Handyfuge Microfluidic for On-Site Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.

Low-cost, rapid, and accurate acquisition of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) is key to limiting the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Until now, conventional antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) methods are typically time-consuming, high-cost, and labor-intensive, making them difficult to accomplish this task. Herein, an electricity-free, portable, and robust handyfuge microfluidic chip was developed for on-site AST, termed handyfuge-AST. With simply handheld centrifugation, the bacterial-antibiotic mixtures with accurate antibiotic concentration gradients could be generated in less than 5 min. The accurate MIC values of single antibiotics (including ampicillin, kanamycin, and chloramphenicol) or their combinations against Escherichia coli could be obtained within 5 h. To further meet the growing demands of point-of-care testing, we upgraded our handyfuge-AST with a pH-based colorimetric strategy, enabling naked eye recognition or intelligent recognition with a homemade mobile app. Through a comparative study of 60 clinical data (10 clinical samples corresponding to six commonly used antibiotics), the accurate MICs by handyfuge-AST with 100% categorical agreements were achieved compared to clinical standard methods (area under curves, AUCs = 1.00). The handyfuge-AST could be used as a low-cost, portable, and robust point-of-care device to rapidly obtain accurate MIC values, which significantly limit the progress of AMR.

[1]  Bifeng Liu,et al.  Smartphone-based platforms implementing microfluidic detection with image-based artificial intelligence , 2023, Nature Communications.

[2]  Hiep Van Nguyen,et al.  Serially diluting centrifugal microfluidics for high-throughput gold nanoparticle synthesis using an automated and portable workstation , 2022, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[3]  I. Gajić,et al.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Comprehensive Review of Currently Used Methods , 2022, Antibiotics.

[4]  Bifeng Liu,et al.  Hand-powered vacuum-driven microfluidic gradient generator for high-throughput antimicrobial susceptibility testing. , 2022, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[5]  Bifeng Liu,et al.  Multi-reagents dispensing centrifugal microfluidics for point-of-care testing. , 2022, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[6]  K. Carroll,et al.  A Cascaded Droplet Microfluidic Platform Enables High-Throughput Single Cell Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing at Scale. , 2021, Small methods.

[7]  M. Boerries,et al.  Automated library preparation for whole genome sequencing by centrifugal microfluidics. , 2021, Analytica Chimica Acta.

[8]  Fei Li,et al.  A Portable Digital Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Platform Based on Microgel Array and Hand-Held Reader. , 2021, ACS sensors.

[9]  N. Rowan,et al.  Development of a low-temperature extrusion process for production of GRAS bioactive-polymer loaded compounds for targeting antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  K. Carroll,et al.  Droplet‐Based Single‐Cell Measurements of 16S rRNA Enable Integrated Bacteria Identification and Pheno‐Molecular Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Clinical Samples in 30 min , 2021, Advanced science.

[11]  N. Darzentas,et al.  Automation of amplicon-based library preparation for next generation sequencing by centrifugal microfluidics. , 2020, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  Yoon‐Kyoung Cho,et al.  A fidget spinner for the point-of-care diagnosis of urinary tract infection , 2020, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  K. Qian,et al.  Precision Diagnosis for the Era of Personalized Medicine , 2020 .

[14]  A. van Belkum,et al.  Innovative and rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems , 2020, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[15]  H. J. Pandya,et al.  Emerging technologies for antibiotic susceptibility testing. , 2019, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[16]  T. Xia,et al.  Engineered Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite Capable of Preventing the Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance. , 2019, ACS nano.

[17]  Gerald Urban,et al.  Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bloodstream infection on SlipChip. , 2019, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[18]  Wenjing Kang,et al.  Ultrafast Parallelized Microfluidic Platform for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram Positive and Negative Bacteria. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Weibo Fang,et al.  Smartphone-based mobile digital PCR device for DNA quantitative analysis with high accuracy. , 2018, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[20]  E. Segal,et al.  Recent Advances in the Race to Design a Rapid Diagnostic Test for Antimicrobial Resistance. , 2018, ACS sensors.

[21]  Jinzhao Song,et al.  Smartphone-Based Mobile Detection Platform for Molecular Diagnostics and Spatiotemporal Disease Mapping. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  Gwo-Bin Lee,et al.  A microfluidic device for antimicrobial susceptibility testing based on a broth dilution method. , 2017, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[23]  E. Brown,et al.  Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era , 2016, Nature.

[24]  Tae Seok Seo,et al.  Centrifugal loop-mediated isothermal amplification microdevice for rapid, multiplex and colorimetric foodborne pathogen detection. , 2016, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[25]  James P Landers,et al.  Inexpensive, rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices using overhead transparencies and a laser print, cut and laminate fabrication method , 2015, Nature Protocols.

[26]  M. McConnell,et al.  Progress on the development of rapid methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. , 2013, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[27]  S. Hultgren,et al.  Urinary Tract Infection as a Preventable Cause of Pregnancy Complications: Opportunities, Challenges, and a Global Call to Action , 2013, Global advances in health and medicine.

[28]  Jingqing Liu,et al.  Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing in a microfluidic pH sensor. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  Betsy Foxman,et al.  The epidemiology of urinary tract infection , 2010, Nature Reviews Urology.

[30]  I. Peitz,et al.  Single-cell bacteria growth monitoring by automated DEP-facilitated image analysis. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[31]  Vincent Gau,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using high surface-to-volume ratio microchannels. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  M. Ferraro,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a review of general principles and contemporary practices. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[33]  A. Wheeler,et al.  A digital microfluidic approach to homogeneous enzyme assays. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[34]  R. Hancock,et al.  Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[35]  A. deMello Control and detection of chemical reactions in microfluidic systems , 2006, Nature.

[36]  Shengnian Wang,et al.  Design of a compact disk-like microfluidic platform for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[37]  Johan W Mouton,et al.  European harmonization of MIC breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria. , 2003, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[38]  Heinz Schmid,et al.  Microfluidic Networks for Chemical Patterning of Substrates: Design and Application to Bioassays , 1998 .

[39]  E. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria , 1991, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[40]  J. Hampton,et al.  Drugs for the prevention of myocardial infarction. , 1969, American Journal of the Medical Sciences.

[41]  T. Young III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids , 1805, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.