Subliminally Presented and Stored Objects Capture Spatial Attention

When objects disappear from view, we can still bring them to mind, at least for brief periods of time, because we can represent those objects in visual short-term memory (VSTM) (Sperling, 1960; Cowan, 2001). A defining characteristic of this representation is that it is topographic, that is, it preserves a spatial organization based on the original visual percept (Vogel and Machizawa, 2004; Astle et al., 2009; Kuo et al., 2009). Recent research has also shown that features or locations of visual items that match those being maintained in conscious VSTM automatically capture our attention (Awh and Jonides, 2001; Olivers et al., 2006; Soto et al., 2008). But do objects leave some trace that can guide spatial attention, even without participants intentionally remembering them? Furthermore, could subliminally presented objects leave a topographically arranged representation that can capture attention? We presented objects either supraliminally or subliminally and then 1 s later re-presented one of those objects in a new location, as a “probe” shape. As participants made an arbitrary perceptual judgment on the probe shape, their covert spatial attention was drawn to the original location of that shape, regardless of whether its initial presentation had been supraliminal or subliminal. We demonstrate this with neural and behavioral measures of memory-driven attentional capture. These findings reveal the existence of a topographically arranged store of “visual” objects, the content of which is beyond our explicit awareness but which nonetheless guides spatial attention.

[1]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[2]  Monica Fabiani,et al.  Multiple visual memory phenomena in a memory search task. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[3]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[5]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  E. Vogel,et al.  Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention to Features Precedes Attention to Locations in Visual Search: Evidence from Electromagnetic Brain Responses in Humans , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Jöran Lepsien,et al.  Searching for Targets within the Spatial Layout of Visual Short-Term Memory , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Martin Eimer,et al.  An electrophysiological measure of access to representations in visual working memory. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Roy Luria,et al.  Visual Short-term Memory Capacity for Simple and Complex Objects , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Roy Luria,et al.  Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  A. Nobre,et al.  Spatial Selection of Features within Perceived and Remembered Objects , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[15]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[16]  Katsuyuki Sakai,et al.  The prefrontal cortex and working memory: physiology and brain imaging , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Are There Multiple Visual Short-Term Memory Stores? , 2008, PloS one.

[19]  K Nakayama,et al.  Rapid, Object-Based Learning in the Deployment of Transient Attention , 2001, Perception.

[20]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  On the origin of event-related potentials indexing covert attentional selection during visual search. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Cortico-cortical interactions in spatial attention: A combined ERP/TMS study. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[24]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Eimer,et al.  Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colors: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness , 2003, Vision Research.