Beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass.

BACKGROUND Graft patency and clinical freedom from graft failure remains a subject of investigation in beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. METHODS A total of 214 patients underwent successful beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass from July 2004 to June 2007. Single-, double-, and triple-vessel beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass was performed in 139, 68, and 7 patients, respectively. Fifty patients underwent planned hybrid revascularization. Eighty percent of patients (172 of 214) underwent computed tomography angiography or conventional angiography within 3 months from the time of surgery. On computed tomography angiography, the analysis included gross patency, stenosis within the graft, and contrast in the grafted coronary artery. A FitzGibbon score was used to analyze graft patency and anastomosis in patients undergoing conventional angiography. Clinical follow-up was done in all patients for any major adverse cardiac event in relation to the revascularized coronary arteries. RESULTS There was no myocardial infarction, operative mortality, or conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass. All patients who had computed tomography angiography were found to have grossly patent graft without stenosis and demonstrated opacification of the grafted coronary artery. Fifty-seven grafts were studied in 39 patients by conventional angiography postoperatively during hybrid revascularization. At the time of study, all grafts except one had FitzGibbon grade A anastomosis and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow. Three patients (1.4%) required reintervention at 2, 3, and 13 months after initial beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. CONCLUSIONS The clinical freedom from graft failure noted in 98.6% patients appears to be excellent. Further angiographic and clinical follow-up is required to determine the long-term results.

[1]  A. Berrebi,et al.  Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  J G Grandjean,et al.  Video-assisted minimally invasive coronary operations without cardiopulmonary bypass: a multicenter study. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  R Cichon,et al.  Wrist-enhanced instrumentation: moving toward totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  D A Cooley,et al.  Con: beating-heart surgery for coronary revascularization: is it the most important development since the introduction of the heart-lung machine? , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  A. Darzi,et al.  Multi-detector computed tomography in coronary artery bypass graft assessment: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  M. Mack,et al.  Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting: what do we really know? , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  V I Kolessov,et al.  Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. , 1967, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  R. Kelly,et al.  OPCAB vs CABG: who, what, when, where? , 2004, Chest.

[9]  Robert H. Jones,et al.  The year in cardiovascular surgery. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Mack,et al.  Advances in the treatment of coronary artery disease. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  S. Westaby,et al.  Less invasive coronary surgery: consensus from the Oxford meeting. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  D. Loulmet,et al.  Results of the prospective multicenter trial of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  R. Califf,et al.  Techniques and benefits of multiple internal mammary artery bypass at 20 years of follow-up. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  V. Falk,et al.  Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Evaluation of robotic coronary surgery with intraoperative graft angiography and postoperative multislice computed tomography. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  T. Keenan,et al.  Bypassing the pump: changing practices in coronary artery surgery. , 2005, Chest.

[17]  B. Hamman,et al.  Interrupted distal anastomosis: the interrupted "porcupine" technique. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  J. W. Bolton,et al.  Results of a Phase One study on robotically assisted myocardial revascularization on the beating heart. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  C. Kolbitsch,et al.  Technical challenges in totally endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  H. Thiele,et al.  Seven-year follow-up after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: experience with more than 1300 patients. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  Eugene H Blackstone,et al.  Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  Ralph J Damiano.  Robotics in cardiac surgery: the Emperor's new clothes. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  T. Walles,et al.  Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.