The importance of the rat hippocampus for learning the structure of visual arrays

It has been assumed that the integrity of the rodent hippocampus is required for learning the spatial distribution of visual elements in an array. Formally assessing this assumption is, however, far from straightforward as standard tests are amenable to alternative strategies. In order to provide a stringent test of this ability rats were trained on three concurrent visual discriminations in a water tank in which the stimuli in each pair of discriminations contained exactly the same elements but they differed in their spatial arrangement e.g. A|B vs. its mirror image B|A. Such ‘structural’ discriminations are a specific subtype of ‘configural’ or ‘nonlinear’ tasks. Following acquisition half of the rats received hippocampal lesions and all rats were retrained on the structural discriminations. Hippocampal lesions impaired the ability to relearn these ‘structural’ discriminations. In contrast, two other groups of rats with similar hippocampal lesions showed no impairment on relearning two non‐structural, configural discriminations: transverse patterning and biconditional learning. All three tasks used the same apparatus, the same stimulus elements, and similar training regimes. Superior performance by the rats with hippocampal lesions during a generalization decrement probe showed that hippocampal lesions had diminished sensitivity to ‘structural’ features on the biconditional task. While the rat hippocampus need not be required for all configural learning, it is important for the special case when the spatial arrangements of the elements are critical. This ability may be a prerequisite for the creation of mental snapshots, which underlie episodic memory.

[1]  R. Kesner,et al.  Effects of hippocampal and parietal cortex lesions on the processing of multiple-object scenes. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.

[2]  L. Jarrard,et al.  The hippocampus and inhibitory learning: a ‘Gray’ area? , 2004, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Place memory and scene memory: effects of fornix transection in the monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  P. Holland,et al.  Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage , 1992, Hippocampus.

[5]  J. W. Rudy,et al.  Some properties of configural learning: an investigation of the transverse-patterning problem. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia , 1989, Psychobiology.

[7]  H Eichenbaum,et al.  Functional organization of the hippocampal memory system. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. Gaffan Scene-Specific Memory for Objects: A Model of Episodic Memory Impairment in Monkeys with Fornix Transection , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  T. Robbins,et al.  Comparative effects of excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus and septum/diagonal band on conditional visual discrimination and spatial learning , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration , 1995, Hippocampus.

[11]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  T. Bussey,et al.  Fornix Lesions Can Facilitate Acquisition of the Transverse Patterning Task: A Challenge for “Configural” Theories of Hippocampal Function , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Kimble Possible inhibitory functions of the hippocampus , 1969 .

[14]  J. Büttner-Ennever The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 3rd edn. By George Paxinos and Charles Watson. (Pp. xxxiii+80; illustrated; £$69.95 paperback; ISBN 0 12 547623; comes with CD‐ROM.) San Diego: Academic Press. 1996. , 1997 .

[15]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues: II. Neural manipulations and their implications. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: principles of cortical and hippocampal function. , 2001, Psychological review.

[17]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[18]  M. McKERNAN,et al.  Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: a challenge to configural association theory. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[19]  I Q Whishaw,et al.  Acquisition and retention by hippocampal rats of simple, conditional, and configural tasks using tactile and olfactory cues: implications for hippocampal function. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  R. Douglas,et al.  The hippocampus and behavior. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  L. Swanson The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, George Paxinos, Charles Watson (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1982), vii + 153, $35.00, ISBN: 0 125 47620 5 , 1984 .

[22]  J. Pearce,et al.  Failure of a landmark to restrict spatial learning based on the shape of the environment , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[23]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Contrasting Hippocampal and Perirhinalcortex Function using Immediate Early Gene Imaging , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  R. Morris,et al.  Contingent versus incidental context processing during conditioning: Dissociation after excitotoxic hippocampal plus dentate gyrus lesions , 1998, Hippocampus.

[25]  J W Rudy,et al.  Rats with damage to the hippocampal-formation are impaired on the transverse-patterning problem but not on elemental discriminations. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[26]  Jules Davidoff,et al.  A particular difficulty in discriminating between mirror images , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  J. Pearce,et al.  Discrimination of structure: II. Feature binding. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[28]  J. Gray The neuropsychology of anxiety. , 1985, Issues in mental health nursing.

[29]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Seahorse wins all races: Hippocampus participates in both linear and non-linear visual discrimination learning , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[30]  J. Pearce,et al.  Discrimination of structure: I. Implications for connectionist theories of discrimination learning. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  H. Eichenbaum A cortical–hippocampal system for declarative memory , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  N. McNaughton,et al.  Comparison between the behavioural effects of septal and hippocampal lesions: A review , 1983, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[33]  D. Bannerman,et al.  Conditional discriminations based on external and internal cues in rats with cytotoxic hippocampal lesions. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  J. Pearce Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model. , 1994, Psychological review.

[35]  M. W. Brown,et al.  Novel spatial arrangements of familiar visual stimuli promote activity in the rat hippocampal formation but not the parahippocampal cortices: a c-fos expression study , 2004, Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Aggleton,et al.  The effects of lesions to the fornix and dorsomedial thalamus on concurrent discrimination learning by rats , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[37]  E Save,et al.  Object exploration and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in hooded rats following damage to parietal cortex or hippocampal formation. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[38]  M. Gluck,et al.  Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory , 1993, Hippocampus.

[39]  M. Petrides,et al.  Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Rosemary A. Cowell,et al.  Double Dissociation between the Effects of Peri-Postrhinal Cortex and Hippocampal Lesions on Tests of Object Recognition and Spatial Memory: Heterogeneity of Function within the Temporal Lobe , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Pearce,et al.  Neural systems underlying episodic memory: insights from animal research. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  R. Kesner,et al.  The role of hippocampal subregions in detecting spatial novelty. , 2005, Behavioral neuroscience.

[43]  P. Holland,et al.  Hippocampal lesions enhance configural learning by reducing proactive interference , 1998, Hippocampus.

[44]  J W Rudy,et al.  A comparison of kainic acid plus colchicine and ibotenic acid-induced hippocampal formation damage on four configural tasks in rats. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  J. Pearce,et al.  The discrimination of structure: III. Representation of spatial relationships. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[46]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Different Contributions of the Hippocampus and Perirhinal Cortex to Recognition Memory , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  H Eichenbaum,et al.  The hippocampus and transverse patterning guided by olfactory cues. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.

[48]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix‐fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations , 1997, Hippocampus.

[49]  D. Mumby,et al.  Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts. , 2002, Learning & memory.

[50]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[51]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.