The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning

It seems uncontroversial that providing feedback after a test, in the form of the correct answer, enhances learning. In real-world educational situations, however, the time available for learning is often constrained— and feedback takes time. We report an experiment in which total time for learning was fixed, thereby creating a trade-off between spending time receiving feedback and spending time on other learning activities. Our results suggest that providing feedback is not universally beneficial. Indeed, under some circumstances, taking time to provide feedback can have a negative net effect on learning. We also found that learners appear to have some insight about the costs of feedback; when they were allowed to control feedback, they often skipped unnecessary feedback in favor of additional retrieval attempts, and they benefited from doing so. These results underscore the importance of considering the costs and benefits of interventions designed to enhance learning.

[1]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Optimising self-regulated study: The benefits—and costs—of dropping flashcards , 2008, Memory.

[2]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning , 2008, Science.

[3]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention , 2007 .

[4]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Optimising Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming , 2009 .

[5]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Metacognitive Control: Children's Short-Term Versus Long-Term Study Strategies , 2005 .

[6]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[7]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests , 1972 .

[8]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing , 2009, Memory.

[10]  Troy A. Smith,et al.  Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The promise and perils of self-regulated study , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  H. Pashler,et al.  When does feedback facilitate learning of words? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Norms of paired-associate recall during multitrial learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. , 1994, Memory.

[14]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[16]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Feedback and sentence learning , 1971 .

[18]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? , 2009 .

[19]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Conditions under which feedback facilitates learning from programmed lessons. , 1972 .

[20]  David B. Daniel,et al.  Learning for Life: An Ecological Approach to Pedagogical Research , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[21]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The spacing effect: Consolidation or differential encoding? , 1970 .