Estimating Seismic Demands for Performance-Based Engineering of Buildings

Author(s): Reyes, Juan Carlos | Advisor(s): Chopra, Anil K | Abstract: Earthquake engineering practice is increasingly using performance-based procedures for evaluating existing buildings and proposed designs of new buildings. Both nonlinear static and nonlinear response history analyses (RHA) are used for estimating engineering demand parameters (EDPs)--floor displacements, story drifts, internal forces, hinge rotation, etc--in performance-based engineering of buildings. Topics related to both analysis procedures are investigated in this dissertation.In the first part, the original modal pushover analysis (MPA) to estimate seismic demands due to one component of ground motion is extended to consider two horizontal components simultaneously in three-dimensional analysis of buildings, and to estimate internal forces and plastic hinge rotations directly from pushover analyses. Subsequently, the accuracy of MPA in estimating EDPs for tall buildings and unsymmetric-plan buildings is evaluated. Seismic demands for recently designed and built 48- and 62-story buildings with ductile concrete core walls--designed according to the alternative provisions of the 2001 San Francisco Building Code (SFBC)--due to an ensemble of 30 ground motions are computed by MPA and nonlinear RHA, and compared. We demonstrate that MPA procedure shows degree of accuracy that is sufficient for practical application in estimating median values of EDPs for tall buildings subjected to two horizontal components of ground motion. The accuracy of the extended MPA procedure is also evaluated for low- and medium-rise unsymmetric-plan buildings with ductile frames designed in accordance with the 1985 Uniform Building Code (UBC85) and the 2006 International Building Code (IBC06). Seismic demands are computed for six unsymmetric-plan buildings due to 39 ground motions acting simultaneously in two orthogonal horizontal directions. Comparing these results with those from nonlinear RHA, we demonstrate that MPA provides good estimates of EDPs whereas the procedures specified in the ASCE/SEI 41-06 standard and the Eurocode 8 are not satisfactory for estimating seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings.The second part of the dissertation concerns nonlinear response history analysis of buildings. With the goal of developing effective procedures for selection and scaling of multi-component ground motions to be used in nonlinear RHA, a modal-pushover-based-scaling (MPS) procedure is developed in this investigation. The developed MPS procedure is an extension of the original MPS procedure for one component of ground motion to two horizontal components. In this investigation, each horizontal component of ground motion is scaled by a factor selected to match the deformation of its first-"mode" inelastic SDF system to a target inelastic deformation that may be estimated using a design (or response) spectrum. The properties of the first-"mode" inelastic SDF system are determined by pushover analysis of the building using the first-mode distribution. Based on the results for medium-rise symmetric-plan and unsymmetric-plan buildings with ductile frames, we demonstrate that the MPS procedure provides much superior results than the scaling procedure specified in the ASCE/SEI 7-05 standard.

[1]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Modal combination rules for multicomponent earthquake excitation , 1985 .

[2]  Kenneth T. Farrow,et al.  Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics , 2003 .

[3]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA Ground-Motion Relations , 2008 .

[4]  David J. Goodman,et al.  Personal Communications , 1994, Mobile Communications.

[5]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures , 2003 .

[6]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .

[7]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  SIMPLE PUSH‐OVER ANALYSIS OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDINGS , 1997 .

[8]  H. Krawinkler,et al.  Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities , 1992 .

[9]  Colorado Colorado,et al.  AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS , 2010 .

[10]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Seismic Performance and Retrofit Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1997 .

[11]  P. Malhotra Strong-Motion Records for Site-Specific Analysis , 2003 .

[12]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of the MPA Procedure for Estimating Seismic Demands: RC-SMRF Buildings , 2008 .

[13]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[14]  Gang Wang,et al.  Design Ground Motion Library (DGML) – Tool for Selecting Time History Records for Specific Engineering Applications (Abstract) , 2007 .

[15]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Structural performance assessment under near‐source pulse‐like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures , 2008 .

[16]  K. Campbell,et al.  NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s , 2008 .

[17]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Extension of Modal Pushover Analysis to Compute Member Forces , 2005 .

[18]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Modal-Pushover-Based Ground-Motion Scaling Procedure , 2011 .

[19]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations , 2019, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes.

[20]  R. P. Kennedy,et al.  Engineering characterization of ground motion. Task I. Effects of characteristics of free-field motion on structural response , 1984 .

[21]  A. Kiureghian A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of mdf systems , 1981 .

