Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA‐Based Next‐Generation Sequencing Assay in a Cohort of Patients with Solid tumors: A Proposed Solution for Decentralized Plasma Testing

Abstract Background Characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been integrated into clinical practice. Although labs have standardized validation procedures to develop single locus tests, the efficacy of on‐site plasma‐based next‐generation sequencing (NGS) assays still needs to be proved. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, we profiled DNA from matched tissue and plasma samples from 75 patients with cancer. We applied an NGS test that detects clinically relevant alterations in 33 genes and microsatellite instability (MSI) to analyze plasma cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). Results The concordance between alterations detected in both tissue and plasma samples was higher in patients with metastatic disease. The NGS test detected 77% of sequence alterations, amplifications, and fusions that were found in metastatic samples compared with 45% of those alterations found in the primary tumor samples (p = .00005). There was 87% agreement on MSI status between the NGS test and tumor tissue results. In three patients, MSI‐high ctDNA correlated with response to immunotherapy. In addition, the NGS test revealed an FGFR2 amplification that was not detected in tumor tissue from a patient with metastatic gastric cancer, emphasizing the importance of profiling plasma samples in patients with advanced cancer. Conclusion Our validation experience of a plasma‐based NGS assay advances current knowledge about translating cfDNA testing into clinical practice and supports the application of plasma assays in the management of oncology patients with metastatic disease. With an in‐house method that minimizes the need for invasive procedures, on‐site cfDNA testing supplements tissue biopsy to guide precision therapy and is entitled to become a routine practice. Implications for Practice This study proposes a solution for decentralized liquid biopsy testing based on validation of a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test that detects four classes of genomic alterations in blood: sequence mutations (single nucleotide substitutions or insertions and deletions), fusions, amplifications, and microsatellite instability (MSI). Although there are reference labs that perform single‐site comprehensive liquid biopsy testing, the targeted assay this study validated can be established locally in any lab with capacity to offer clinical molecular pathology assays. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report that validates evaluating an on‐site plasma‐based NGS test that detects the MSI status along with common sequence alterations encountered in solid tumors.

[1]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  The predictive and prognostic significance of cell‐free DNA concentration in melanoma , 2020, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[2]  M. Rubin,et al.  Fusions involving BCOR and CREBBP are rare events in infiltrating glioma , 2020, Acta Neuropathologica Communications.

[3]  E. Schuuring,et al.  The potential of combined mutation sequencing of plasma circulating cell‐free DNA and matched white blood cells for treatment response prediction , 2020, Molecular oncology.

[4]  L. Jahangiri,et al.  Assessing the Concordance of Genomic Alterations between Circulating-Free DNA and Tumour Tissue in Cancer Patients , 2019, Cancers.

[5]  David R. Riley,et al.  Noninvasive Detection of Microsatellite Instability and High Tumor Mutation Burden in Cancer Patients Treated with PD-1 Blockade , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  K. Pantel,et al.  Liquid biopsy in the era of immune-oncology. Is it ready for prime-time use for cancer patients? , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  Catalin C. Barbacioru,et al.  Validation of Microsatellite Instability Detection Using a Comprehensive Plasma-Based Genotyping Panel , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  Hongyu Zhao,et al.  Next-generation sequencing in liquid biopsy: cancer screening and early detection , 2019, Human Genomics.

[9]  R. Kurzrock,et al.  Next-Generation Sequencing of Tissue and Circulating Tumor DNA: The UC San Diego Moores Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy Experience with Breast Malignancies , 2019, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[10]  Tristan J. Lubinski,et al.  Orthogonal Comparison of Four Plasma NGS Tests With Tumor Suggests Technical Factors are a Major Source of Assay Discordance. , 2019, JCO precision oncology.

[11]  A. Thierry,et al.  Recent advances in circulating nucleic acids in oncology. , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  E. Felip,et al.  Clinical utility of plasma-based digital next-generation sequencing in patients with advance-stage lung adenocarcinomas with insufficient tumor samples for tissue genotyping , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  Doron Lipson,et al.  Analytical Validation of a Hybrid Capture–Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Genomic Profiling of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA , 2018, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[14]  K. Spindler,et al.  Measuring KRAS Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA by Droplet Digital PCR and Next-Generation Sequencing , 2018, Translational oncology.

[15]  Rachel Karchin,et al.  A machine learning approach for somatic mutation discovery , 2018, Science Translational Medicine.

[16]  K. Spindler,et al.  Total circulating cell-free DNA as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer prior to first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  P. Laurent-Puig,et al.  RAS mutation analysis in circulating tumor DNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the AGEO RASANC prospective multicenter study , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  C. García-Girón,et al.  Comparison of plasma ctDNA and tissue/cytology-based techniques for the detection of EGFR mutation status in advanced NSCLC: Spanish data subset from ASSESS , 2018, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[19]  C. Paweletz,et al.  Cell-Free DNA in Oncology: Gearing up for Clinic , 2017, Annals of laboratory medicine.

[20]  Y. Nishii,et al.  Utility of Liquid Biopsy by Improved PNA‐LNA PCR Clamp Method for Detecting EGFR Mutation at Initial Diagnosis of Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer: Observational Study of 190 Consecutive Cases in Clinical Practice , 2017, Clinical lung cancer.

[21]  B. Rini,et al.  Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cell-free circulating tumor DNA and tumor tissue in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: a pilot assessment of concordance , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[22]  Sam Angiuoli,et al.  Direct detection of early-stage cancers using circulating tumor DNA , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[23]  Marina N Nikiforova,et al.  Guidelines for Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Panels: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[24]  Dorota Kwapisz,et al.  The first liquid biopsy test approved. Is it a new era of mutation testing for non-small cell lung cancer? , 2017, Annals of translational medicine.

[25]  Marie-Cécile Le Deley,et al.  Circulating Cell-Free Tumor DNA Analysis of 50 Genes by Next-Generation Sequencing in the Prospective MOSCATO Trial , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  Glen J Weiss,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of two commercially available targeted next-generation sequencing platforms to assist oncology decision making , 2015, OncoTargets and therapy.

[27]  Eugenia G. Giannopoulou,et al.  The oestrogen receptor alpha-regulated lncRNA NEAT1 is a critical modulator of prostate cancer , 2014, Nature Communications.

[28]  Kai Ye,et al.  MSIsensor: microsatellite instability detection using paired tumor-normal sequence data , 2014, Bioinform..

[29]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Prognostic and predictive roles for circulating biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancer. , 2011, Future oncology.

[30]  Francisco M. De La Vega,et al.  Development of Personalized Tumor Biomarkers Using Massively Parallel Sequencing , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[31]  Claude-Alain H. Roten,et al.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform , 2009, Bioinform..