Evaluation of a Stereo Music Preprocessing Scheme for Cochlear Implant Users

Abstract Background: Although for most cochlear implant (CI) users good speech understanding is reached (at least in quiet environments), the perception and the appraisal of music are generally unsatisfactory. Purpose: The improvement in music appraisal was evaluated in CI participants by using a stereo music preprocessing scheme implemented on a take-home device, in a comfortable listening environment. The preprocessing allowed adjusting the balance among vocals/bass/drums and other instruments, and was evaluated for different genres of music. The correlation between the preferred settings and the participants’ speech and pitch detection performance was investigated. Research Design: During the initial visit preceding the take-home test, the participants’ speech-in-noise perception and pitch detection performance were measured, and a questionnaire about their music involvement was completed. The take-home device was provided, including the stereo music preprocessing scheme and seven playlists with six songs each. The participants were asked to adjust the balance by means of a turning wheel to make the music sound most enjoyable, and to repeat this three times for all songs. Study Sample: Twelve postlingually deafened CI users participated in the study. Data Collection and Analysis: The data were collected by means of a take-home device, which preserved all the preferred settings for the different songs. Statistical analysis was done with a Friedman test (with post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test) to check the effect of “Genre.” The correlations were investigated with Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results: All participants preferred a balance significantly different from the original balance. Differences across participants were observed which could not be explained by perceptual abilities. An effect of “Genre” was found, showing significantly smaller preferred deviation from the original balance for Golden Oldies compared to the other genres. Conclusions: The stereo music preprocessing scheme showed an improvement in music appraisal with complex music and hence might be a good tool for music listening, training, or rehabilitation for CI users.

[1]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Steven Gelineck,et al.  Audio Engineering Society Convention 137 , 2014 .

[3]  M. Moonen,et al.  Music mixing preferences of cochlear implant recipients: A pilot study , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[4]  Charles J. Limb,et al.  Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users , 2014, Hearing Research.

[5]  R. Uchanski,et al.  Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[6]  Earl Vickers The Loudness War: Background, Speculation, and Recommendations , 2010 .

[7]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Development and Validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception Test , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. Gavilán,et al.  Changes in listening habits and quality of musical sound after cochlear implantation , 2008, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[10]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  Clinical Assessment of Music Perception in Cochlear Implant Listeners , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  Patrick Breheny,et al.  Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[12]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[13]  L. Hickson,et al.  Comparisons of Quality Ratings for Music by Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Users , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Charles J Limb,et al.  Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music , 2006, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[15]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Improved Music Perception with Explicit Pitch Coding in Cochlear Implants , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[16]  Hugh J. McDermott Music Perception with Cochlear Implants: A Review , 2004, Trends in amplification.

[17]  J. Knutson,et al.  The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. , 2003, Journal of music therapy.

[18]  S Mirza,et al.  Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire , 2003, Cochlear implants international.

[19]  J. Knutson,et al.  Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[20]  P. Loizou Introduction to cochlear implants. , 1999, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.