[22]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Earthquakes, Records, and Nonlinear Responses , 1998 .

[23]  B. Taranath Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2004 .

[24]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER , 2009 .

[25]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Scaling Methods for Earthquake Response Spectra , 1984 .

[26]  JONATHAN HANCOCK,et al.  AN IMPROVED METHOD OF MATCHING RESPONSE SPECTRA OF RECORDED EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION USING WAVELETS , 2006 .

[27]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[28]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of Modal and FEMA Pushover Analyses: SAC Buildings , 2004 .

[29]  A. Veletsos,et al.  Effect of Inelastic Behavior on the Response of Simple Systems to Earthquake Motions , 1975 .

[30]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Statistics of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Estimate of Displacement for Pushover Analysis of Buildings , 2003 .

[31]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions , 2007 .

[32]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[33]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications , 2001 .

[34]  W. J. Hall CHAPTER 24 VIBRATION OF STRUCTURES INDUCED BY GROUND MOTION , 2001 .

[35]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Adaptive Spectra-Based Pushover Procedure for Seismic Evaluation of Structures , 2000 .

[36]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  CONSIDERATION OF NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTION EFFECTS IN SEISMIC DESIGN , 2000 .

[37]  Simon Kim,et al.  Push-over Analysis Procedure in Earthquake Engineering , 1999 .

[38]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement , 1994 .

[39]  A. Chopra,et al.  Inelastic Deformation Ratios for Design and Evaluation of Structures: Single-Degree-of- Freedom Bilinear Systems , 2004 .

[40]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames , 2003 .

[41]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Selection and Scaling of Ground Motion Time Histories for Structural Design Using Genetic Algorithms , 2004 .

[42]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  THE USE OF REAL EARTHQUAKE ACCELEROGRAMS AS INPUT TO DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[43]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis , 1998 .

[44]  H Krawinkler,et al.  Shear in Beam-Column Joints in Seismic Design of Steel Frames , 1978, Engineering Journal.

[45]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s , 2008 .

[46]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra , 1999 .

[47]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings , 2002 .

[48]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings , 2006 .

[49]  S. Kunnath,et al.  METHOD OF MODAL COMBINATIONS FOR PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[50]  Won-jun Chung,et al.  Implicit pseudodynamic algorithm with an event-to-event solution scheme , 2007 .

[51]  Babak Alavi,et al.  Behavior of moment‐resisting frame structures subjected to near‐fault ground motions , 2004 .

[52]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings , 2009 .

[53]  J. Baker,et al.  Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection , 2006 .

[54]  D. Giraldo,et al.  Modal Identification through Ambient Vibration: Comparative Study , 2009 .

[55]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  PROS AND CONS OF A PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1998 .

[56]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric‐plan buildings , 2004 .

[57]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures , 1999 .

[58]  David M. Boore,et al.  Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1981 .

[59]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Selection and Scaling of Real Accelerograms for Bi-Directional Loading: A Review of Current Practice and Code Provisions , 2007 .

[60]  C. Menun,et al.  A Replacement for the 30%, 40%, and SRSS Rules for Multicomponent Seismic Analysis , 1998 .

[61]  E. Rosenblueth,et al.  Approximate Design for Multicomponent Earthquakes , 1977 .

[62]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  AMPLIFICATION FACTORS TO ESTIMATE INELASTIC DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS FOR THE DESIGN OF STRUCTURES IN THE NEAR FIELD , 2000 .

[63]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF VERTICALLY IRREGULAR FRAMES: RESPONSE HISTORY AND MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSES , 2004 .

[64]  Sang Whan Han,et al.  Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure , 2006 .

[65]  M. Nuray Aydinoğlu An Incremental Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure Based on Inelastic Spectral Displacements for Multi-Mode Seismic Performance Evaluation , 2003 .

[66]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands , 2004 .

[67]  R. Goel,et al.  Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods Based on Inelastic Design Spectrum , 1999 .

[68]  P. Fajfar ENGINEERING – A BREAKTHROUGH OF SIMPLIFIED NON-LINEAR METHODS , 2002 .

[69]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Earthquake spectra and design , 1982 .

[70]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers , 1970 .

[71]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[72]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  The tall buildings initiative for alternative seismic design , 2007 .

[73]  R. Goel,et al.  Evaluation of NSP to Estimate Seismic Deformation: SDF Systems , 2000 .