spatially interactive simulation of climate change, harvesting, wind, and tree species migration and projected changes to forest composition and biomass in northern Wisconsin, USA , 2005 .

[46]  A. Prasad,et al.  Potential colonization of newly available tree-species habitat under climate change: An analysis for five eastern US species , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[47]  Naeem,et al.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis , 2005 .

[48]  H. Bugmann,et al.  Improving the formulation of tree growth and succession in a spatially explicit landscape model , 2004 .

[49]  W. Thuiller Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change , 2004 .

[50]  A. Hampe Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide , 2004 .

[51]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Biodiversity conservation: Uncertainty in predictions of extinction risk , 2004, Nature.

[52]  S. Dullinger,et al.  Modelling climate change‐driven treeline shifts: relative effects of temperature increase, dispersal and invasibility , 2004 .

[53]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[54]  W. Thuiller BIOMOD – optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change , 2003 .

[55]  Thomas Hovestadt,et al.  Forecasting plant migration rates: managing uncertainty for risk assessment , 2003 .

[56]  R. Sutherst,et al.  Prediction of species geographical ranges , 2003 .

[57]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Predicting The Spread of Ecological Processes , 2003 .

[58]  J. Travis Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  S. Schneider,et al.  Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants , 2003, Nature.

[60]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[61]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Possible effects of habitat fragmentation and climate change on the range of forest plant species , 2002 .

[62]  R. Neilson,et al.  Estimated migration rates under scenarios of global climate change , 2002 .

[63]  R. Leemans,et al.  Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050 , 2002 .

[64]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[65]  L. Kullman Rapid recent range‐margin rise of tree and shrub species in the Swedish Scandes , 2002 .

[66]  H. Bugmann A Review of Forest Gap Models , 2001 .

[67]  Isabelle Chuine,et al.  Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range , 2001 .

[68]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[69]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[70]  Steven I. Higgins,et al.  USING A DYNAMIC LANDSCAPE MODEL FOR PLANNING THE MANAGEMENT OF ALIEN PLANT INVASIONS , 2000 .

[71]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Comparing models for tree distributions : concept, structures, and behavior , 2000 .

[72]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space-Time Climate Variability. Part II: Development of 1901-96 Monthly Grids of Terrestrial Surface Climate , 2000 .

[73]  H. Pulliam On the relationship between niche and distribution , 2000 .

[74]  S. Ferrier,et al.  An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression , 2000 .

[75]  Hughes,et al.  Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[76]  V. Pope,et al.  The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3 , 2000 .

[77]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Growing season extended in Europe , 1999, Nature.

[78]  J. Lawton,et al.  Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming , 1998, Nature.

[79]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[80]  Susan E. Lee,et al.  Contrasting physiological and structural vegetation feedbacks in climate change simulations , 1997, Nature.

[81]  C. Tucker,et al.  Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991 , 1997, Nature.

[82]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[83]  Andrew D. Friend,et al.  A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v3.0) , 1997 .

[84]  W. Cramer,et al.  Past and future rapid environmental changes : the spatial and evolutionary responses of terrestrial biota , 1997 .

[85]  The biogeographic consequences of forecast changes in the global environment: Individual species’ potential range changes , 1997 .

[86]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[87]  Craig Loehle,et al.  Model-based assessments of climate change effects on forests , 1995 .

[88]  R. Neilson A Model for Predicting Continental‐Scale Vegetation Distribution and Water Balance , 1995 .

[89]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements: I. The design of a northeastern forest simulator , 1993 .

[90]  Brian Huntley,et al.  How Plants Respond to Climate Change: Migration Rates, Individualism and the Consequences for Plant Communities , 1991 .

[91]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[92]  F. Vuilleumier An atlas of past and Present Pollen Maps for Europe: 0-13000 Years Ago , 1987 .

[93]  F. Woodward Climate and plant distribution , 1987 .

[94]  B. Rathcke,et al.  Phenological Patterns of Terrestrial Plants , 1985 .

[95]  B. Huntley,et al.  An Atlas of Past and Present Pollen Maps for Europe , 1984 .

[96]  M. B. Davis,et al.  Pleistocene biogeography of temperate deciduous forests , 1976 .

[97]  L. L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  Population Studies: Animal Ecology and Demography. , 1959 .

[98]  S S I T C H,et al.  Evaluation of Ecosystem Dynamics, Plant Geography and Terrestrial Carbon Cycling in the Lpj Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2022 .