Brightness contrast perception in the mesopic region

Subjective evaluations of brightness contrast were obtained for Munsell chips of varying hues, lightness values and sizes against a white background illuminated in turn by four white illuminants at four background luminances in the mesopic region. Chip lightness was the strongest variable, resulting in a family of monotonic functions relating brightness contrast ratings to chip lightness. At the lowest light levels a nearly linear relationship was found between chip lightness and subjective ratings. As light levels increased, the relationship became curvilinear such that at the lowest contrast, chromatic brightness became important for subjective ratings. Within the level of precision for this experiment, chip hue and size as well as the spectral power distribution of the illuminants did not significantly impact the overall brightness contrast ratings. The subjective ratings of brightness contrast were analysed as a function of the luminance contrast of the stimuli as determined by conventional photometry and by three models of mesopic vision. The response functions relating subjective rating to the stimulus characterized in terms of these models were similar to those obtained with conventional photometry.

[1]  G Wald,et al.  HUMAN VISION AND THE SPECTRUM. , 1945, Science.

[2]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The Road Not Taken , 1994, Journal of learning disabilities.

[3]  John D. Bullough,et al.  Evaluating light source efficacy under mesopic conditions using reaction times , 1997 .

[4]  John L Barbur,et al.  Effective contrast of colored stimuli in the mesopic range: a metric for perceived contrast based on achromatic luminance contrast. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  B. Boycott,et al.  Organization of the primate retina: electron microscopy , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[6]  John L. Barbur,et al.  Visual performance at mesopic light levels: an empirical model , 1999 .

[7]  Mitsuo Ikeda,et al.  Equivalent lightness of colored objects of equal munsell chroma and of equal munsell value at various illuminances , 1991 .

[8]  M. Pirenne,et al.  Accuracy and Sensitivity of the Human Eye , 1952, Nature.

[9]  Deane B. Judo A five-attribute system of describing visual appearance , 1961 .

[10]  D. Puro The Retina. An Approachable Part of the Brain , 1988 .

[11]  W. D. WRIGHT,et al.  “The Rays are Not Coloured” , 1963, Nature.

[12]  J. Freyssinier-Nova,et al.  A proposed unified system of photometry , 2004 .

[13]  D. A. Palmer,et al.  The definition of a standard observer for mesopic photometry. , 1967, Vision research.

[14]  Andrew V. Barber Visual Mechanisms and Predictors of Far Field Visual Task Performance , 1990 .

[15]  M. Ikeda,et al.  Mesopic luminous-efficiency functions. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  M. Ikeda,et al.  Equivalent lightness of colored objects at illuminances from the scotopic to the photopic level , 1989 .

[17]  John D. Bullough,et al.  Design and optimization of a retinal flux density meter , 2002 .

[18]  J. Kinney,et al.  Comparison of scotopic, mesopic, and photopic spectral sensitivity curves. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  M. Rea,et al.  A system of mesopic photometry , 1998 .

[20]  K. Sagawa,et al.  System of mesopic photometry for evaluating lights in terms of comparative brightness relationships , 1992 .

[21]  S. M. Berman,et al.  Energy Efficiency Consequences of Scotopic Sensitivity , 1992 .

[22]  J. Bowmaker,et al.  Visual pigments of rods and cones in a human retina. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  The Rays Are Not Coloured, Essays on the Science of Vision and Colour , 1969 .

[24]  L. L. Sloan INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNICS FOR THE CLINICAL TESTING OF LIGHT SENSE: IV. SIZE OF PUPIL AS A VARIABLE FACTOR IN THE DETERMINATION OF THE LIGHT MINIMUM , 1940 .

[25]  C. Cuttle,et al.  Lighting by Design , 2003 .

[26]  A V Barber Visual Mechanisms and Predictors of Far Field Visual Task Performance , 1990, Human factors.

[27]  R. Hunt Colour Science : Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulas , 1968 .

[28]  Paul G. Roofe,et al.  The Vertebrate Visual System , 1958, Neurology.

[29]  D. A. Palmer,et al.  A System of Mesopic Photometry , 1966, Nature.

[30]  K. Sagawa,et al.  Spectral luminous efficiency functions in the mesopic range. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[31]  Alan L. Lewis,et al.  Visual Performance as a Function of Spectral Power Distribution of Light Sources at Luminances Used for General Outdoor Lighting , 1999 .

[32]  D. A. Palmer Standard observer for large-field photometry at any level. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[33]  Richard G. Domey,et al.  Dark Adaptation as a Function of Age: I. A Statistical Analysis , 1960 .

[34]  A. L. Lewis Equating Light Sources for Visual Performance at Low Luminances , 1998 .