Structural ensemble in computational drug screening
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Y. Fukunishi,et al. Classification of chemical compounds by protein-compound docking for use in designing a focused library. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[2] F. Javier Luque,et al. Ligand-induced changes in the binding sites of proteins , 2002, Bioinform..
[3] Allen B Reitz,et al. Linear interaction energy models for beta-secretase (BACE) inhibitors: Role of van der Waals, electrostatic, and continuum-solvation terms. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[4] Naoki Tanaka,et al. Small-World Phenomena in Chemical Library Networks: Application to Fragment-Based Drug Discovery , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[5] B. Roux,et al. Absolute binding free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials. , 2006, Biophysical journal.
[6] R Abagyan,et al. Abagyan R., Totrov M., Kuznetsov D. ICM-A new Method for protein Modeling and Design.Applications to Docking and structure Prediction from the Distorded native Conformation. 1994 J. Comp. Chem. 15, 488-506 , 2007 .
[7] Jaime Rubio-Martinez,et al. Comparative Evaluation of MMPBSA and XSCORE To Compute Binding Free Energy in XIAP-Peptide Complexes , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[8] Haruki Nakamura,et al. A Virtual Active Compound Produced from the Negative Image of a Ligand-binding Pocket, and its Application to in-silico Drug Screening , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[9] Haruki Nakamura,et al. An Efficient in Silico Screening Method Based on the Protein-Compound Affinity Matrix and Its Application to the Design of a Focused Library for Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Ligands , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[10] Y. Fukunishi,et al. Similarities among receptor pockets and among compounds: analysis and application to in silico ligand screening. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[11] C. Venkatachalam,et al. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[12] Y. Fukunishi,et al. The Filling Potential Method: A Method for Estimating the Free Energy Surface for Protein−Ligand Docking , 2003 .
[13] Francesco Luigi Gervasio,et al. From A to B in free energy space. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.
[14] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculation by the Smooth Reaction Path Generation (SRPG) Method , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[15] Y. Martin,et al. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[16] C. E. Peishoff,et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[17] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[18] Jens Carlsson,et al. Improving the Accuracy of the Linear Interaction Energy Method for Solvation Free Energies. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[19] Peter Kolb,et al. Docking screens: right for the right reasons? , 2009, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[20] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[21] M. Gilson,et al. Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[22] J. Irwin,et al. Docking and chemoinformatic screens for new ligands and targets. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[23] Z. Deng,et al. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[24] I. Tinoco,et al. Equilibrium Information from Nonequilibrium Measurements in an Experimental Test of Jarzynski's Equality , 2002, Science.
[25] Shuichi Hirono,et al. Comparison of Consensus Scoring Strategies for Evaluating Computational Models of Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[26] B. Shoichet,et al. Molecular docking and ligand specificity in fragment-based inhibitor discovery. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.
[27] D. Frank Hsu,et al. Consensus Scoring Criteria for Improving Enrichment in Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[28] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Multiple target screening method for robust and accurate in silico ligand screening. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[29] D. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing , 1990, Proteins.
[30] Reiji Teramoto,et al. Consensus Scoring with Feature Selection for Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[31] Yoshifumi Fukunishi,et al. Structure-based drug screening and ligand-based drug screening with machine learning. , 2009, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[32] Maria I. Zavodszky,et al. Scoring confidence index: statistical evaluation of ligand binding mode predictions , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[33] B. Roux,et al. Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[34] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Prediction of protein-ligand complex structure by docking software guided by other complex structures. , 2008, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[35] Shaomeng Wang,et al. How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[36] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Noise Reduction Method for Molecular Interaction Energy: Application to in Silico Drug Screening and in Silico Target Protein Screening , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[37] Haruki Nakamura,et al. In Silico Fragment Screening by Replica Generation (FSRG) Method for Fragment-Based Drug Design , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[38] G. Vigers,et al. Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[39] P. Kollman,et al. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.
[40] Renxiao Wang,et al. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[41] Haruki Nakamura,et al. A method to enhance the hit ratio by a combination of structure-based drug screening and ligand-based screening , 2008, Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC.
[42] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[43] Ruben Abagyan,et al. ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..
[44] Reiji Teramoto,et al. Supervised Consensus Scoring for Docking and Virtual Screening , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[45] K. Schulten,et al. Free energy calculation from steered molecular dynamics simulations using Jarzynski's equality , 2003 .
[46] Thomas Lengauer,et al. Structure Based Drug Design , 2005 .
[47] B. Shoichet,et al. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[48] M. Murcko,et al. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[49] D. E. Clark,et al. Flexible docking using tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity , 1998, Proteins.
[50] Y. Fukunishi,et al. Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy using smooth reaction path generation (SRPG) method: a comparison of the explicit water model, gb/sa model and docking score function. , 2009, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.
[51] D. Pérahia,et al. Normal mode analysis as a prerequisite for drug design: Application to matrix metalloproteinases inhibitors , 2006, FEBS letters.
[52] A. Laio,et al. Flexible docking in solution using metadynamics. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[53] M. Gilson,et al. Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[54] Y. Fukunishi,et al. Finding ligands for G protein-coupled receptors based on the protein-compound affinity matrix. , 2007, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling.
[55] Jiro Shimada,et al. Hidden Active Information in a Random Compound Library: Extraction Using a Pseudo-Structure-Activity Relationship Model , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[56] Johan Åqvist,et al. Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[57] R. Clark,et al. Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[58] Anthony E. Klon,et al. Combination of a naive Bayes classifier with consensus scoring improves enrichment of high-throughput docking results. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[59] B. Roux,et al. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[60] Song Liu,et al. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[61] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Flexible docking of a ligand peptide to a receptor protein by multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation , 1997 .
[62] Takatsugu Hirokawa,et al. [Receptor-ligand docking simulation for membrane proteins]. , 2007, Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan.
[63] Hans Briem,et al. Flexsim-X: A Method for the Detection of Molecules with Similar Biological Activity , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[64] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Protein‐inhibitor flexible docking by a multicanonical sampling: Native complex structure with the lowest free energy and a free‐energy barrier distinguishing the native complex from the others , 2007, Proteins.