Understanding the emergence and deployment of “nano” S&T

As an introduction to the special issue on "emerging nanotechnologies", this paper puts in perspective contemporary debates and challenges about nanotechnology. It presents an overview of diverse analyses and expectations about this presumably revolutionary set of technological, scientific and industrial developments. Three main lines of argument can then be delineated: first of all, the degree of cumulativeness of science and technologies and the respective roles of newcomers and incumbents in the industrial dynamics; second the knowledge dynamics in nanotechnologies, especially the linkages by science and technology and third the role of institutions (network, geographic agglomeration and job market). It finally discusses methodologies to delineate the field of nanotechnologies and to collect data. For more informations: http: //www.nanoeconomics.eu/

[1]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[2]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[3]  C. Hamlin,et al.  Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine , 2001 .

[4]  K. Blind.  Explanatory factors for participation in formal standardisation processes: Empirical evidence at firm level , 2006 .

[5]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’ , 2007 .

[6]  Julie M. Hite,et al.  The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm , 2001 .

[7]  R. Kostoff,et al.  The seminal literature of nanotechnology research , 2006 .

[8]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation, Competition, and Industry Structure , 1993 .

[9]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital , 2005 .

[10]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology , 2007 .

[11]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  The nanotech vs . the biotech revolution : sources of productivity in incumbent firm research , 2007 .

[12]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: the experience of biotech start-ups in France , 2004 .

[13]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Responding to Structural Industry Changes: A Technological Evolution Perspective , 1997 .

[14]  J. Pickstone.  Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology, and Medicine , 2000 .

[15]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[16]  Mike Wright,et al.  Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy , 2006 .

[17]  Simcha Jong,et al.  How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry , 2006 .

[18]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance , 2005 .

[19]  Christoph Grimpe,et al.  Regional knowledge production in nanomaterials: a spatial filtering approach , 2008 .

[20]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  The Spatial Clustering of Science and Capital: Accounting for Biotech Firm-Venture Capital Relationships , 2002 .

[21]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Editor's introduction: building and deploying scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[22]  Knut Blind,et al.  Research and standardisation in nanotechnology: evidence from Germany , 2009 .

[23]  Christoph Grimpe,et al.  Knowledge Production in Nanomaterials: An Application of Spatial Filtering to Regional Systems of Innovation , 2008 .

[24]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Grilichesian Breakthroughs: Inventions of Methods of Inventing and Firm Entry in Nanotechnology , 2005 .

[25]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[26]  Andrei Mogoutov,et al.  Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking , 2007 .

[27]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Small Size of the Small Scale Market: The Early-Stage Labor Market for Highly Skilled Nanotechnology Workers , 2006 .

[28]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[29]  L. Zucker,et al.  Minerva Unbound: Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and New Knowledge Production , 2006 .

[30]  Eric Avenel,et al.  Diversification and hybridization in firm knowledge bases in nanotechnologies , 2007, 0911.3476.

[31]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Proximity and Innovation , 2001 .

[32]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology , 2007, 0911.2982.

[33]  C. Hill,et al.  The Performance of Incumbent firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation , 2003 .

[34]  A. Bonaccorsi.  Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science , 2008 .

[35]  Jesse A. Stump,et al.  The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature , 2006 .

[36]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Grilichesian Breakthroughs: Inventions of Methods of Inventing and Firm Entry in Nanotechnology , 2003 .

[37]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[38]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[39]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .