Wave energy extraction from device arrays : experimental investigation in a large wave facility

Multiple wave energy devices supported by a common structure represent one possible method of efficiently converting ocean wave energy into electricity. In this study, experimental measurements of multiple small-scale wave energy devices are reported to assist the development and validation of numerical models. Through observation and measurement, the response of two float geometries subjected to a range of wave conditions and device settings were determined. A range of regular wave conditions were identified that caused a linear relationship to occur between the heave displacement amplitude of the float and the incident wave amplitude. These test cases will enable comparisons to be made with linear simulations of response. Tests conducted in various wave conditions have highlighted the capability of altering the device response by changing the equilibrium draft of one float geometry. Additional damping on the upper surface of the float, due to wave overtopping, could be exploited as a method of limiting the heave response of the device in large amplitude waves. The influence of hydrodynamic interactions on arrays of closely spaced devices has been experimentally investigated for devices subjected to regular and irregular wave conditions. The magnitude and occurrence of interactions and their affect on the individual device response is demonstrably dependent on the incident wave frequency and device separation distance. Compared to an isolated device, positive interactions result in higher average power outputs for an array of devices at certain wave frequencies. Positive interactions occuring at particular wave frequencies are balanced by negative interactions at other wave frequencies, in agreement with published numerical studies of array performance. Varying the level of mechanical damping applied to the float through the power take-off system results in a frequency shift of the calculated power transfer function and alters the motion path of the float. This finding implies that the level of generator torque could be used as an alternative method to tune the response of the device based on the measured incident wave-field. Several time-averaged and time-varying approaches to simulating the response of a wave energy device subjected to wave-field forcing and undergoing free response have been studied. By comparing the simulated and measured responses, the feasibility of using linear and non-linear force terms in a time-varying model has been assessed. In general, single degree-of-freedom simulations based on linear hydrodynamic parameters tend to over-predict device response amplitudes, requiring the application of additional damping. The simulation approach which resulted in the closest agreement with measured responses required the combination of linear diffraction force and radiation added mass terms with non-linear drag and buoyancy force terms, as well as body inertia and gravity forces. This approach goes part way to simulating the complex time-varying hydrodynamics associated with a wave energy device subjected to wave-field forcing.

[1]  Peter Stansby,et al.  Limiting heave response of a wave energy device by draft adjustment with upper surface immersion , 2009 .

[2]  D. Yue,et al.  Interactions among multiple three-dimensional bodies in water waves: an exact algebraic method , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Paul M. Hagemeijer,et al.  A New Model For The Kinematics Of Large Ocean Waves-Application As a Design Wave , 1991 .

[4]  Mats Leijon,et al.  Tracking a Wave Power Buoy Using a Network Camera: System Analysis and First Results , 2009 .

[5]  Subrata Kumar Chakrabarti,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Hydrodynamics and Vibration , 2002 .

[6]  Peter Stansby,et al.  An Experimental Study of Closely Spaced Point Absorber Arrays , 2008 .

[7]  Masataka Fujino,et al.  On the hydroelastic responses of a very large floating structure in waves , 1999 .

[8]  T. Stallard,et al.  Optimisation of a Heterogenous Array of Heaving Floats , 2009 .

[9]  Peter Stansby,et al.  Control of a Variable Speed Generator to Optimise Output from a Heaving Wave Energy Device , 2008 .

[10]  Johannes Falnes,et al.  Optimum Control of Oscillation of Wave-Energy Converters , 2002 .

[11]  Raymond Alcorn,et al.  Case study feasibility analysis of the Pelamis wave energy convertor in Ireland, Portugal and North America , 2010 .

[12]  Pourya Omidvar,et al.  Wave loading on bodies in the free surface using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) , 2010 .

[13]  Mats Leijon,et al.  Experimental results of rectification and filtration from an offshore wave energy system , 2009 .

[14]  R. E. Taylor,et al.  A comparison of localized finite element formulations for two‐dimensional wave diffraction and radiation problems , 1981 .

[15]  D. V. Evans,et al.  Trapping and Near-Trapping by Arrays of Cylinders in Waves , 1999 .

[16]  Torkel Bjarte-Larsson,et al.  Laboratory experiment on heaving body with hydraulic power take-off and latching control , 2006 .

[17]  Vengatesan Venugopal,et al.  The effect of wave period filtering on wave power extraction and device tuning , 2007 .

[18]  Kane Sing Lok,et al.  Optimisation of the Output of a Heaving Wave Energy Converter , 2010 .

[19]  Julien De Rouck,et al.  Bottom slamming on heaving point absorber wave energy devices , 2010 .

[20]  Vengatesan Venugopal,et al.  Analysis of potentialpower output of a device using a wave by wave approach , 2009 .

[21]  D. Evans,et al.  Arrays of three-dimensional wave-energy absorbers , 1981 .

[22]  S. D. Weller,et al.  Response of a Small Array Due to Irregular Waves: Comparison to Predictions Based On Measured Regular Wave Response , 2010 .

[23]  M. Simon Multiple scattering in arrays of axisymmetric wave-energy devices. Part 1. A matrix method using a plane-wave approximation , 1982 .

[24]  Robert Banasiak,et al.  Modelling of hydraulic performance and wave energy extraction by a point absorber in heave , 2004 .

