Challenges in the areal measurement of surface roughness and shape at the micro and nanoscale

Measuring surface roughness accurately at the micro and nano scale presents several challenges. While optical techniques can be used to rapidly measure large areas, significant variations can be found between results from different techniques on similar samples. In the present work, a comparison has been made between the results of two different systems using interference microscopy and AFM to make measurements at the same place on the same sample. Two samples were prepared on silicon wafers by marking them with a multi-scale pattern using a photoresist process of lithography from an optical mask, followed by reactive ion etching. One was left bare and the other was prepared with a rough layer of hydroxyapatite before measuring at the chosen positions. Comparison of the results showed that while the general shapes of the measured surface microstructures were similar, several differences were found. For example, there was a variation of up to 7% between techniques in the measurement of the depths of the etched features and artefacts were also visible at square edges. These results show the need to pay careful attention to instrument calibration and probe/surface interactions in order to improve the accuracy of surface characterization of surface roughness and topography.

[1]  Laurent Robert,et al.  Position-referenced microscopy for live cell culture monitoring , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[2]  T Kitsugi,et al.  Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  K. Du,et al.  Nanometer to micrometer scaled inhomogeneous etching of bulk metallic glasses by ion sputtering , 2013 .

[4]  R. Leach Optical measurement of surface topography , 2011 .

[5]  Abdel-Ouahab Boudraa,et al.  Teager-Kaiser Energy and Higher-Order Operators in White-Light Interference Microscopy for Surface Shape Measurement , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[6]  J C Wyant,et al.  Fringe modulation skewing effect in white-light vertical scanning interferometry. , 2000, Applied optics.

[7]  Paul Montgomery,et al.  White light scanning interferometry adapted for large-area optical analysis of thick and rough hydroxyapatite layers. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[8]  Erik Novak,et al.  Performance advances in interferometric optical profilers for imaging and testing , 2008 .

[9]  Eric Fogarassy,et al.  Interference microscopy for nanometric surface microstructure analysis in excimer laser processing of silicon for flat panel displays , 2003 .

[10]  Julia Lobera,et al.  Measurement of Steep Surfaces Using White Light Interferometry , 2010 .

[11]  M. Maitz,et al.  Kinetics of hydroxyapatite deposition on solid substrates modified by sequential implantation of Ca and P ions. Part I. FTIR and Raman spectroscopy study , 2004 .

[12]  Masahito Katto,et al.  Microstructures formation on titanium plate by femtosecond laser ablation , 2007 .