Learning From School Restructuring

We analyzed cases of restructuring experiments in three elementary schools, each with ethnically diverse populations, located in large urban school districts in different parts of the United States. Over 2 years, we gathered data on views and classroom writing practices of two teachers in each school through on-site interviews and observations. We also interviewed the principal and other support personnel. We found that these three schools did successfully restructure; changes included new student grouping patterns, new ways of allocating time for subject matter, teachers meeting together as a whole school or in teams, and access to new ideas through professional development opportunities. Through close analyses of teachers’ classroom practices, we learned that changing teachers’ practice is primarily a problem of learning, not a problem of organization. While school structures can provide opportunities for learning new practices, the structures, by themselves, do not cause the learning to occur.

[1]  J. Oakes,et al.  Critical perspectives on the organization and improvement of schooling , 1986 .

[2]  D. Cohen.  Teaching for Understanding: Challenges for Policy and Practice , 1993 .

[3]  H. Marshall,et al.  Redefining Student Learning: Roots of Educational Change , 1992 .

[4]  Donald H. Graves,et al.  The Author’s Chair , 1983, Language Arts.

[5]  Virginia Richardson,et al.  Significant and Worthwhile Change in Teaching Practice , 1990 .

[6]  Lawrence D. Shriberg,et al.  Alternative Research Perspectives , 1998 .

[7]  M. Fullan.  The New Meaning of Educational Change , 1990 .

[8]  Reinholdine Breien-Pierson.  The influence of brain hemisphericity on the composing process of twelfth graders , 1990 .

[9]  Judith Westphal Irwin,et al.  Reading/writing connections : learning from research , 1992 .

[10]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[11]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Restructuring Schools: The Next Generation of Educational Reform , 1990 .

[12]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnographic Research and the Problem of Data Reduction1 , 1981 .

[13]  Ann Lieberman,et al.  The Meaning of Scholarly Activity and the Building of Community , 1992 .

[14]  Larry Cuban.  How Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in American Classrooms, 1890-1990 , 1984 .

[15]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  An Attainable Version of High Literacy: Approaches to Teaching Higher-Order Skills in Reading and Writing , 1987 .

[16]  Ann Lieberman,et al.  Restructuring Schools: What Matters and What Works. , 1990 .

[17]  Joseph A. Murphy.  Restructuring Schools: Capturing and Assessing the Phenomena , 1991 .

[18]  Fred M. Newmann.  Beyond Common Sense in Educational Restructuring , 1993 .

[19]  Linda M. McNeil,et al.  Contradictions of Control: School Structure and School Knowledge , 1988 .

[20]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Restructuring in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning, and School Organization , 1996 .

[21]  Milbrey W. McLaughlin,et al.  Teachers' work : individuals, colleagues, and contexts , 1993 .

[22]  J. Goodlad.  A Place Called School , 1984 .

[23]  Diane G. Berreth.  Restructuring Schools , 1988 .

[24]  David B. Tyack.  “Restructuring” in Historical Perspective: Tinkering toward Utopia , 1990, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[25]  James A. Berlin.  Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900 - 1985 , 1987 .

[26]  David Bartholomae,et al.  The teaching of writing , 1986 .

[27]  Bernice McCarthy,et al.  The 4mat System: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right-Left Mode Techniques , 1980 .

[28]  H. Sharp.  The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform: Can We Change Course Before It's Too Late? , 1991 .