Electrical impact of line-edge roughness on sub-45nm node standard cell

As the transistors are scaled down, undesirable performance mismatch in identically designed transistors increases and hence causes greater impact on circuit performance and yield. Since Line-End Roughness (LER) has been reported to be in the order of several nanometers and not to decrease as the device shrinks, it has evolved as a critical problem in the sub-45nm devices and may lead to serious device parameter fluctuations and performance limitation for the future VLSI circuit application. Although LER is a kind of random variation, it is undesirable and has to be analyzed because it causes the device to fluctuate. In this paper, we present a new cell characterization methodology which uses the non-rectangular gate print-images generated by lithography and etch simulations with the random LER variation to estimate the device performance of a sub-45nm design. The physics based TCAD simulation tool is used for validating the accuracy of our LER model. We systematically analyze the random LER by taking the impact on circuit performance due to LER variation into consideration and suggest the maximum tolerance of LER to minimize the performance degradation. We observed that the driving current is highly affected by LER as the gate length becomes thinner. We performed lithography simulations using 45nm process window to examine the LER impact of the state-of-the-art industrial devices. Results show that the rms value of LER is as much as 10% from its nominal line edge, and the saturation current can vary by as much as 10% in our 2-input NAND cell.

[1]  Gian Francesco Lorusso,et al.  Spectral analysis of line width roughness and its application to immersion lithography , 2006 .

[2]  Dejan Markovic,et al.  Linear analysis of random process variability , 2008, 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design.

[3]  Harry J. Levinson,et al.  Line edge roughness impact on critical dimension variation , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Chris A. Mack Stochastic modeling in lithography: use of dynamical scaling in photoresist development , 2009 .

[5]  David Z. Pan,et al.  Total sensitivity based dfm optimization of standard library cells , 2010, ISPD '10.

[6]  Kenji Yamazaki,et al.  Influence of edge roughness in resist patterns on etched patterns , 1998 .

[7]  O. Noordman,et al.  Speckle in optical lithography and its influence on linewidth roughness , 2009 .

[8]  Kuen-Yu Tsai,et al.  A new method to improve accuracy of leakage current estimation for transistors with non-rectangular gates due to sub-wavelength lithography effects , 2008, 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design.

[9]  Puneet Gupta,et al.  Investigation of diffusion rounding for post-lithography analysis , 2008, 2008 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference.

[10]  E. Nowak,et al.  Weibull breakdown characteristics and oxide thickness uniformity , 2000 .

[11]  A. Asenov,et al.  Intrinsic threshold voltage fluctuations in decanano MOSFETs due to local oxide thickness variations , 2002 .

[12]  Suman Datta,et al.  Impact of line-width roughness on Intel's 65-nm process devices , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Costas Spanos,et al.  Impact of gate line edge roughness on double-gate FinFET performance variability , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Evangelos Gogolides,et al.  Line-edge-roughness transfer during plasma etching: modeling approaches and comparison with experimental results , 2009 .

[15]  Michael Orshansky,et al.  Analysis of systematic variation and impact on circuit performance , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Gregg M. Gallatin Resist blur and line edge roughness (Invited Paper) , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[17]  Peng Yu,et al.  A Unified Non-Rectangular Device and Circuit Simulation Model for Timing and Power , 2006, 2006 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design.

[18]  G. Gallatin,et al.  Residual speckle in a lithographic illumination system , 2009 .

[19]  Evangelos Gogolides,et al.  Photoresist line-edge roughness analysis using scaling concepts , 2004 .

[20]  Costas J. Spanos,et al.  Comparative study of line width roughness (LWR) in next-generation lithography (NGL) processes , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[21]  Andrew R. Neureuther,et al.  From poly line to transistor: building BSIM models for non-rectangular transistors , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[22]  Yiming Li,et al.  Large-scale atomistic approach to random-dopant-induced characteristic variability in nanoscale CMOS digital and high-frequency integrated circuits , 2008, 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design.

[23]  Andreas Erdmann,et al.  A comprehensive resist model for the prediction of line-edge roughness material and process dependencies in optical lithography , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[24]  Yu Cao,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Non-Rectangular Gate for Post-Lithography Circuit Simulation , 2007, 2007 44th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference.

[25]  A. Asenov,et al.  Intrinsic parameter fluctuations in decananometer MOSFETs introduced by gate line edge roughness , 2003 .

[26]  E. Gogolides,et al.  Line edge roughness and critical dimension variation: Fractal characterization and comparison using model functions , 2004 .

[27]  Kun Yuan,et al.  ELIAD: Efficient lithography aware detailed router with compact post-OPC printability prediction , 2008, 2008 45th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference.

[28]  E. Schoell,et al.  Impact of photoresist composition and polymer chain length on line edge roughness probed with a stochastic simulator , 2007 .

[29]  Lars W. Liebmann,et al.  Resolution enhancement techniques in optical lithography: It's not just a mask problem , 2001, Photomask Japan.

[30]  Ching-Te Chuang,et al.  Random Dopant Fluctuation in Limited-Width FinFET Technologies , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.