Buparlisib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (BELLE-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation is a hallmark of endocrine therapy-resistant, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. This phase 3 study assessed the efficacy of the pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer, including an evaluation of the PI3K pathway activation status as a biomarker for clinical benefit. METHODS The BELLE-2 trial was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed, hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor (HER2)-negative inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose disease had progressed on or after aromatase inhibitor treatment and had received up to one previous line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were included. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using interactive voice response technology (block size of 6) on day 15 of cycle 1 to receive oral buparlisib (100 mg/day) or matching placebo, starting on day 15 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Patients were assigned randomisation numbers with a validated interactive response technology; these numbers were linked to different treatment groups which in turn were linked to treatment numbers. PI3K status in tumour tissue was determined via central laboratory during a 14-day run-in phase. Randomisation was stratified by PI3K pathway activation status (activated vs non-activated vs and unknown) and visceral disease status (present vs absent). Patients, investigators, local radiologists, study team, and anyone involved in the study were masked to the identity of the treatment until unblinding. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival by local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 1.1) in the total population, in patients with known (activated or non-activated) PI3K pathway status, and in PI3K pathway-activated patients. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment according to the treatment they received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01610284, and is currently ongoing but not recruiting participants. FINDINGS Between Sept 7, 2012, and Sept 10, 2014, 1147 patients from 267 centres in 29 countries were randomly assigned to receive buparlisib (n=576) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n=571). In the total patient population (n=1147), median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 6·8-7·8) in the buparlisib group versus 5·0 months (4·0-5·2) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·67-0·89]; one-sided p=0·00021). In patients with known PI3K status (n=851), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 5·0-7·0) in the buparlisib group vs 4·5 months (3·3-5·0) in the placebo group (HR 0·80 [95% CI 0·68-0·94]; one-sided p=0·0033). In PI3K pathway-activated patients (n=372), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 4·9-7·1) in the buparlisib group versus 4·0 months (3·1-5·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·76 [0·60-0·97], one-sided p=0·014). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the buparlisib group versus the placebo group were increased alanine aminotransferase (146 [25%] of 573 patients vs six [1%] of 570), increased aspartate aminotransferase (103 [18%] vs 16 [3%]), hyperglycaemia (88 [15%] vs one [<1%]), and rash (45 [8%] vs none). Serious adverse events were reported in 134 (23%) of 573 patients in the buparlisib group compared with 90 [16%] of 570 patients in the placebo group; the most common serious adverse events (affecting ≥2% of patients) were increased alanine aminotransferase (17 [3%] of 573 vs one [<1%] of 570) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (14 [2%] vs one [<1%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION The results from this study show that PI3K inhibition combined with endocrine therapy is effective in postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Use of more selective PI3K inhibitors, such as α-specific PI3K inhibitor, is warranted to further improve safety and benefit in this setting. No further studies are being pursued because of the toxicity associated with this combination. FUNDING Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

[1]  M. Piccart,et al.  Double-blind, randomized placebo controlled trial of fulvestrant compared with exemestane after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: results from EFECT. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Choti,et al.  Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[3]  P. Lønning,et al.  Abstract S4-07: BELLE-3: A phase III study of buparlisib + fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2–, aromatase inhibitor-treated, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, who progressed on or after mTOR inhibitor-based treatment , 2017 .

[4]  A. Howell,et al.  Fulvestrant plus anastrozole or placebo versus exemestane alone after progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (SoFEA): a composite, multicentre, phase 3 randomised trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  W. Sellers,et al.  Identification and Characterization of NVP-BKM120, an Orally Available Pan-Class I PI3-Kinase Inhibitor , 2011, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[6]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[7]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[8]  S. Loi,et al.  Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  J. Bendell,et al.  Phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study of buparlisib (BKM120), an oral pan-Class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors , 2014, Investigational New Drugs.

[10]  M. Lichinitser,et al.  Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  G. Hampton,et al.  Heterogeneity and clinical significance of ESR1 mutations in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer patients receiving fulvestrant , 2016, Nature Communications.

[12]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Test and power considerations for multiple endpoint analyses using sequentially rejective graphical procedures , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  M. Ellis,et al.  Preclinical modeling of combined phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibition with endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer , 2011, Breast Cancer Research.

[14]  M. Berger,et al.  Capturing intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity by de novo mutation profiling of circulating cell-free tumor DNA: a proof-of-principle. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  Charles Swanton,et al.  Clinical management of breast cancer heterogeneity , 2015, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[16]  E. Winer,et al.  Abstract PD5-5: Phase I study of the PI3Kα inhibitor BYL719 plus fulvestrant in patients withPIK3CA-altered and wild type ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer , 2015 .

[17]  Michael G. Kharas,et al.  PI3K inhibition results in enhanced estrogen receptor function and dependence in hormone receptor–positive breast cancer , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[18]  Obi L. Griffith,et al.  A Phase I Trial of BKM120 (Buparlisib) in Combination with Fulvestrant in Postmenopausal Women with Estrogen Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  I. Ray-Coquard,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors: a GINECO study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Bert Vogelstein,et al.  DETECTION OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN EARLY AND LATE STAGE HUMAN MALIGNANCIES , 2014 .

[21]  G. Mills,et al.  Hyperactivation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase promotes escape from hormone dependence in estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer. , 2010, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  Angela Tam,et al.  AXL mediates resistance to PI3Kα inhibition by activating the EGFR/PKC/mTOR axis in head and neck and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. , 2015, Cancer cell.

[23]  G. Mills,et al.  ERα-dependent E2F transcription can mediate resistance to estrogen deprivation in human breast cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[24]  Obi L. Griffith,et al.  Convergent loss of PTEN leads to clinical resistance to a PI3Kα inhibitor , 2014, Nature.

[25]  J. Ware,et al.  First-in-Human Phase I Study of Pictilisib (GDC-0941), a Potent Pan–Class I Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase (PI3K) Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Clonal status of actionable driver events and the timing of mutational processes in cancer evolution , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[27]  Ben H. Park,et al.  Detection of Tumor PIK3CA Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer Using Peripheral Blood , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  W. Yung,et al.  Antitumor Activity of NVP-BKM120—A Selective Pan Class I PI3 Kinase Inhibitor Showed Differential Forms of Cell Death Based on p53 Status of Glioma Cells , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  E. Winer,et al.  Abstract PD5-2: Ph1b study of the PI3K inhibitor taselisib (GDC-0032) in combination with letrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer , 2015 .

[30]  Xin Huang,et al.  The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[31]  M. Piccart,et al.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  N. Rosen,et al.  mTORC1 Inhibition Is Required for Sensitivity to PI3K p110α Inhibitors in PIK3CA-Mutant Breast Cancer , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[33]  M. Piccart,et al.  ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)† , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  J. Berlin,et al.  451PDPHASE I STUDY OF THE PI3Kα INHIBITOR BYL719, AS A SINGLE AGENT IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS (AST). , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[35]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Graphical approaches for multiple comparison procedures using weighted Bonferroni, Simes, or parametric tests , 2011, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.