Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale

Many Smart City projects are beginning to consider the role of citizens. However, current methods for engaging urban populations in participatory design (PD) activities are somewhat limited. In this article, we describe an approach taken to empower socially disadvantaged citizens, using a variety of both social and technological tools, in a Smart City project. Through analysing the nature of citizens’ concerns and proposed solutions, we explore the benefits of our approach, arguing that engaging citizens can uncover hyper-local concerns that provide a foundation for finding solutions to address citizen concerns. By reflecting on our approach, we identify four key challenges to utilising PD at an urban scale; balancing scale with the personal, who has control of the process, who is participating and integrating citizen-led work with local authorities. By addressing these challenges, we will be able to truly engage citizens as collaborators in co-designing their city.

[1]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[3]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[4]  Andrew Clement,et al.  A retrospective look at PD projects , 1993, CACM.

[5]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  Democracy & Technological Change: Limits to Steering , 1998 .

[6]  D. Weiss,et al.  Interrater reliability and agreement. , 2000 .

[7]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[8]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[9]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  From small scale to large scale user participation: a case study of participatory design in e-government systems , 2004, PDC 04.

[10]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[11]  R. Couto.  Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[12]  Andrea L. Kavanaugh,et al.  Participating in civil society: the case of networked communities , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[13]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Participatory design in community informatics , 2007 .

[14]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Participation in design things , 2008, PDC.

[15]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative research : techniques and , 2008 .

[16]  Andrea Botero,et al.  Co-designing for new city-citizen interaction possibilities: weaving prototypes and interventions in the design and development of Urban Mediator , 2008, PDC.

[17]  L. Lee-Kelley,et al.  Citizens' attitudes towards e‐government and e‐governance: a UK study , 2008 .

[18]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Participative design and the challenges of large-scale systems: extending the iterative PD approach , 2008, PDC.

[19]  R. Hollands.  Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[20]  E. Helsper.  Digital inclusion: an analysis of social disadvantage and the information society , 2008 .

[21]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  Participatory design: one step back or two steps forward? , 2008, PDC.

[22]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[23]  Ina Wagner,et al.  Supporting community engagement in the city: urban planning in the MR-tent , 2009, C&T.

[24]  Andrea Botero,et al.  Enhancing citizenship: the role of in-between infrastructures , 2010, PDC '10.

[25]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Participatory design and "democratizing innovation" , 2010, PDC '10.

[26]  W. Mensink,et al.  Unpacking European Living Labs: Analysing Innovation’s Social Dimensions , 2010 .

[27]  Helka-Liisa Hentilä,et al.  Boosting web-based public participation in urban planning with a group of key stakeholders , 2010, PDC '10.

[28]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[29]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[30]  Matt Leighninger,et al.  Citizenship and governance in a wild, wired world: How should citizens and public managers use online tools to improve democracy? , 2011 .

[31]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI , 2011, CHI.

[32]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city , 2012, CSCW.

[33]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design , 2012, PDC '12.

[34]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design , 2012 .

[35]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[36]  Katarina Lindblad-Gidlund,et al.  Designing for all and no one - practitioners understandings of citizen driven development of public e-services , 2012, PDC '12.

[37]  Esteve Almirall,et al.  Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies , 2012 .

[38]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework , 2012, HICSS.

[39]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Methods: organising principles and general guidelines for Participatory Design projects , 2012 .

[40]  Lieven De Marez,et al.  Smart Ideas for Smart Cities: Investigating Crowdsourcing for Generating and Selecting Ideas for ICT Innovation in a City Context , 2012, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[41]  Alan Borning,et al.  Supporting reflective public thought with considerit , 2012, CSCW.

[42]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  From School Food to Skate Parks in a Few Clicks: Using Public Displays to Bootstrap Civic Engagement of the Young , 2012, Pervasive.

[43]  Shelly Farnham,et al.  Puget sound off: fostering youth civic engagement through citizen journalism , 2012, CSCW.

[44]  T. Robertson,et al.  Ethics: engagement, representation and politics-in-action , 2012 .

[45]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices , 2012, CHI.

[46]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design , 2013, CHI.

[47]  J. Wareham,et al.  A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona , 2012, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[48]  H. Hielkema,et al.  Developing the Helsinki Smart City: The Role of Competitions for Open Data Applications , 2012, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[49]  R. Kitchin,et al.  The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism , 2013, GeoJournal.

[50]  Fabio Carrera,et al.  BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE: THE CROWDSOURCING OF "STREETBUMP": AN AUTOMATIC POTHOLE MAPPING APP , 2013 .

