The relationships between spatial ability, logical thinking, mathematics performance and kinematics graph interpretation skills of 12th grade physics students

[1]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[2]  Robinson,et al.  Role of Mimeticism and Spatiality in Textual Recall. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[3]  Mark Sadoski,et al.  Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. , 1993 .

[4]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[5]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article HOW DIAGRAMS CAN IMPROVE REASONING , 2022 .

[6]  Daniel H. Robinson,et al.  Why Graphic Organizers Facilitate Search Processes: Fewer Words or Computationally Efficient Indexing? , 1996 .

[7]  J. Mokros,et al.  The impact of microcomputer‐based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs , 1987 .

[8]  Michael J. Wavering.  Logical Reasoning Necessary to Make Line Graphs. , 1989 .

[9]  Craig A. Berg,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between logical thinking structures and the ability to construct and interpret line graphs , 1994 .

[10]  Carl F. Berger,et al.  Teaching the design and interpretation of graphs through computer-aided graphical data analysis , 1993 .

[11]  Heather Brasell,et al.  The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity , 1987 .

[12]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[13]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  How geographic maps increase recall of instructional text , 1993 .

[14]  Ioanna Vekiri.  What Is the Value of Graphical Displays in Learning? , 2002 .

[15]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[16]  John W. Shrum,et al.  The effects of microcomputer‐based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students , 1990 .

[17]  W. A. Bousfield.  The Occurrence of Clustering in the Recall of Randomly Arranged Associates , 1953 .

[18]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[19]  Daniel H. Robinson,et al.  Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. , 1995 .

[20]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Verbal and spatial encoding of text , 1988 .

[21]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[22]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning , 1964 .

[23]  A. Paivio,et al.  Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? , 1973 .

[24]  William Winn,et al.  Diagrams as aids to problem solving: Their role in facilitating search and computation , 1991 .

[25]  Mary Budd Rowe,et al.  Graphing Skills among High School Physics Students , 1993 .

[26]  Michael Svec.  Improving Graphing Interpretation Skills and Understanding of Motion Using Microcomputer Based Laboratories , 1999 .

[27]  Michael J. Padilla,et al.  The Construction and Validation of the Test of Graphing in Science (TOGS). , 1986 .

[28]  David E. Brown.  Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change , 1992 .

[29]  A. Paivio.  Coding Distinctions and Repetition Effects in Memory1 , 1975 .

[30]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[31]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation , 1991 .

[32]  Göran Rossholm,et al.  Languages of Art , 1998 .

[33]  Dean Zollman,et al.  Influence of Interactive Videodisc Instruction Using Simultaneous-Time Analysis on Kinematics Graphing Skills of High School Physics Students. , 1995 .

[34]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Students' Use of Imagery in Solving Qualitative Problems in Kinematics. , 1999 .

[35]  Ricardo Trumper.  Learning kinematics with a V-Scope: a case study , 1997 .

[36]  M. Battista.  Spatial Visualization and Gender Differences in High School Geometry. , 1990 .

[37]  R. Mayer,et al.  A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text , 1995 .

[38]  A. Paivio,et al.  Effects of concreteness and semantic relatedness on composite imagery ratings and cued recall , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Michael Macdonald-Ross.  How Numbers are Shown: A Review of Research on the Presentation of Quantitative Data in Texts. , 1977 .

[40]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Organized spatial displays and texts : Effects of presentation order and display type on learning outcomes , 1997 .

[41]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[42]  D. Nishimura.  Graphically Speaking , 1999, Science.

[43]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  Chapter 10 Reference Maps as a Framework for Remembering Text , 1994 .

[44]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SIMULTANEOUS MOTION PRESENTATION AND GRAPH GENERATION IN A KINEMATICS LAB , 1990 .