Finding the Important Factors in Large Discrete-Event Simulation: Sequential Bifurcation and its Applications

This contribution discusses experiments with many factors: the case study includes a simulation model with 92 factors.The experiments are guided by sequential bifurcation.This method is most efficient and effective if the true input/output behavior of the simulation model can be approximated through a first-order polynomial possibly augmented with two-factor interactions.The method is explained and illustrated through three related discrete-event simulation models.These models represent three supply chain configurations, studied for an Ericsson factory in Sweden.After simulating 21 scenarios (factor combinations) each replicated five times to account for noise a shortlist with the 11 most important factors is identified for the biggest of the three simulation models.

[1]  Chu‐Hua Kuei,et al.  Designing and Managing the Supply Chain Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies , 2000 .

[2]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[3]  Osman Balci,et al.  A methodology for certification of modeling and simulation applications , 2001, TOMC.

[4]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Why initial conditions are important [manufacturing simulation] , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[5]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[6]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .

[7]  J. Kleijnen Statistical tools for simulation practitioners , 1986 .

[8]  Steve Buckley,et al.  Panel session: opportunities for simulation in supply chain management , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[9]  R. Cheng Searching For Important Factors: Sequential Bifurcation Under Uncertainty , 1997, Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings,.

[10]  F. Persson,et al.  Performance simulation of supply chain designs , 2002 .

[11]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Dennis K. J. Lin,et al.  FORWARD SELECTION ERROR CONTROL IN THE ANALYSIS OF SUPERSATURATED DESIGNS , 1998 .

[13]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen Supply Chain Simulation : A Survey , 2003 .

[14]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  A methodology for the fitting and validation of metamodels in simulation , 2000 .

[15]  Bruce E. Ankenman,et al.  Controlled sequential bifurcation: a new factor-screening method for discrete-event simulation , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[16]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  State-of-the-Art Review: A User's Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments , 2005, INFORMS J. Comput..

[17]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Practice: why initial conditions are important , 2002, WSC '02.

[18]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  Sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of uncertain factors in a scenario tree model for classical swine fever virus introduction into The Netherlands , 2003 .

[19]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Searching for important factors in simulation models with many factors: Sequential bifurcation , 1997 .

[20]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis , 1982 .

[21]  Bernardus Wilhelmus Maria Bettonvil,et al.  Detection of important factors by sequential bifurcation , 1990 .

[22]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. , 1979 .

[23]  S. Lewis,et al.  Detection of interactions in experiments on large numbers of factors , 2001 .

[24]  Karen A. F. Copeland Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization , 2002 .