The food intake recording software system is valid among fourth-grade children.

OBJECTIVES To assess the validity of the Food Intake Recording Software System (FIRSSt) against observation of school lunch and a 24-hour dietary recall (24hDR); and to test the effects of sequencing, observation and a hair sample as a bogus pipeline on accuracy of dietary report. DESIGN Six-group design systematically varying sequence of self-report (FIRSSt vs 24hDR), observation of school lunch and hair sample as a bogus pipeline manipulation, with random assignment of participants. SUBJECTS/SETTING 138 fourth-grade students in 2 elementary schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Accuracy of reported food consumption was measured in terms of matches, intrusions, and omissions among the FIRSSt, 24hDR, and as observed at school lunch. Students also completed self-report of performance with FIRSSt. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED t tests, Pearson correlations, analysis of variance, factor analysis. RESULTS When compared with school lunch observation for one meal, FIRSSt attained 46% match, 24% intrusion and 30% omission rates, while a dietitian-conducted 24hDR obtained 59% match, 17% intrusion, and 24% omission rates. FIRSSt attained 60% match, 15% intrusion, and 24% omission rates against 24hDR for all meals in the previous day. There was no evidence of sequence of assessment affecting accuracy indicators, but there was a weak effect of school lunch observation on percent intrusions. Obtaining a hair sample reduced the omission rate for FIRSSt vs 24hDR and increased the match rate for 24hDR vs observation, thereby enhancing this as a bogus pipeline procedure. Children generally enjoyed completing FIRSSt. Hispanic children were more likely to report problems using FIRSSt. APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS FIRSSt is somewhat less accurate than a dietitian-conducted 24hDR. However, this lower-cost procedure provides a promising method for assessing diet among children. Observation of consumption at school lunch may be reactive and artificially increase agreement. Obtaining a hair sample as a bogus pipeline may be a valuable technique for enhancing the accuracy of dietary assessment among children.

[1]  T. Baranowski,et al.  Computer Software Design for Children's Recording of Food Intake , 1998 .

[2]  Rachel K. Johnson,et al.  Comparison of multiple-pass 24-hour recall estimates of energy intake with total energy expenditure determined by the doubly labeled water method in young children. , 1996, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[3]  L A Lytle,et al.  Validation of 24-hour recalls assisted by food records in third-grade children. The CATCH Collaborative Group. , 1993, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[4]  J. Gittelsohn,et al.  Accuracy of estimating food intake by observation. , 1994, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[5]  T J Cole,et al.  Between- and within-subject variation in nutrient intake from infancy to old age: estimating the number of days required to rank dietary intakes with desired precision. , 1989, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[6]  C. Perry,et al.  Validating fourth-grade students' self-report of dietary intake: results from the 5 A Day Power Plus program. , 1998, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[7]  T. Baranowski,et al.  Dietary and physical activity assessment in school-aged children: measurement issues. , 1991, The Journal of school health.

[8]  T. Baranowski,et al.  Observation in assessment of children's dietary practices. , 1991, The Journal of school health.

[9]  S. Baxter,et al.  Impact of gender, ethnicity, meal component, and time interval between eating and reporting on accuracy of fourth-graders' self-reports of school lunch. , 1997, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[10]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Deanna M. Hoelscher,et al.  Dietary Assessment Methods among School-Aged Children: Validity and Reliability , 2000 .

[12]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[13]  D Feskanich,et al.  Computerized collection and analysis of dietary intake information. , 1989, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[14]  Henry A. Feldman,et al.  Perspective in practiceValidation of 24-hour recalls assisted by food records in third-grade children☆ , 1993 .

[15]  C. Perry,et al.  The validity of smoking self-reports by adolescents: a reexamination of the bogus pipeline procedure. , 1987, Addictive behaviors.

[16]  T. Baranowski,et al.  The accuracy of children's self-reports of diet: Family Health Project. , 1986, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[17]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  Do unsuccessful dieters intentionally underreport food intake? , 1998, The International journal of eating disorders.

[18]  G. Scott Owen,et al.  Practical issues in multimedia user interface design for computer-based instruction , 1996 .

[19]  G. Colditz,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire among fourth to seventh grade inner-city school children: implications of age and day-to-day variation in dietary intake , 1999, Public Health Nutrition.