Reducing global CO2 emissions with the technologies we have

The energy intensities of the various industrial sectors differ considerably across countries. This suggests a potential for emissions reductions through improved accessibility to efficient technologies. This paper estimates an upper-bound CO2 emission mitigation potential that could theoretically be achieved by improved access to efficient technologies in industrial sectors. We develop a linear optimization framework that facilitates the exchange of sectoral production technologies based on the World Input-Output Database (WIOD), assuming perfect substitutability of technologies and homogeneity within economic sectors, while ignoring barriers to technological adoption and price driven adjustments. We consider the full global supply chain network and multiple upstream production inputs in addition to energy demand. In contrast to existing literature our framework allows to consider supply chain effects of technology replacements. We use our model to calculate emission reduction potentials for varying levels of access to technology. If best practice technologies were made available globally, CO2 emissions could theoretically be reduced by more than 10 gigatons (Gt). In fact, even second-tier production technologies would create significant global reduction potentials. We decompose sectoral emission reductions to identify contributions by changes in energy intensity, supply chain effects and changes in carbon intensities. Excluding the latter, we find that considering supply chain effects increases total mitigation potentials by 14%. The largest CO2 emission reduction potentials are found for a small set of developing countries.

[1]  Yongxia Cai,et al.  The role of China in mitigating climate change , 2012 .

[2]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report: A contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2001 .

[3]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  Drivers for the renaissance of coal , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Michael Schymura,et al.  SUBSTITUTION ELASTICITIES IN A CONSTANT ELASTICITY OF SUBSTITUTION FRAMEWORK – EMPIRICAL ESTIMATES USING NONLINEAR LEAST SQUARES , 2015 .

[5]  Kenneth Gillingham,et al.  The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy , 2015 .

[6]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[7]  B. Javorcik Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages , 2002 .

[8]  H. Matthews,et al.  Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure , 2010, Science.

[9]  Chuanyi Lu,et al.  The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy , 2010 .

[10]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  M. Glachant,et al.  Invention and Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies : A Global Analysis Prepared for the Review of Environmental Economics and Policy , 2010 .

[12]  Bart Los,et al.  THE CONSTRUCTION OF WORLD INPUT–OUTPUT TABLES IN THE WIOD PROJECT , 2013 .

[13]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[14]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Global Sustainability Accounting—Developing EXIOBASE for Multi-Regional Footprint Analysis , 2014 .

[15]  Yann Ménière,et al.  What Drives the International Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies? Empirical Evidence from Patent Data , 2010, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[16]  Deger Saygin,et al.  Benchmarking the energy use of energy-intensive industries in industrialized and in developing countries , 2011 .

[17]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  The role of capital costs in decarbonizing the electricity sector , 2016 .

[18]  Aaditya Mattoo,et al.  Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India , 2010 .

[19]  G. Müller-Fürstenberger,et al.  Global Warming, Technological Change and Trade in Carbon Energy: Challenge or Threat? , 2014, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[20]  Markus Haller,et al.  Will History Repeat Itself? Economic Convergence and Convergence in Energy Use Patterns , 2012 .

[21]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems , 1995 .

[22]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  International comparison of industrial CO2 emission trends and the energy efficiency paradox utilizing production-based decomposition , 2012 .

[23]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  Derisking Renewable Energy Investment. A Framework to Support Policymakers in Selecting Public Instruments to Promote Renewable Energy Investment in Developing Countries , 2013 .

[24]  Stephen L. Parente,et al.  Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  Wenjie Dong,et al.  Structural Path Analysis of Fossil Fuel Based CO2 Emissions: A Case Study for China , 2015, PloS one.

[26]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  EFFECTS OF SECTOR AGGREGATION ON CO2 MULTIPLIERS IN MULTIREGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSES , 2014 .

[27]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Energy policy: The rebound effect is overplayed , 2013, Nature.

[28]  Peter D. Blair,et al.  Input-Output Analysis , 2009 .

[29]  T. Norgate,et al.  Assessing the environmental impact of metal production processes , 2007 .

[30]  David Hummels Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization , 2007 .

[31]  Misak Avetisyan,et al.  Trade and the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from International Freight Transport , 2011 .

[32]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? , 1994 .

[33]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  REGIONAL AND SECTORAL DISAGGREGATION OF MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT TABLES – A FLEXIBLE ALGORITHM , 2015 .

[34]  F. Pothen,et al.  The basic WIOD CGE model : a computable general equilibrium model based on the World Input-Output Database , 2013 .

[35]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  The elasticity of substitution and the way of nesting CES production function with emphasis on energy input , 2014 .

[36]  Peeling the Onion: Analyzing Aggregate, National and Sectoral Energy Intensity in the European Union , 2015 .

[37]  Peter Mulder,et al.  Structural Change and Convergence of Energy Intensity across OECD Countries , 2012 .

[38]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Contracts and Technology Adoption , 2007 .

[39]  A. Löschel,et al.  Energy Biased Technical Change: A Cge Analysis , 2007 .

[40]  Peter Mulder,et al.  Structural Change and Convergence of Energy Intensity Across OECD Countries, 1970-2005 , 2012 .

[41]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Combining bottom-up and top-down , 2008 .

[42]  Elena Verdolini,et al.  Energy Intensity Developments in 40 Major Economies: Structural Change or Technology Improvement? , 2013 .

[43]  S. Rubio,et al.  Sharing R&D Investments in Cleaner Technologies to Mitigate Climate Change , 2014 .

[44]  Sonja Peterson,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in developing countries through technology transfer?: a survey of empirical evidence , 2008 .

[45]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  The Value-Added of Sectoral Disaggregation: Implications on Competitive Consequences of Climate Change Policies , 2012 .

[46]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  On the Effects of Unilateral Environmental Policy on Offshoring in Multi-Stage Production Processes , 2014 .

[47]  John P. Weyant,et al.  The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies , 2014, Climatic Change.

[48]  J. Goldemberg Leapfrog energy technologies , 1998 .

[49]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT TABLE BASED ON THE GLOBAL TRADE ANALYSIS PROJECT DATABASE (GTAP-MRIO) , 2013 .

[50]  E. Dietzenbacher,et al.  An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production , 2015 .

[51]  David I. Stern,et al.  Energy and Economic Growth: The Stylized Facts , 2014 .

[52]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Linear programming and extensions , 1965 .

[53]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  How climate change mitigation could harm development in poor countries , 2014 .

[54]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  Feasible mitigation actions in developing countries , 2014 .