Stakeholder Engagement to Guide Decision‐Relevant Water Data Delivery

Water resources management and policy making require access to reliable scientific data. However, water managers may need to overcome various obstacles to accessing data. For example, insufficient technological infrastructures, low data literacy, and data format complexities often inhibit data user access. Thus, it is imperative to include stakeholders in the design of data delivery systems. The United States Geological Survey's Water Resources Mission Area is currently developing Integrated Water Availability Assessments (IWAAs) — multi‐extent, stakeholder driven, near real‐time water availability census and prediction for human and ecological uses. To provide appropriate user accessibility to data delivery systems developed for IWAAs, a user‐centered design process including stakeholder focus groups was used to determine potential water data user needs and preferences. Focus groups identified five types of potential users: Public sector water resources managers, Public sector water resources manager data analysts, Industry and private companies, Tribal Nations, and Nonprofit organizations. Different water data user types depended on diverse spatial and temporal scale data. Public sector water resources managers benefitted most from data synthesized into user‐friendly platforms and Public sector water resources data analysts preferred easy access to raw data. These findings can support the development of a water data delivery platform that meets a variety of user needs.

[1]  S. Hubbard,et al.  Making a Water Data System Responsive to Information Needs of Decision Makers , 2021, Frontiers in Climate.

[2]  M. Nelson,et al.  Considering the Case for Diversity in Natural Resources , 2020, BioScience.

[3]  Sharon L. Qi,et al.  Prioritizing river basins for intensive monitoring and assessment by the US Geological Survey , 2020, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[4]  P. Lambert,et al.  Water priorities for the Nation—U.S. Geological Survey Integrated Water Availability Assessments , 2020 .

[5]  M. Cox The Added Value , 2020 .

[6]  Allan Kelly Customers, Users, and Stakeholders , 2019, The Art of Agile Product Ownership.

[7]  Anja du Plessis Current and Future Water Scarcity and Stress , 2019 .

[8]  J. Lavery Building an evidence base for stakeholder engagement , 2018, Science.

[9]  R. Bales,et al.  Data for Water Decision Making: Informing the Implementation of California's Open and Transparent Water Data Act through Research and Engagement , 2018 .

[10]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Building Digital Government Strategies , 2017 .

[11]  Francisco A. R. Barbosa,et al.  Water availability, water quality water governance: the future ahead , 2015 .

[12]  Portland Press Ltd,et al.  Stakeholder Engagement for Inclusive Water Governance , 2015 .

[13]  John Bromley,et al.  Supporting decision making under uncertainty: Development of a participatory integrated model for water management in the middle Guadiana river basin , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Sadahiro Yamamoto,et al.  Global, regional, and country level need for data on wastewater generation, treatment, and use , 2013 .

[15]  B. J. Cisneros Water management: The data gap , 2013, Nature.

[16]  C. Ulrich,et al.  The added value of participatory modelling in fisheries management – what has been learnt? , 2012 .

[17]  L. Ping,et al.  Online discussion boards for focus group interviews: an exploratory study , 2009 .

[18]  吕一旭 Yixu Lu 引言 (Introduction) , 2009, Provincial China.

[19]  Lyn Turney,et al.  Virtual Focus Groups: New Frontiers in Research , 2005 .

[20]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Business Ethics: Corporate Responses to Scandal , 2004 .

[21]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[22]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  A survey of user-centered design practice , 2002, CHI.

[23]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  Developing and implementing decision support systems: a critique and a challenge , 1995 .

[24]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[25]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[26]  H. Eyre Introduction I , 1979, New Surveys in the Classics.