Objective Assessment of Sonographic: Quality II Acquisition Information Spectrum

This paper describes a task-based, information-theoretic approach to the assessment of image quality in diagnostic sonography. We expand the Kullback-Leibler divergence metric J, which quantifies the diagnostic information contained within recorded radio-frequency echo signals, into a spatial-frequency integral comprised of two spectral components: one describes patient features for low-contrast diagnostic tasks and the other describes instrumentation properties. The latter quantity is the acquisition information spectrum (AIS), which measures the density of object information that an imaging system is able to transfer to the echo data at each spatial frequency. AIS is derived based on unique properties of acoustic scattering in tissues that generate object contrast. Predictions made by the J integral expression were validated through Monte Carlo studies using echo-signal data from simulated lesions. Our analysis predicts the diagnostic performance of any sonographic system at specific diagnostic tasks based on engineering properties of the instrument that constitute image quality.

[1]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[2]  R. Shaw,et al.  The Equivalent Quantum Efficiency of the Photographic Process , 1963 .

[3]  H. Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[5]  Jie Liu,et al.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks Simulating Malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[7]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  J. Liu,et al.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks simulating malignant and benign breast lesions with ultrasound , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[11]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  An Adaptive Filter to Approximate the Bayesian Strategy for Sonographic Beamforming , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  J. J. Gisvold,et al.  Ultrasound transmission computed tomography of the breast. , 1984, Radiology.

[14]  J. Goodman Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns , 1963 .

[15]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[16]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  H. Ermert,et al.  An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  Matthew A Kupinski,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality VI: imaging in radiation therapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[21]  Robert F. Wagner,et al.  Quadratic Tasks And The Ideal Observer , 1987, Medical Imaging.

[22]  M.F. Insana,et al.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[24]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Fundamental correlation lengths of coherent speckle in medical ultrasonic images , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[26]  Isaac N. Bankman,et al.  Handbook of medical imaging , 2000 .

[27]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Medical Imaging-The Assessment of Image Quality , 1996 .

[28]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Objective Assessment of Sonographic Quality I: Task Information , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  S. Kullback,et al.  Information Theory and Statistics , 1959 .

[31]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .