Open Science Support as a Portfolio of Services and Projects: From Awareness to Engagement

Together with many other universities worldwide, the University of Gottingen has aimed to unlock the full potential of networked digital scientific communication by strengthening open access as early as the late 1990s. Open science policies at the institutional level consequently followed and have been with us for over a decade. However, for several reasons, their adoption often is still far from complete when it comes to the practices of researchers or research groups. To improve this situation at our university, there is dedicated support at the infrastructural level: the university library collaborates with several campus units in developing and running services, activities and projects in support of open access and open science. This article outlines our main activity areas and aligns them with the overall rationale to reach higher uptake and acceptance of open science practice at the university. The mentioned examples of our activities highlight how we seek to advance open science along the needs and perspectives of diverse audiences and by running it as a multi-stakeholder endeavor. Therefore, our activities involve library colleagues with diverse backgrounds, faculty and early career researchers, research managers, as well as project and infrastructure staff. We conclude with a summary of achievements and challenges to be faced.

[1]  Naomi S. Baron.  Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World , 2015 .

[2]  B. Björk.  Growth of hybrid open access, 2009–2016 , 2017, PeerJ.

[3]  Birgit Schmidt,et al.  New alliances for research and teaching support: establishing the Göttingen eResearch Alliance , 2015, Program.

[4]  A Viste.  December 2017. , 2017, The Knee.

[5]  David M Maslove,et al.  Medical Preprints-A Debate Worth Having. , 2017, JAMA.

[6]  Eelco Ferwerda,et al.  A landscape study on Open Access and monographs: policies, funding and publishing in eight European countries , 2017 .

[7]  S. Haustein,et al.  The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  N. Jahn,et al.  Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 a Study of Institutional Spending on Open Access Publication Fees in Germany , 2022 .

[9]  Alistair McCleery,et al.  A review of Scottish publishing in the 21st century. , 2004 .

[10]  Kristine Hillenkötter.  Die Open-Access-Komponente In Den Dfg-Geförderten Allianz-Lizenzen , 2012 .

[11]  Bertolt Brecht.  The manifesto , 2002 .

[12]  Stephen Pinfield,et al.  Monitoring the transition to open access: December 2017 , 2017 .

[13]  Graham Stone,et al.  It’s the workflows, stupid! What is required to make ‘offsetting’ work for the open access transition , 2017 .

[14]  Margo Bargheer,et al.  Unlocking the digital potential of scholarly monographs in 21st century research , 2017 .

[15]  Marilyn Deegan,et al.  The Academic Book of the Future , 2015 .

[16]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management , 2015 .

[17]  M. Wacha,et al.  The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles , 2017 .

[18]  M. Jubb,et al.  Monitoring the transition to open access , 2017 .

[19]  Eloy Rodrigues,et al.  Next Generation Repositories. Behaviours and Technical Recommendations of the COAR Next Generation Repositories Working Group , 2017 .

[20]  Birgit Schmidt,et al.  Licensing Revisited: Open Access Clauses in Practice , 2012 .

[21]  Margo Bargheer,et al.  ‘Being small is not a fault’: Making sense of the newer generation of German‐language university presses , 2016 .

[22]  Martin Paul Eve.  Open Access publishing and scholarly communications in non-scientific disciplines , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[23]  David Stuart,et al.  Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[24]  Jee-Hyub Kim,et al.  Europe PMC in 2017 , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Martin Paul Eve,et al.  Open Access Publishing Models and How OA Can Work in the Humanities , 2017 .

[26]  G. Franck.  Scientific Communication--A Vanity Fair? , 1999, Science.