[25]  T. Stallard,et al.  Experimental measurements of irregular wave interaction factors in closely spaced arrays , 2009 .

[26]  J. N. Newman,et al.  Wave diffraction by a long array of cylinders , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Mats Leijon,et al.  Farm size comparison with analytical model of linear generator wave energy converters , 2007 .

[28]  Leo H. Holthuijsen Waves in Oceanic and Coastal Waters: Spectral analysis , 2007 .

[29]  Julian Wolfram,et al.  On the estimation of Morison force coefficients and their predictive accuracy for very rough circular cylinders , 1999 .

[30]  N. Huang,et al.  A new view of nonlinear water waves: the Hilbert spectrum , 1999 .

[31]  Spyros A. Mavrakos,et al.  Hydrodynamic coefficients for groups of interacting vertical axisymmetric bodies , 1991 .

[32]  Paul Taylor,et al.  The shape of large surface waves on the open sea and the Draupner New Year wave , 2004 .

[33]  Vengatesan Venugopal,et al.  Wave period group statistics for real sea waves and wave energy extraction , 2006 .

[34]  T. Sarpkaya,et al.  Mechanics of wave forces on offshore structures , 1981 .

[35]  Peter Stansby,et al.  Transformation of Wave Spectra across a Line of Wave Devices , 2009 .

[36]  S. D. Weller,et al.  Float Response within an Array: Numerical and Experimental Comparison , 2008 .

[37]  D. V. Evans,et al.  Approximation of wave forces on cylinder arrays , 1984 .

[38]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Efficient Frequency-Domain Analysis of Dynamic Response for the Multi-Body Wave Energy Converter in Multi-Directional Waves , 2008 .

[39]  D. Evans Maximum wave-power absorption under motion constraints , 1981 .

[40]  Ling Qian,et al.  CFD Modeling of Wave Loads on Offshore Wave Energy Devices , 2008 .

[41]  Sarah Louise Bellew,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF THE RESPONSE OF GROUPS OF WAVE ENERGY DEVICES , 2011 .

[42]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  Comparison of latching control strategies for a heaving wave energy device in random sea , 2004 .

[43]  V. Venugopal,et al.  Optimal configurations of wave energy device arrays , 2010 .

[44]  M Kashiwagi Non-linear simulations of wave-induced motions of a floating body by means of the mixed Eulerian-Lagrangian method , 2000 .

[45]  J. Falnes Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems: Linear Interactions Including Wave-Energy Extraction , 2002 .

[46]  Derek Jones,et al.  Renewable Energy Policy and Politics: A Handbook for Decision-Making , 2009 .

[47]  K. Budal Theory for Absorption of Wave Power by a System of Interacting Bodies , 1977 .

[48]  J. Falnes Radiation impedance matrix and optimum power absorption for interacting oscillators in surface waves , 1980 .

[49]  Robert Banasiak,et al.  Performance of a point absorber heaving with respect to a floating platform , 2007 .

[50]  C. Chevalier,et al.  High-resolution metocean modelling at EMEC's (UK) marine energy test sites , 2009 .

[51]  J. Falnes,et al.  Wave-power absorption by parallel rows of interacting oscillating bodies , 1982 .

[52]  Odd M. Faltinsen,et al.  Water entry and exit of a horizontal circular cylinder , 2005 .

[53]  Duarte Valério,et al.  Optimisation of wave energy extraction with the Archimedes Wave Swing , 2007 .

[54]  Denis Mollison,et al.  The Wave Energy Resource , 2008 .

[55]  Chiang C. Mei,et al.  NUMERICAL METHODS IN WATER-WAVE DIFFRACTION AND RADIATION , 1978 .

[56]  A. Clément,et al.  Study of the Smoothing effect on the power production in an array of SEAREV wave energy converters. , 2008 .

[57]  Kesayoshi Hadano,et al.  Dynamics of the Float-Counterweight Type Wave Power Generation System , 2010 .

[58]  A. Babarit Impact of long separating distances on the energy production of two interacting wave energy converters , 2010 .

[59]  K. R. Drake,et al.  On the hydrodynamics of bobbing cones , 2009 .

[60]  Katsuji Tanizawa,et al.  A study on parametric roll motions by fully nonlinear numerical wave tank , 1998 .

[61]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  Assessment of the influence of the distance between two wave energy converters on energy production , 2010 .

[62]  P. McIver Some hydrodynamic aspects of arrays of wave-energy devices , 1994 .

[63]  António F.O. Falcão,et al.  Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies , 2010 .

[64]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Hybrid frequency-time domain models for dynamic response analysis of marine structures , 2008 .

[65]  Šime Malenica,et al.  Experimental and theoretical analysis of the wave decay along a long array of vertical cylinders , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[66]  Peter Stansby Methods and device for utilising wave energy. UK Patent Application , 2003 .

[67]  Vengatesan Venugopal,et al.  Interaction of waves with an array of floating wave energy devcies , 2007 .

[68]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[69]  Kjell Budal,et al.  Wave power conversion by point absorbers - A Norwegian project , 1982 .

[70]  Armin W. Troesch,et al.  Hydrodynamic Heave Damping Estimation and Scaling for Tension Leg Platforms , 1994 .

[71]  J. R. Morison,et al.  The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles , 1950 .

[72]  Julien De Rouck,et al.  Performance of closely spaced point absorbers with constrained floater motion , 2009 .