An integrated multi-criteria scenario evaluation web tool for participatory land-use planning in urbanized areas: The Ecosystem Portfolio Model

Land-use land-cover change is one of the most important and direct drivers of changes in ecosystem functions and services. Given the complexity of the decision-making, there is a need for Internet-based decision support systems with scenario evaluation capabilities to help planners, resource managers and communities visualize, compare and consider trade-offs among the many values at stake in land use planning. This article presents details on an Ecosystem Portfolio Model (EPM) prototype that integrates ecological, socio-economic information and associated values of relevance to decision-makers and stakeholders. The EPM uses a multi-criteria scenario evaluation framework, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) analysis and spatially-explicit land-use/land-cover change-sensitive models to characterize changes in important land-cover related ecosystem values related to ecosystem services and functions, land parcel prices, and community quality-of-life (QoL) metrics. Parameters in the underlying models can be modified through the interface, allowing users in a facilitated group setting to explore simultaneously issues of scientific uncertainty and divergence in the preferences of stakeholders. One application of the South Florida EPM prototype reported in this article shows the modeled changes (which are significant) in aggregate ecological value, landscape patterns and fragmentation, biodiversity potential and ecological restoration potential for current land uses compared to the 2050 land-use scenario. Ongoing refinements to EPM, and future work especially in regard to modifiable sea level rise scenarios are also discussed.

[1]  Ralph Root,et al.  A framework for ecological decision support systems: Building the right systems and building the systems right , 2001 .

[2]  David Gilvear,et al.  James R. Karr and Ellen W. Chu, Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring , 1999 .

[3]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[4]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Florida’s unenviable position with respect to sea level rise , 2011 .

[5]  David Salvesen,et al.  Collaborative planning for wetlands and wildlife : issues and examples , 1995 .

[6]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgment , 1998 .

[7]  Lance Gunderson,et al.  Resilience and the Behavior of Large‐Scale Systems , 2003 .

[8]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[9]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[10]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  S. Brody Ecosystem Planning in Florida: Solving Regional Problems through Local Decision-making , 2008 .

[12]  J. Palmer Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts , 2004 .

[13]  Richard Bernknopf,et al.  Estimating the Cumulative Ecological Effect of Local Scale Landscape Changes in South Florida , 2012, Environmental Management.

[14]  S. Ishman,et al.  Impact of anthropogenic development on coastal ground-water hydrology in southeastern Florida, 1900-2000 , 2005 .

[15]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  The Foundations of Decision Analysis , 1968, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[16]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[17]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[18]  D. Niemeijer Developing indicators for environmental policy: data-driven and theory-driven approaches examined by example , 2002 .

[19]  E. Ostrom Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems , 2010, American Economic Review.

[20]  J. Kirwan,et al.  OUTCOME SERIES SERIES EDITORS: D. L. SCOTT AND A. SILMAN QUALITY OF LIFE MEASURES , 1996 .

[21]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Working Paper 5219 Equilibrium Fictions A Cognitive Approach to Societal Rigidity , 2010 .

[22]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the Socioeconomic Dimension of Long-term Socioecological Research , 2006 .

[23]  Richard Bernknopf,et al.  The South Florida Ecosystem Portfolio Model: A Web-Enabled Multicriteria Land Use Planning Decision Support System , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  S. Rosen Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  Sheila Peck Planning for Biodiversity: Issues And Examples , 1998 .

[26]  Knut L. Seip,et al.  Legitimacy and quality of multi‐criteria environmental policy analysis: a meta analysis of five MCE studies in Norway , 2001 .

[27]  L. Gunderson Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application , 2000 .

[28]  F. Luz Participatory landscape ecology: A basis for acceptance and implementation , 2000 .

[29]  Richard Bernknopf,et al.  The South Florida Ecosystem Portfolio Model - A Map-Based Multicriteria Ecological, Economic, and Community Land-Use Planning Tool , 2009 .

[30]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[31]  R. DeFries,et al.  Trade‐offs in Land‐Use Decisions: Towards a Framework for Assessing Multiple Ecosystem Responses to Land‐Use Change , 2013 .

[32]  M. Alberti The Effects of Urban Patterns on Ecosystem Function , 2005 .

[33]  J. M. Grove,et al.  Integrating Social Science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network: Social Dimensions of Ecological Change and Ecological Dimensions of Social Change , 2004, Ecosystems.

[34]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[35]  Paul H. Gobster,et al.  Interpreting landscape change: Measured biophysical change and surrounding social context , 2007 .

[36]  Lynne M. Westphal,et al.  The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences , 2004 .

[37]  Virginia H. Dale,et al.  Tools to Aid Environmental Decision Making , 2012 .

[38]  L. Zadeh A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO FUZZY QUANTIFIERS IN NATURAL LANGUAGES , 1983 .

[39]  W. Stewart,et al.  Community identities as visions for landscape change , 2004 .

[40]  S. Mulkey Climate change and land use in Florida: Interdependencies and opportunities , 2007 .

[41]  M. Burgman Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management: Experts, stakeholders and elicitation , 2005 .

[42]  K. Byrd,et al.  Tools and methods for evaluating and refining alternative futures for coastal ecosystem management—the Puget Sound Ecosystem Portfolio Model , 2011 .

[43]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation , 2002 .

[44]  Lisa A. Wainger,et al.  Measuring Ecosystem Service Benefits: The Use of Landscape Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Trades and Compensation , 2003 .

[45]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management , 2004 .

[46]  Michael C Runge,et al.  Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[47]  Laura M. Norman,et al.  Developing an ecosystem services online decision support tool to assess the impacts of climate change and urban growth in the santa cruz watershed; where we live, work, and play , 2010 .

[48]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.

[49]  Miley W. Merkhofer,et al.  Assessment, Refinement, and Narrowing of Options , 1999 .

[50]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Map-centred exploratory approach to multiple criteria spatial decision making , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[51]  G. Fry,et al.  The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[52]  Jianchu Xu,et al.  Multiple Impacts of Land-Use/Cover Change , 2006 .

[53]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Ecosystems and land use change , 2004 .

[54]  R. Scholes,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends , 2005 .

[55]  H. Possingham,et al.  Active Adaptive Management for Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[56]  J. Karr,et al.  Restoring life in running waters : better biological monitoring , 1998 .

[57]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change , 2006 .

[58]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[59]  L. Pearlstine,et al.  Assessing state-wide biodiversity in the Florida Gap analysis project. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[60]  Claus Rinner,et al.  Exploring multicriteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: A case study of residential quality evaluation , 2005, J. Geogr. Syst..

[61]  E. Swain,et al.  Application of FTLOADDS to Simulate Flow, Salinity, and Surface-Water Stage in the Southern Everglades, Florida , 2007 .

[62]  W. Solecki,et al.  Human–environment interactions in South Florida's Everglades region: Systems of ecological degradation and restoration , 1999, Urban Ecosystems.