The role of monitoring and shirking in information systems project management

[1]  Vittal S. Anantatmula,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Project Manager Performance Model , 2008 .

[2]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Project management information systems: An empirical study of their impact on project managers and project success , 2008 .

[3]  Mark N. Frolick,et al.  It Project Risk Factors: The Project Management Professionals Perspective , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Effort, Performance, and Conscientiousness: An Agency Theory Perspective , 2007 .

[5]  David Maxfield,et al.  How Project Leaders Can Overcome the Crisis of Silence , 2007 .

[6]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[7]  Jerry Cha-Jan Chang,et al.  Identifying issues in customer relationship management at Merck-Medco , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Collaborative Project Management Approach and a Framework for its Supporting Systems , 2006 .

[9]  A. Lederer,et al.  The Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Rewards for Developers on Information Systems Project Success , 2006 .

[10]  R. Walker,et al.  Reporting on Software Development Projects to Senior Managers and the Board , 2006 .

[11]  Kam Jugdev,et al.  A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[12]  Kenneth E. Nidiffer,et al.  Evolving distributed project management , 2005, IEEE Software.

[13]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Information systems project management: an agency theory interpretation , 2003, J. Syst. Softw..

[15]  Marc N. Haines,et al.  Implementation Partner Involvement and Knowledge Transfer in the Context of ERP Implementations , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Paul Crawford,et al.  Project monitoring and evaluation: a method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation , 2003 .

[17]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  Reporting bad news about software projects: impact of organizational climate and information asymmetry in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[18]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion? , 2003 .

[19]  Saad H.S. Al-Jibouri,et al.  Monitoring systems and their effectiveness for project cost control in construction , 2003 .

[20]  Mark Keil,et al.  The reluctance to report bad news on troubled software projects: a theoretical model , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Benson Wier,et al.  Integrating Ethical Dimensions into a Model of Budgetary Slack Creation , 2000 .

[23]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[24]  Margaret A. Nemeth,et al.  Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysis , 1998, Technometrics.

[25]  David Baccarini,et al.  The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success , 1999 .

[26]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The norm of self-interest. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[27]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  Evolving a new theory of project success , 1999, Commun. ACM.

[28]  Robert W. Rutledge,et al.  The influence of self-interest and ethical considerations on managers evaluation judgments 1 The da , 1999 .

[29]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage , 1999 .

[30]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  A study of escalating commitment in principal–agent relationships: Effects of monitoring and personal responsibility. , 1998 .

[31]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[32]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS OF BOARD COMPOSITION, LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE, AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[33]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Disaggregating The Agency Contract: The Effects Of Monitoring, Incentive Alignment, And Term In Office On Agent Decision Making , 1997 .

[34]  N. Kowtha.  Skills, Incentives, and Control , 1997 .

[35]  A. K. Munns,et al.  The role of project management in achieving project success , 1996 .

[36]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  Compensation Contracts: Do Agency Theory Assumptions Predict Negotiated Agreements? , 1995 .

[37]  Paul Harrison,et al.  An incentive to shirk, privately held information, and managers' project evaluation decisions , 1994 .

[38]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[39]  M. Glynn,et al.  The Adult Playfulness Scale: An Initial Assessment , 1992 .

[40]  M. Bergen,et al.  Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories , 1992 .

[41]  Saeed Samiee,et al.  The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance , 1992 .

[42]  R. Kolbe,et al.  Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity , 1991 .

[43]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  Effects of Monitoring and Tradition on Compensation Arrangements: An Experiment with Principal-Agent Dyads , 1990 .

[44]  Joyce E. Berg.  The value of communication in agency contracts : theory and experimental evidence , 1990 .

[45]  Stanley Baiman,et al.  AGENCY RESEARCH IN MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING: A SECOND LOOK. , 1990 .

[46]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[47]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[48]  Barry L. Lewis,et al.  AN EXPERIMENT TESTING THE BEHAVIORAL EQUIVALENCE OF STRATEGICALLY EQUIVALENT EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS , 1989 .

[49]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[50]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[51]  Rita D. Kosnik.  Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance , 1987 .

[52]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[53]  M. W. Buckley.  The Structure of Business , 1986 .

[54]  M. Aldenderfer,et al.  Cluster Analysis. Sage University Paper Series On Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-044 , 1984 .

[55]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[56]  C. Schriesheim.  The Similarity of Individual Directed and Group Directed Leader Behavior Descriptions , 1979 .

[57]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[58]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[59]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[60]  H. Harman.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .