How much commutativity is needed to prove polynomial identities?

Let f be a non-commutative polynomial such that f = 0 if we assume that the variables in f commute. Let Q(f) be the smallest k such that there exist polynomials g1, g ′ 1, g2, g ′ 2, . . . , gk, g ′ k with f ∈ I([g1, g 1], [g2, g 2], . . . , [gk, g k]) , where [g, h] = gh − hg. Then Q(f) ≤ ` n 2 , where n is the number of variables of f . We show that there exists a polynomial f with Q(f) = Ω(n). We pose the problem of constructing such an f explicitly, pointing out that the solution may have applications to complexity of proofs.

[1]  A. Yehudayoff,et al.  Arithmetic complexity in algebraic extensions , 2009 .

[2]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Non-commutative circuits and the sum-of-squares problem , 2010, Symposium on the Theory of Computing.

[3]  Walter Baur,et al.  The Complexity of Partial Derivatives , 1983, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Stephen A. Cook,et al.  The Relative Efficiency of Propositional Proof Systems , 1979, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[5]  Jan Krajícek,et al.  Bounded arithmetic, propositional logic, and complexity theory , 1995, Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications.

[6]  Iddo Tzameret,et al.  The Proof Complexity of Polynomial Identities , 2009, 2009 24th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[7]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Lower bounds for non-commutative computation , 1991, STOC '91.