Disciplinary Differences: LCSH and Keyword Assignment for ETDs from Different Disciplines
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Steven T. Walsh,et al. What are Research Expectations? A Comparative Study of Different Academic Disciplines , 2012 .
[2] Patrick OBrien,et al. Managing Search Engine Optimization: An Introduction for Library Administrators , 2013 .
[3] Margaret Beecher Maurer,et al. Uniqueness Matters: Author-Supplied Keywords and LCSH in the Library Catalog , 2012 .
[4] Karri A. Holley. Special Issue: Understanding Interdisciplinary Challenges and Opportunities in Higher Education. , 2009 .
[5] A. Biglan. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. , 1973 .
[6] Erik Wilde,et al. Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO) , 2010 .
[7] Plergiorgio Strata,et al. Citation analysis , 1995, Nature.
[8] Paul A Prior,et al. Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy , 1998 .
[9] Pierre Tirilly,et al. Constructing a true LCSH tree of a science and engineering collection , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[10] Kathleen Bauer,et al. Does Faceted Display in a Library Catalogue Increase Use of subject Headings? , 2012, Libr. Hi Tech.
[11] Lona Hoover,et al. A Beginners' Guide for Subject Analysis of Theses and Dissertations in the Hard Sciences , 2005 .
[12] Arlene G. Taylor,et al. Still a Lot to Lose: The Role of Controlled Vocabulary in Keyword Searching , 2015 .
[13] Hollie White,et al. Examining Scientific Vocabulary: Mapping Controlled Vocabularies with Free Text Keywords , 2013 .
[14] C. Rockelle Strader. Citation Analysis: Do Age and Types of Materials Cited Correlate with Availability of Appropriate Library of Congress Subject Headings? , 2012 .
[15] Paul A Prior,et al. Chapter 2: Academic enculturation: Developing literate practices and disciplinary identities , 2012 .
[16] B. Walvoord,et al. Thinking and Writing in College: A Naturalistic Study of Students in Four Disciplines , 1991 .
[17] Jody Condit Fagan. Usability studies of faceted browsing: A literature review , 2010 .
[18] Margaret Beecher Maurer,et al. Who's Doing What? Findability and Author-Supplied ETD Metadata in the Library Catalog , 2011 .
[19] Sevim Mccutcheon,et al. Keyword vs controlled vocabulary searching: the one with the most tools wins , 2009 .
[20] Tschera Harkness Connell,et al. Techniques to improve subject retrieval in online catalogs: flexible access to elements in the bibliographic record , 1991 .
[21] Kun Lu,et al. Understanding the retrieval effectiveness of collaborative tags and author keywords in different retrieval environments: An experimental study on medical collections , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[22] Di Su. Standardization of Keyword Search Mode , 2010 .
[23] Willis A. Jones. Variation among Academic Disciplines: An Update on Analytical Frameworks and Research , 2012 .
[24] Robert E. Wolverton,et al. Subject Analysis of Theses and Dissertations: A Survey , 2011 .
[25] Mlis,et al. Cataloging and Treatment of Theses, Dissertations, and ETDs , 2003 .
[26] Margaret Beecher Maurer,et al. Morphing metadata: maximizing access to electronic theses and dissertations , 2008, Libr. Hi Tech.
[27] C. Rockelle Strader. Author-assigned keywords versus library of congress subject headings: Implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations , 2009 .
[28] Melius Weideman,et al. Keyword stuffing and the big three search engines , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..
[29] Greta de Groat. A History of Video Game Cataloging in U.S. Libraries , 2015 .