Growing Qawm: an Evidence-Driven Declarative Model of Afghan Power Structures

By means of evidence-driven and declaratively implemented social simulation, we grow qawm — solidarity networks in Afghanistan. The study of qawm lends insight into the structural and processual dynamics of Afghan society. In particular, we concentrate on the evolution of power structures. An agent-based computational model is presented whose ontology borrows from neopatrimonialism, a notion of power prevalent in contemporary conflicts. In this model, agents' structural arrangement, behavior and cognition are informed by qualitative data derived from case studies on Afghanistan. The simulation results suggest that the emergence of qawm and, hence, the fragmentation of Afghan society are systemic and lead to a constant drain of resources. Cross-validation between the simulated network and a target system network reveals that qawm exhibit small world characteristics.

[1]  Ali A. Abdi,et al.  The Criminalization of the State in Africa , 1999 .

[2]  G. Poggi.  Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[3]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Heuristic reasoning about uncertainty: an artificial intelligence approach , 1984 .

[4]  Myron Weiner,et al.  The Politics of Social Transformation in Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan , 1994 .

[5]  W. Outhwaite,et al.  New philosophies of social science , 1987 .

[6]  B. Edmonds,et al.  Sociology and Simulation: Statistical and Qualitative Cross‐Validation1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Antonio Giustozzi,et al.  War and Peace Economies of Afghanistan's Strongmen , 2007 .

[8]  Shah M. Tarzi,et al.  Afghanistan in 1992: A Hobbesian State of Nature , 1993 .

[9]  Sayed Askar Mousavi.  The Hazaras of Afghanistan , 1997 .

[10]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[11]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Does Empirical Embeddedness Matter? Methodological Issues on Agent-Based Models for Analytical Social Science , 2005, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[12]  R. Merton.  Social Structure and Anomie , 1938 .

[13]  Olivier Roy,et al.  Afghanistan: From Holy War to Civil War , 1995 .

[14]  L. Cederman.  Modeling the Size of Wars: From Billiard Balls to Sandpiles , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[15]  J. Finnigan.  How Nature Works; The science of self-organized criticality , 2001 .

[16]  W. Outhwaite.  New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory , 1991 .

[17]  Scott Moss.  Canonical Tasks, Environments and Models for Social Simulation , 2000, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[18]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[19]  Scott Moss,et al.  Critical Incident Management: An Empirically Derived Computational Model , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[20]  Joshua M Epstein,et al.  Modeling civil violence: An agent-based computational approach , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Sayed Askar Mousavi,et al.  The Hazaras of Afghanistan: an historical, cultural, economic and political study , 1999 .

[22]  Scott Moss,et al.  Control metaphors in the modelling of economic learning and decision-making behaviour , 1995 .

[23]  John Cartwright,et al.  Warlord Politics and African States , 1998 .

[24]  Stephen Marks,et al.  Durkheim's Theory of Anomie , 1974, American Journal of Sociology.