[51]  Tomas Diez,et al.  The fab and the smart city: the use of machines and technology for the city production by its citizens , 2013, TEI '13.

[52]  Anthony Townsend,et al.  Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia , 2013 .

[53]  François Charoy,et al.  CrowdSC: Building Smart Cities with Large-Scale Citizen Participation , 2013, IEEE Internet Computing.

[54]  Jes A. Koepfler,et al.  Civic action brokering platforms: facilitating local engagement with ACTion Alexandria , 2014, CSCW.

[55]  Jon Whittle,et al.  How much participation is enough?: a comparison of six participatory design projects in terms of outcomes , 2014, PDC.

[56]  Nina Valkanova,et al.  Smart Citizen Sentiment Dashboard: A Case Study Into Media Architectural Interfaces , 2014, PerDis.

[57]  Jörg Müller,et al.  MyPosition: sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization , 2014, CSCW.

[58]  Francesca Rizzo,et al.  Design and Organizational Change in the Public Sector , 2014 .

[59]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work , 2014, CSCW.

[60]  Ilari Lindy,et al.  Citizen-Driven Innovation , 2015 .

[61]  Pierre Delvenne,et al.  Involvement of end-users in innovation processes: toward a user-driven approach of innovation. A qualitative analysis of 20 Livings Labs , 2015 .

[62]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  StitchFest: Diversifying a College Hackathon to Broaden Participation and Perceptions in Computing , 2015, SIGCSE.

[63]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Reimagining the role of citizens in smart city projects , 2015, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[64]  Julie A. McCann,et al.  The Programmable City , 2015, ANT/SEIT.

[65]  Mark Rouncefield,et al.  HCI, Civic Engagement & Trust , 2015, CHI.

[66]  Martin Tomitsch,et al.  From Users to Citizens: Some Thoughts on Designing for Polity and Civics , 2015, OZCHI.

[67]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement? , 2015, IOT 2015.

[68]  Christopher A. Le Dantec,et al.  Planning with Crowdsourced Data: Rhetoric and Representation in Transportation Planning , 2015, CSCW.

[69]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  VoxBox: A Tangible Machine that Gathers Opinions from the Public at Events , 2015, TEI.

[70]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  Civic crowdfunding research: Challenges, opportunities, and future agenda , 2015, New Media Soc..

[71]  Ayona Datta.  New urban utopias of postcolonial India , 2015 .

[72]  Kurt Eiselt,et al.  Understanding and improving the culture of hackathons: Think global hack local , 2015, 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[73]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[74]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism , 2016, CHI.

[75]  A. Vanolo.  Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow’s smart cities , 2016 .

[76]  Leo van den Berg,et al.  National Policy Responses to Urban Challenges in Europe , 2016 .

[77]  Alessandro Deserti,et al.  Design and the Transformation of Cities , 2016 .

[78]  Sarah-Kristin Thiel.  Reward-based vs. Social Gamification: Exploring Effectiveness of Gamefulness in Public Participation , 2016, NordiCHI.

[79]  Danial Qaurooni,et al.  Citizens for Science and Science for Citizens: The View from Participatory Design , 2016, CHI.

[80]  Janne Lahti,et al.  Involving Citizens in Open Innovation Process by Means of Gamification: the Case of WeLive , 2016, NordiCHI.

[81]  Esteve Almirall,et al.  Open data and civic apps , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[82]  Àlvaro Duarte de Oliveira.  The Human Smart Cities Manifesto: A Global Perspective , 2016 .

[83]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Data and the City , 2016, CHI.

[84]  Nick Taylor,et al.  Reflections on Deploying Distributed Consultation Technologies with Community Organisations , 2016, CHI.

[85]  Daniela Fogli,et al.  Promoting Citizen Participation through Gamification , 2016, NordiCHI.

[86]  Carl F. DiSalvo,et al.  Data, Design and Civics: An Exploratory Study of Civic Tech , 2016, CHI.

[87]  Grazia Concilio,et al.  Urban Living Labs: Opportunities in and for Planning , 2016 .

[88]  D. Schuler.  Smart Cities + Smart Citizens = Civic Intelligence? , 2016 .

[89]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Designing in between Local Government and the Public – Using Institutional Analysis in Interventions on Civic Infrastructures , 2017, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[90]  Tony Filipovitch.  The responsive city: Engaging communities through data-smart governance, by Stephen Goldsmith and Susan Crawford , 2015 .