Disruption Prediction Approaches Using Machine Learning Tools in Tokamaks

Nuclear fusion is one of the best options to achieve a virtually limitless energy source in the future. However, sustaining burning plasma reactions is very challenging because disruptive events cause the loss of plasma confinement and damages to the tokamak machine. Thus, reproducing a nuclear fusion reaction on Earth represents an actual scientific and technical challenge. Next generation machines must be able to predict, mitigate or avoid the disruptions but the present understanding of the phenomenon has not yet gone so far as to provide a physical model describing their root cause. On the contrary, a large quantity of experimental disruption data exists. For these reason, in the last decades, machine learning techniques have been applied to design alarm systems both for mitigating or to actively avoid approaching disruptions. More recently, the disruption predictor concept has been evolving toward a more complex system, able to detect the proximity of the plasma state to the boundaries of the operational space free from disruptions in order to schedule avoidance strategies rather than mitigation actions. This system should also be able to determine which type of disruption is about to occur in order to efficiently take suitable disruption avoidance actions. This paper reports an overview of machine learning algorithms as tools for disruption prediction and classification at JET, the world's largest operational plasma physics experiment, located at Culham Centre for Fusion Energy in Oxfordshire, UK. Both traditional neural network models for disruption prediction and manifold learning approaches as a tool for plasma operational space mapping and visualization, disruption prediction and classification, are described.

[1]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[2]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Overview of manifold learning techniques for the investigation of disruptions on JET , 2013 .

[3]  A. Murari,et al.  Unbiased and non-supervised learning methods for disruption prediction at JET , 2009 .

[4]  Piergiorgio Sonato,et al.  A prediction tool for real-time application in the disruption protection system at JET , 2007 .

[5]  Massimo Camplani,et al.  Tracking of the plasma states in a nuclear fusion device using SOMs , 2011, Neural Computing and Applications.

[6]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[7]  J-Text Team,et al.  Hybrid neural network for density limit disruption prediction and avoidance on J-TEXT tokamak , 2018 .

[8]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[9]  Herbert Jaeger,et al.  The''echo state''approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks , 2001 .

[10]  Barbara Cannas,et al.  Improvements in disruption prediction at ASDEX Upgrade , 2015 .

[11]  Henry Markram,et al.  The "Liquid Computer": A Novel Strategy for Real-Time Computing on Time Series , 2002 .

[12]  A. Fanni,et al.  Manifold learning to interpret JET high-dimensional operational space , 2013 .

[13]  J. Contributors,et al.  Survey of disruption causes at JET , 2011 .

[14]  Andrea Murari,et al.  An advanced disruption predictor for JET tested in a simulated real-time environment , 2010 .

[15]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  GTM: The Generative Topographic Mapping , 1998, Neural Computation.

[16]  B. Cannas,et al.  An adaptive real-time disruption predictor for ASDEX Upgrade , 2010 .

[17]  A. Murari,et al.  Automatic disruption classification in JET with the ITER-like wall , 2015 .

[18]  Jochen J. Steil,et al.  Online stability of backpropagation-decorrelation recurrent learning , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[19]  Alessandra Fanni,et al.  Disruption prediction with adaptive neural networks for ASDEX Upgrade , 2011 .

[20]  R. Yoshino Neural-net predictor for beta limit disruptions in JT-60U , 2005 .

[21]  G. Pautasso,et al.  Mapping of the ASDEX Upgrade Operational Space for Disruption Prediction , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[22]  Daniel Asimov,et al.  The grand tour: a tool for viewing multidimensional data , 1985 .

[23]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Automatic disruption classification based on manifold learning for real-time applications on JET , 2013 .

[24]  J. Manickam,et al.  Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions , 2007 .

[25]  Mei-Ling Shyu,et al.  A Survey on Deep Learning , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..