Toward a social conflict evolution model: Examining the adverse power of conflictual social interaction in online learning

This case study examined an authentic online learning phenomenon where social conflict, including harsh critique and negative tone, weaved throughout peer-moderated online discussions in an online class. Opening coding and content analysis were performed on 1306 message units and course artifacts. The results revealed that a model of social conflict evolution, that is, social conflict within the learning community evolved through five general phases including cultural initiation, social harmonization cycle, escalation of conflict, intervention and stabilization, and adjourning. The results also suggested strong relationships between social and learning interactions during these five phases of social conflict development. This study has theoretical and practical implications for designing and managing learning activities in online classes.

[1]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[2]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Learning or Succeeding? Conflict Regulation With Mastery or Performance Goals , 2007 .

[3]  Azy Barak,et al.  Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  M. Nicholson.  The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[5]  Hanna Salovaara,et al.  An exploration of students' strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  C. Gunawardena.  Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences , 1995 .

[7]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[8]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Thinking and Computer Conferencing: A Model and Tool to Assess Cognitive Presence , 2001 .

[9]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  The role of students' motivation in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Colin Sharp.  Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[11]  J. Gackenbach.  Psychology and the Internet : intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications , 1998 .

[12]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL , 2007 .

[13]  Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.  Peer Relationships, Motivation, and Academic Performance at School. , 2005 .

[14]  M. Deutsch.  The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[15]  James Laffey,et al.  Exploring the relationships between students' academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[17]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[18]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Performance-Approach and Performance-Avoidance Goals: When Uncertainty Makes a Difference , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Achievement Goals in Social Interactions: Learning with Mastery vs. Performance Goals , 2007 .

[20]  Dianne Conrad.  Inhibition, Integrity and Etiquette Among Online Learners: The Art of Niceness , 2002 .

[21]  John Suler,et al.  The Bad Boys of Cyberspace: Deviant Behavior in a Multimedia Chat Community , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[22]  K. Wentzel.  Social Relationships and Motivation in Middle School: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers , 1998 .

[23]  H. Buelens,et al.  Electronic discussion forums in medical ethics education: the impact of didactic guidelines and netiquette , 2007, Medical education.

[24]  F. Fischer,et al.  Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning , 2005 .

[25]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[26]  S. Utz.  Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. , 2000 .

[27]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[28]  Chih-Hsiung Tu,et al.  An examination of social presence to increase interaction in online classes , 2000 .

[29]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[30]  C. Tu,et al.  The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online Classes , 2002 .

[31]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of controversy on cognitive perspective taking. , 1977 .

[32]  Andrea Chester,et al.  Online Teaching: Encouraging Collaboration through Anonymity , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  A. Joinson.  Disinhibition and the Internet , 2007 .

[34]  Rudolf H. Moos,et al.  Work stress and the stress‐buffering roles of work and family resources , 1982 .

[35]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Applying multilevel modelling to content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups , 2007 .

[36]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Social presence in online discussion groups: testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning , 2008 .

[37]  Anne-Naarie G. Hammond.  How Do You Write "Yes"?: A Study on the Effectiveness of Online Dispute Resolution , 2003 .

[38]  Alma Mintu-Wimsatt,et al.  Netiquette: Make it Part of Your Syllabus , 2010 .

[39]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  MAXIMIZING THE BENEFITS OF TASK CONFLICT: THE ROLE OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[40]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses , 2009, Internet High. Educ..

[41]  Yangjoo Park,et al.  Being polite while fulfilling different discourse functions in online classroom discussions , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Vance A. Durrington,et al.  Relationship between Students' Motivation and their Participation in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2011 .

[43]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines , 1998 .

[44]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[45]  Ellen D. Wagner,et al.  In Support of a Functional Definition of Interaction , 1994 .

[46]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Learner preferences and achievement under differing amounts of learner practice , 1998 .

[47]  Diane Celia Hodges,et al.  Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice , 1998 .

[48]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Facilitating online discussions effectively , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[49]  John Suler,et al.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[50]  Andrea Chester.  Text‐based MOOing in educational practice: experiences of disinhibition , 2006 .

[51]  Regina O. Smith.  Adult Learning and the Emotional Self in Virtual Online Contexts. , 2008 .

[52]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Extending the Traditional Classroom Through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation , 2006 .

[53]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[54]  Diane L. Miller,et al.  The Stages of Group Development: A Retrospective Study of Dynamic Team Processes , 2009 .

[55]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Conflict Elaboration and Cognitive Outcomes , 2004 .

[56]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  Kristin Walker.  Activity Systems and Conflict Resolution in an Online Professional Communication Course , 2004 .

[58]  W. Doise.  The social development of the intellect , 1984 .