The Allocation of Attention and Working Memory in Visual Crowding

When the distance between a visual target and nearby flankers falls below a critical distance, target discrimination declines precipitously. This is called “crowding.” Many researchers have proposed that selective attention plays a role in crowding. However, although some research has examined the effects of directing attention toward versus away from the targets, no previous research has assessed how attentional allocation varies as a function of target–flanker distance in crowding. Here, we used ERPs to assess the operation of attention during crowding, focusing on the attention-related N2pc component. We used a typical crowding task in which participants were asked to report the category (vowel/consonant) of a lateralized target letter flanked by distractor letters at different distances. We tested the hypothesis that attention fails when the target–flanker distance becomes too small for attention to operate effectively. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that N2pc amplitude was maximal at intermediate target–flanker distances and decreased substantially when crowding became severe. In addition, we examined the sustained posterior contralateral negativity (SPCN), which reflects the amount of information being maintained in working memory. Unlike the N2pc component, the SPCN increased in amplitude at small target–flanker distances, suggesting that observers stored information about the target and flankers in working memory when attention failed to select the target. Together, the N2pc and SPCN results suggest that attention and working memory play distinctive roles in crowding: Attention operates to minimize interference from the flankers at intermediate target–flanker distances, whereas working memory may be recruited when attention fails to select the target at small target–flanker distances.

[1]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  Neural Measures of Dynamic Changes in Attentive Tracking Load , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  S. Luck,et al.  ERP Components: The Ups and Downs of Brainwave Recordings , 2011 .

[3]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[6]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of the Focusing of Attention within Complex Visual Scenes: N2pc and Related ERP Components , 2011 .

[7]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[8]  John McDonald,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of multitasking impairment of attentional deployment reflects target-specific processing, not distractor inhibition. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  Paul M. Corballis,et al.  Event-Related Potentials Dissociate Effects of Salience and Space in Biased Competition for Visual Representation , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[11]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  P. Berg,et al.  Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials I: Scalp topography , 2005, Brain Topography.

[14]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[16]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  Distinguishing between lateralized and nonlateralized brain activity associated with visual short-term memory: fMRI, MEG, and EEG evidence from the same observers , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  Kenneth A. Kooi,et al.  American electroencephalographic society , 1964 .

[18]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Jeffrey R W Mounts,et al.  Competitive interaction degrades target selection: an ERP study. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[20]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Serial deployment of attention during visual search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[23]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Benoit Brisson,et al.  Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task , 2008, Brain Research.

[25]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[26]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[27]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Guideline Thirteen: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1994, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[29]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[30]  Steven L Franconeri,et al.  The Head of the Table: Marking the “Front” of An Object Is Tightly Linked with Selection , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Pierre Jolicœur,et al.  Cross-modal multitasking processing deficits prior to the central bottleneck revealed by event-related potentials , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[33]  S. Luck,et al.  The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception , 2010 .

[34]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..