Consistency of individual differences in non-specific electrodermal activity

The study sought to determine whether, as implied by a trait interpretation of individual differences in non-specific electrodermal responding, the frequency of NSRs is a consistent characteristic of subjects across conditions. 40 male subjects completed two 1-hour sessions spaced at an interval of 2 weeks. In each session, three 12-min conditions were administered: relaxation, vigilance, and mental arithmetic. Continuous recordings were made throughout each condition of electrodermal and respiratory activity, and at the end of each condition subjects completed an Adjective Checklist (ACL). Counts were made of the total number of 10-sec intervals during each condition in which at least one NSR was recorded. Separate counts were made for large amplitude (equal to or greater than 1% of baseline) and for small amplitude (less than 1%) responses. Analyses of variance performed on the NSR data indicated that the major component of variance was that due to subjects, and that the interactions between subjects and conditions and subjects and sessions, which would contradict a trait interpretation, were negligible. Consistency in subject's responding was estimated by intraclass correlations across conditions and sessions. For NSR large, the coefficient was 0.58 and for NSR small 0.50. The data were interpreted as support for a trait interpretation of NSR frequency.

[1]  W. G. Reese,et al.  Physiological Reactivity to Different Stressors and Methods of Evaluation , 1963 .

[2]  T. Zahn Autonomic nervous system characteristics possibly related to a genetic predisposition to schizophrenia. , 1977, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[3]  R. Thayer,et al.  Measurement of Activation through Self-Report , 1967, Psychological reports.

[4]  S. Golding Flies in the ointment: Methodological problems in the analysis of the percentage of variance due to persons and situations. , 1975 .

[5]  F M Kopacz,et al.  Sex differences in skin conductance measures as a function of shock threat. , 1971, Psychophysiology.

[6]  H. Kimmel,et al.  Habituation of Large and Small GSRs , 1966, Psychological reports.

[7]  G. Bohlin Interaction of arousal and habituation in the development of sleep during monotonous stimulation. , 1973, Biological psychology.

[8]  M. Coles,et al.  Personality and habituation of the orienting reaction: tonic and response measures of electrodermal activity. , 1971, Psychophysiology.

[9]  S. Epstein,et al.  Availability of an avoidance response as related to autonomic arousal. , 1976, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  N. Endler,et al.  Estimating Variance Components from Mean Squares for Random and Mixed Effects Analysis of Variance Models , 1966 .

[11]  A. Crider,et al.  Electrodermal lability as a personality dimension. , 1971 .

[12]  B. C. Lacey,et al.  The relationship of resting autonomic activity to motor impulsivity. , 1958, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[13]  A. Mundy-castle,et al.  The psychophysiological significance of the galvanic skin response. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  M. Tatsuoka,et al.  Fixed Effects vs Random Effects: Estimating Variance Components from Mean Squares , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  An examination of the nonspecific skin resistance response , 1975 .

[16]  Electrodermal lability and the or: reply to o'gorman and further exposition of the “significance hypothesis”1 , 1973 .

[17]  M. Lader THE EFFECT OF CYCLOBARBITONE ON THE HABITUATION OF THE PSYCHO-GALVANIC REFLEX. , 1964, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  N. Burch,et al.  Drugs and Human Fatigue: GSR Parameters , 1958 .

[19]  L. Johnson Some attributes of spontaneous autonomic activity. , 1963 .

[20]  W. I. Hume CHAPTER 4 – PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES IN TWINS , 1973 .

[21]  L. Wing,et al.  Physiological Measures, Sedative Drugs, and Morbid Anxiety , 1966 .