Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model

Much experimental evidence indicates that choice depends on the status quo or reference level: changes of reference point often lead to reversals of preference. We present a reference-dependent theory of consumer choice, which explains such effects by a deformation of indifference curves about the reference point. The central assumption of the theory is that losses and disadvantages have greater impact on preferences than gains and advantages. Implications of loss aversion for economic behavior are considered.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[2]  David Cohen,et al.  Judicial Choice and Disparities between Measures of Economic Values , 1992, Osgoode Hall Law Journal.

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Manohar U. Kalwani,et al.  A Price Expectations Model of Customer Brand Choice , 1990 .

[5]  J. Knetsch.  The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. , 1989 .

[6]  P. Wakker.  Additive Representations of Preferences: A New Foundation of Decision Analysis , 1988 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[8]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[9]  G. Loewenstein.  Frames of mind in intertemporal choice , 1988 .

[10]  J. A. Sinden,et al.  The Persistence of Evaluation Disparities , 1987 .

[11]  William D. Schulze,et al.  The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value , 1987 .

[12]  Joel Huber,et al.  An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks , 1987 .

[13]  David S. Brookshire,et al.  Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures , 1987 .

[14]  R. C. Bishop,et al.  Assessing the validity of contingent valuation: Three field experiments , 1986 .

[15]  Russell S. Winer,et al.  A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. , 1986 .

[16]  D. Kahneman,et al.  CHAPTER EIGHT. Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market , 2004 .

[17]  Alan L. Olmstead,et al.  Rationing without government: the West Coast gas famine of 1920 , 1985 .

[18]  G. Constantinides.  The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence: Discussion , 1985 .

[19]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[20]  Sara van de Geer,et al.  The Relativity of Utility: Evidence from Panel Data , 1985 .

[21]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[23]  R. Easterlin.  Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence , 1974 .

[24]  B. V. Praag,et al.  The welfare function of income in Belgium: An empirical investigation , 1971 .

[25]  L. Hudson.  Frames of Mind: Ability, Perception and Self-Perception in the Arts and Sciences , 1970 .

[26]  S. Karlin,et al.  Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences , 1962 .

[27]  G. Debreu.  Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory , 1959 .