Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness

Contractile myocytes provide a test of the hypothesis that cells sense their mechanical as well as molecular microenvironment, altering expression, organization, and/or morphology accordingly. Here, myoblasts were cultured on collagen strips attached to glass or polymer gels of varied elasticity. Subsequent fusion into myotubes occurs independent of substrate flexibility. However, myosin/actin striations emerge later only on gels with stiffness typical of normal muscle (passive Young's modulus, E ∼12 kPa). On glass and much softer or stiffer gels, including gels emulating stiff dystrophic muscle, cells do not striate. In addition, myotubes grown on top of a compliant bottom layer of glass-attached myotubes (but not softer fibroblasts) will striate, whereas the bottom cells will only assemble stress fibers and vinculin-rich adhesions. Unlike sarcomere formation, adhesion strength increases monotonically versus substrate stiffness with strongest adhesion on glass. These findings have major implications for in vivo introduction of stem cells into diseased or damaged striated muscle of altered mechanical composition.

[1]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  V. Moy,et al.  Mechanical properties of L929 cells measured by atomic force microscopy: effects of anticytoskeletal drugs and membrane crosslinking. , 2006, Scanning.

[3]  J. Vermeesch,et al.  Skeletal muscle repair by adult human mesenchymal stem cells from synovial membrane , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films : correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion , 2004 .

[5]  G. Watson,et al.  Imaging and force-distance analysis of human fibroblasts in vitro by atomic force microscopy. , 1999, Cytometry.

[6]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  Filamin 2 (FLN2): A Muscle-specific Sarcoglycan Interacting Protein , 2000 .

[7]  B. Ozanne,et al.  New N-RAP-binding partners α-actinin, filamin and Krp1 detected by yeast two-hybrid screening: implications for myofibril assembly , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  J. Watchko,et al.  Effect of injecting primary myoblasts versus putative muscle-derived stem cells on mass and force generation in mdx mice. , 2002, Human gene therapy.

[9]  C. Grund,et al.  Differential response of myofibrillar and cytoskeletal proteins in cells treated with phorbol myristate acetate , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  C. Rotsch,et al.  Dimensional and mechanical dynamics of active and stable edges in motile fibroblasts investigated by using atomic force microscopy. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell implantation in a swine myocardial infarct model: engraftment and functional effects. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[13]  Y. Wang,et al.  Formation and alignment of Z lines in living chick myotubes microinjected with rhodamine-labeled alpha-actinin , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Susan S. Brown,et al.  Skeletal muscle LIM protein 1 (SLIM1/FHL1) induces alpha 5 beta 1-integrin-dependent myocyte elongation. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[15]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  J. Veerkamp,et al.  Differentiation markers of mouse C2C12 and rat L6 myogenic cell lines and the effect of the differentiation medium , 1999, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[17]  J. Huard,et al.  Muscle-derived stem cells: potential for muscle regeneration. , 2003, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[18]  R. Mecham,et al.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pulmonary vascular remodeling. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.

[19]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[20]  G. Kobinger,et al.  Correction of the dystrophic phenotype by in vivo targeting of muscle progenitor cells. , 2003, Human gene therapy.

[21]  M. Beckerle,et al.  Zyxin and cCRP: two interactive LIM domain proteins associated with the cytoskeleton , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  R. Horowits,et al.  Targeting and functional role of N-RAP, a nebulin-related LIM protein, during myofibril assembly in cultured chick cardiomyocytes. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[23]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  T. Rando,et al.  Integrin-mediated Muscle Cell Spreading , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Nathan Christopher Shaner,et al.  Myofibrillogenesis in skeletal muscle cells. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Influence of type I collagen surface density on fibroblast spreading, motility, and contractility. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[28]  G. Borschel,et al.  Contractile Skeletal Muscle Tissue-Engineered on an Acellular Scaffold , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  M. Shigekawa,et al.  Stretch-activated cation channels in skeletal muscle myotubes from sarcoglycan-deficient hamsters. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[30]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[31]  Indu Ramachandran,et al.  Skeletal muscle myosin cross-bridge cycling is necessary for myofibrillogenesis. , 2003, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[32]  R. Mahaffy,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[33]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[34]  Amy H. Herrera,et al.  N-RAP scaffolds I-Z-I assembly during myofibrillogenesis in cultured chick cardiomyocytes , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[35]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[36]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Measuring the Elastic Properties of Thin Polymer Films with the Atomic Force Microscope , 1998 .

[37]  Ferenc Horkay,et al.  Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[38]  V. Koteliansky,et al.  - Integrins, Cytoskeletal and Extracellular Matrix Proteins in Developing Smooth Muscle Cells of Human Aorta , 1995 .

[39]  J. Shrager,et al.  The mdx mouse diaphragm reproduces the degenerative changes of Duchenne muscular dystrophy , 1991, Nature.

[40]  D. Discher,et al.  Patterning, prestress, and peeling dynamics of myocytes. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[41]  Saidi A Mohiddin,et al.  Genomic organization, alternative splicing, and expression of human and mouse N-RAP, a nebulin-related LIM protein of striated muscle. , 2003, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[42]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[43]  C Rotsch,et al.  Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[44]  Xunsheng Chen,et al.  Lasp-1 binds to non-muscle F-actin in vitro and is localized within multiple sites of dynamic actin assembly in vivo , 2002, Journal of Cell Science.

[45]  E. Elson,et al.  Mechanical function of dystrophin in muscle cells , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  Y. Shimada,et al.  Myofibril assembly is linked with vinculin, alpha-actinin, and cell-substrate contacts in embryonic cardiac myocytes in vitro. , 1989, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[47]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[48]  William E Kraus,et al.  Apparent elastic modulus and hysteresis of skeletal muscle cells throughout differentiation. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[49]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Traction forces in locomoting cells. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[50]  J. Chamley-Campbell,et al.  Smooth muscle phenotypic modulation: role in atherogenesis. , 1981, Medical hypotheses.

[51]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Regulation of mechanical interactions between fibroblasts and the substratum by stretch-activated Ca2+ entry , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[52]  D. Frenkel,et al.  Phase behavior of two-dimensional hard rod fluids , 2000 .

[53]  Susan S. Brown,et al.  Skeletal muscle LIM protein 1 (SLIM1/FHL1) induces α5β1-integrin-dependent myocyte elongation , 2003 .

[54]  Nathan D. Gallant,et al.  Micropatterned surfaces to engineer focal adhesions for analysis of cell adhesion strengthening , 2002 .

[55]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  W. Kraus,et al.  Differentiation of mammalian skeletal muscle cells cultured on microcarrier beads in a rotating cell culture system , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.