Passive Sensor Data for Characterizing States of Increased Risk for Eating Disorder Behaviors in the Digital Phenotyping Arm of the Binge Eating Genetics Initiative: Protocol for an Observational Study

Background Data that can be easily, efficiently, and safely collected via cell phones and other digital devices have great potential for clinical application. Here, we focus on how these data could be used to refine and augment intervention strategies for binge eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN), conditions that lack highly efficacious, enduring, and accessible treatments. These data are easy to collect digitally but are highly complex and present unique methodological challenges that invite innovative solutions. Objective We describe the digital phenotyping component of the Binge Eating Genetics Initiative, which uses personal digital device data to capture dynamic patterns of risk for binge and purge episodes. Characteristic data signatures will ultimately be used to develop personalized models of eating disorder pathologies and just-in-time interventions to reduce risk for related behaviors. Here, we focus on the methods used to prepare the data for analysis and discuss how these approaches can be generalized beyond the current application. Methods The University of North Carolina Biomedical Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures. Participants who met diagnostic criteria for BED or BN provided real time assessments of eating behaviors and feelings through the Recovery Record app delivered on iPhones and the Apple Watches. Continuous passive measures of physiological activation (heart rate) and physical activity (step count) were collected from Apple Watches over 30 days. Data were cleaned to account for user and device recording errors, including duplicate entries and unreliable heart rate and step values. Across participants, the proportion of data points removed during cleaning ranged from <0.1% to 2.4%, depending on the data source. To prepare the data for multivariate time series analysis, we used a novel data handling approach to address variable measurement frequency across data sources and devices. This involved mapping heart rate, step count, feeling ratings, and eating disorder behaviors onto simultaneous minute-level time series that will enable the characterization of individual- and group-level regulatory dynamics preceding and following binge and purge episodes. Results Data collection and cleaning are complete. Between August 2017 and May 2021, 1019 participants provided an average of 25 days of data yielding 3,419,937 heart rate values, 1,635,993 step counts, 8274 binge or purge events, and 85,200 feeling observations. Analysis will begin in spring 2022. Conclusions We provide a detailed description of the methods used to collect, clean, and prepare personal digital device data from one component of a large, longitudinal eating disorder study. The results will identify digital signatures of increased risk for binge and purge events, which may ultimately be used to create digital interventions for BED and BN. Our goal is to contribute to increased transparency in the handling and analysis of personal digital device data. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04162574; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04162574 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/38294

[1]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  Opportunities and challenges in the collection and analysis of digital phenotyping data , 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[2]  Brian R. Baucom,et al.  The Binge Eating Genetics Initiative (BEGIN): study protocol , 2020, BMC Psychiatry.

[3]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Digital Biomarkers of Social Anxiety Severity: Digital Phenotyping Using Passive Smartphone Sensors , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  J. Linardon Rates of abstinence following psychological or behavioral treatments for binge‐eating disorder: Meta‐analysis , 2018, The International journal of eating disorders.

[5]  John Torous,et al.  Smartphones, Sensors, and Machine Learning to Advance Real-Time Prediction and Interventions for Suicide Prevention: a Review of Current Progress and Next Steps , 2018, Current Psychiatry Reports.

[6]  Patrick C. Staples,et al.  Relapse prediction in schizophrenia through digital phenotyping: a pilot study , 2018, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[7]  K. Lohr,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Binge‐Eating Disorder: Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis , 2017, European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association.

[8]  D. Mohr,et al.  Personal Sensing: Understanding Mental Health Using Ubiquitous Sensors and Machine Learning. , 2017, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[9]  John Torous,et al.  New Tools for New Research in Psychiatry: A Scalable and Customizable Platform to Empower Data Driven Smartphone Research , 2016, JMIR mental health.

[10]  Andrew T. Campbell,et al.  Mobile Behavioral Sensing for Outpatients and Inpatients With Schizophrenia. , 2016, Psychiatric services.

[11]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Mobile Phone Sensor Correlates of Depressive Symptom Severity in Daily-Life Behavior: An Exploratory Study , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  M. Keshavan,et al.  Patient Smartphone Ownership and Interest in Mobile Apps to Monitor Symptoms of Mental Health Conditions: A Survey in Four Geographically Distinct Psychiatric Clinics , 2014, JMIR mental health.

[13]  S. Crow,et al.  Examining duration of binge eating episodes in binge eating disorder. , 2013, The International journal of eating disorders.

[14]  H. Hoek,et al.  Epidemiology, course, and outcome of eating disorders , 2013, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[15]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  A stage-based model of personal informatics systems , 2010, CHI.

[16]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Using Mobile & Personal Sensing Technologies to Support Health Behavior Change in Everyday Life: Lessons Learned , 2009, AMIA.

[17]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[18]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[19]  T. L. Guertin,et al.  Eating behavior of bulimics, self-identified binge eaters, and non-eating-disordered individuals: what differentiates these populations? , 1999, Clinical psychology review.