Design and evaluation of hydrogen electricity reconversion pathways in national energy systems using spatially and temporally resolved energy system optimization

Abstract For this study, a spatially and temporally resolved optimization model was used to investigate and economically evaluate pathways for using surplus electricity to cover positive residual loads by means of different technologies to reconvert hydrogen into electricity. The associated technology pathways consist of electrolyzers, salt caverns, hydrogen pipelines, power cables, and various technologies for reconversion into electricity. The investigations were conducted based on an energy scenario for 2050 in which surplus electricity from northern Germany is available to cover the electricity grid load in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). A key finding of the pathway analysis is that NRW's electricity demand can be covered entirely by renewable energy sources in this scenario, which involves CO2 savings of 44.4 million tons of CO2/a in comparison to the positive residual load being covered from a conventional power plant fleet. The pathway involving CCGT (combined cycle gas turbines) as hydrogen reconversion option was identified as being the most cost effective (total investment: € 43.1 billion, electricity generation costs of reconversion: € 176/MWh). Large-scale hydrogen storage and reconversion as well as the use of the hydrogen infrastructure built for this purpose can make a meaningful contribution to the expansion of the electricity grid. However, for reasons of efficiency, substituting the electricity grid expansion entirely with hydrogen reconversion systems does not make sense from an economic standpoint. Furthermore, the hydrogen reconversion pathways evaluated, including large-scale storage, significantly contribute to the security of the energy supply and to secured power generation capacities.

[1]  Kurt Wagemann,et al.  Energiespeicherung als Element einer sicheren Energieversorgung , 2015 .

[2]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  FINE - Framework for Integrated Energy System Assessment , 2018 .

[3]  Erik Wolf,et al.  Large-Scale Hydrogen Energy Storage , 2015 .

[4]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Hydrogen as an Enabler for Renewable Energies , 2013 .

[5]  Verena Jülch,et al.  Comparison of electricity storage options using levelized cost of storage (LCOS) method , 2016 .

[6]  Sanna Syri,et al.  Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis , 2015 .

[7]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Linking the Power and Transport Sectors—Part 2: Modelling a Sector Coupling Scenario for Germany , 2017 .

[8]  Riccardo Amirante,et al.  Overview on recent developments in energy storage: Mechanical, electrochemical and hydrogen technologies , 2017 .

[9]  Jihong Wang,et al.  Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation , 2015 .

[10]  A. Duigou,et al.  Relevance and costs of large scale underground hydrogen storage in France , 2017 .

[11]  F. Graf,et al.  Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review , 2016 .

[12]  Kaamran Raahemifar,et al.  Co-benefit analysis of incentives for energy generation and storage systems; a multi-stakeholder perspective , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[13]  Janusz Kotowicz,et al.  Analysis of component operation in power-to-gas-to-power installations , 2018 .

[14]  Peter Wasserscheid,et al.  Seasonal storage and alternative carriers: A flexible hydrogen supply chain model , 2017 .

[15]  Andrea Lanzini,et al.  Power-to-Gas Hydrogen: Techno-economic Assessment of Processes towards a Multi-purpose Energy Carrier , 2016 .

[16]  A. Özarslan.  Large-scale hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns , 2012 .

[17]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Spatio-temporal optimization of a future energy system for power-to-hydrogen applications in Germany , 2018, Energy.

[18]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Power to Gas: Technological Overview, Systems Analysis and Economic Assessment , 2015 .

[19]  David Kleinhans,et al.  Integration of Renewable Energy Sources in future power systems: The role of storage , 2014, 1405.2857.

[20]  Thomas Pregger,et al.  Hydrogen generation by electrolysis and storage in salt caverns: Potentials, economics and systems aspects with regard to the German energy transition , 2017 .

[21]  Martin Robinius,et al.  Strom- und Gasmarktdesign zur Versorgung des deutschen Straßenverkehrs mit Wasserstoff , 2015 .

[22]  Ch. Haberstroh,et al.  Exergy and cost analyses of hydrogen-based energy storage pathways for residual load management , 2015 .

[23]  R. Sedlacek,et al.  Untertage Gasspeicherung in Deutschland , 2006 .

[24]  Florian Klumpp,et al.  Comparison of pumped hydro, hydrogen storage and compressed air energy storage for integrating high shares of renewable energies—Potential, cost-comparison and ranking , 2016 .

[25]  P. Ekins,et al.  Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating: A review , 2015 .

[26]  Klaus Jopp.  Die Energie der Zukunft , 2003 .

[27]  Adrian V. Gheorghe,et al.  Hydrogen underground storage in Romania, potential directions of development, stakeholders and general aspects , 2014 .

[28]  D. Stolten,et al.  Linking the Power and Transport Sectors—Part 1: The Principle of Sector Coupling , 2017 .

[29]  Amany von Oehsen,et al.  Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global , 2012 .

[30]  Albert Moser,et al.  Optimal Allocation and Capacity of Energy Storage Systems in a Future European Power System with 100% Renewable Energy Generation , 2014 .

[31]  Fabrizio Cumo,et al.  Power-to-gas leverage effect on power-to-heat application for urban renewable thermal energy systems , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[32]  Mike Steilen,et al.  Hydrogen Conversion into Electricity and Thermal Energy by Fuel Cells: Use of H2-Systems and Batteries , 2015 .