Microfluidic processor allows rapid HER2 immunohistochemistry of breast carcinomas and significantly reduces ambiguous (2+) read-outs

Biomarker analysis is playing an essential role in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction. Quantitative assessment of immunohistochemical biomarker expression on tumor tissues is of clinical relevance when deciding targeted treatments for cancer patients. Here, we report a microfluidic tissue processor that permits accurate quantification of the expression of biomarkers on tissue sections, enabled by the ultra-rapid and uniform fluidic exchange of the device. An important clinical biomarker for invasive breast cancer is human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [(HER2), also known as neu], a transmembrane tyrosine kinase that connotes adverse prognostic information for the patients concerned and serves as a target for personalized treatment using the humanized antibody trastuzumab. Unfortunately, when using state-of-the-art methods, the intensity of an immunohistochemical signal is not proportional to the extent of biomarker expression, causing ambiguous outcomes. Using our device, we performed tests on 76 invasive breast carcinoma cases expressing various levels of HER2. We eliminated more than 90% of the ambiguous results (n = 27), correctly assigning cases to the amplification status as assessed by in situ hybridization controls, whereas the concordance for HER2-negative (n = 31) and -positive (n = 18) cases was 100%. Our results demonstrate the clinical potential of microfluidics for accurate biomarker expression analysis. We anticipate our technique will be a diagnostic tool that will provide better and more reliable data, onto which future treatment regimes can be based.

[1]  H. Nygren,et al.  Immunochemistry at interfaces. , 1989, Immunology.

[2]  D E Leckband,et al.  A computational reaction-diffusion model for the analysis of transport-limited kinetics. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  Jinha M. Park,et al.  Diagnostic Evaluation of HER-2 as a Molecular Target: An Assessment of Accuracy and Reproducibility of Laboratory Testing in Large, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trials , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  H. Nygren,et al.  Kinetics of antibody binding to surface-immobilized antigen. Analysis of data and an empiric model. , 1994, Biophysical chemistry.

[5]  M. Owens,et al.  HER2 amplification ratios by fluorescence in situ hybridization and correlation with immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 6556 breast cancer tissues. , 2004, Clinical breast cancer.

[6]  A. Daponte,et al.  Comparative evaluation of non-informative HER-2 immunoreactions (2+) in breast carcinomas with FISH, CISH and QRT-PCR. , 2007, Breast.

[7]  Johannes Gerdes,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki‐67 antigen (MIB 1 and MIB 3) detect proliferating cells in microwave‐processed formalin‐fixed paraffin sections , 1992, The Journal of pathology.

[8]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  G. Bussolati,et al.  Technical pitfalls potentially affecting diagnoses in immunohistochemistry , 2008, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[10]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.

[11]  E. Wall,et al.  Current technologies for HER2 testing in breast cancer. , 2011, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[12]  Qinjian Zhao,et al.  Complexities in horseradish peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of dihydroxyphenoxazine derivatives: appropriate ranges for pH values and hydrogen peroxide concentrations in quantitative analysis. , 2004, Analytical biochemistry.

[13]  H. Nygren,et al.  Kinetics of antigen-antibody reactions at solid-liquid interfaces. , 1988, Journal of immunological methods.

[14]  Sun-Young Kong,et al.  Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using a Microfluidic Multiplexed Immunohistochemistry Platform , 2010, PloS one.

[15]  A. Sadana,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Antigen‐Antibody Binding Kinetics: Biosensor Applications , 1994, Biotechnology progress.

[16]  Martin A M Gijs,et al.  On-chip immunoassay using electrostatic assembly of streptavidin-coated bead micropatterns. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  Igor Goychuk,et al.  Kinetics of antigen binding to antibody microspots: Strong limitation by mass transport to the surface , 2006, Proteomics.

[18]  Minseok S. Kim,et al.  Quantitative proteomic profiling of breast cancers using a multiplexed microfluidic platform for immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[19]  H. Nygren Real-time recording of antigen-antibody reactions at surfaces: interpretation of data and a statistical model , 1995 .

[20]  M. Gijs,et al.  Bioconjugated lanthanide luminescent helicates as multilabels for lab-on-a-chip detection of cancer biomarkers. , 2010, The Analyst.

[21]  Dylan Reilly,et al.  Standardization of HER2 immunohistochemistry in breast cancer by automated quantitative analysis. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[22]  H. Yaziji,et al.  Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: What can Go Wrong? , 2006, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[23]  Lyndsay N Harris,et al.  Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Revisiting the technical validation of tumour biomarker assays: how to open a Pandora's box , 2011, BMC medicine.

[25]  David Juncker,et al.  Formation of gradients of proteins on surfaces with microfluidic networks , 2000 .

[26]  G. J. Colurso,et al.  Interferometric analysis of intrasection and intersection thickness variability associated with cryostat microtomy , 2005, The Histochemical Journal.

[27]  Patrick Hunziker,et al.  Modeling and Optimization of High-Sensitivity, Low-Volume Microfluidic-Based Surface Immunoassays , 2005, Biomedical microdevices.

[28]  S. Theander,et al.  A diffusion limited reaction theory for a microtiter plate assay. , 1988, Journal of immunological methods.

[29]  Igor Goychuk,et al.  Antibody microarrays: the crucial impact of mass transport on assay kinetics and sensitivity , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[30]  M. Brandon,et al.  Site-directed differences in the immune response to the fetus. , 1989, Immunology.

[31]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  D. Dutta,et al.  Kinetic ELISA in Microfluidic Channels , 2011, Biosensors.

[33]  Martin A. M. Gijs,et al.  FAST IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL BIOMARKER DETECTION DEVICE FOR CANCER TISSUE SLICES , 2010 .

[34]  H. Nygren,et al.  Kinetics of antibody binding to solid-phase-immobilised antigen. Effect of diffusion rate limitation and steric interaction. , 1987, Journal of immunological methods.

[35]  D. Slamon,et al.  Assessment of methods for tissue-based detection of the HER-2/neu alteration in human breast cancer: a direct comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  I. Ellis,et al.  Breast carcinomas with borderline (2+) HER2 immunohistochemistry: percentage of cells with complete membrane staining for HER2 and the frequency of HER2 amplification , 2011, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[37]  Martin A M Gijs,et al.  Parylene to silicon nitride bonding for post-integration of high pressure microfluidics to CMOS devices. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[38]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Comparative long-term prognostic value of quantitative HER-2/neu protein expression, DNA ploidy, and morphometric and clinical features in paraffin-embedded invasive breast cancer. , 1991, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.