Understanding relationships among ecosystem services across spatial scales and over time

Sustaining ecosystem services (ES), mitigating their tradeoffs and avoiding unfavorable future trajectories are pressing social-environmental challenges that require enhanced understanding of their relationships across scales. Current knowledge of ES relationships is often constrained to one spatial scale or one snapshot in time. In this research, we integrated biophysical modeling with future scenarios to examine changes in relationships among eight ES indicators from 2001–2070 across three spatial scales—grid cell, subwatershed, and watershed. We focused on the Yahara Watershed (Wisconsin) in the Midwestern United States—an exemplar for many urbanizing agricultural landscapes. Relationships among ES indicators changed over time; some relationships exhibited high interannual variations (e.g. drainage vs. food production, nitrate leaching vs. net ecosystem exchange) and even reversed signs over time (e.g. perennial grass production vs. phosphorus yield). Robust patterns were detected for relationships among some regulating services (e.g. soil retention vs. water quality) across three spatial scales, but other relationships lacked simple scaling rules. This was especially true for relationships of food production vs. water quality, and drainage vs. number of days with runoff >10 mm, which differed substantially across spatial scales. Our results also showed that local tradeoffs between food production and water quality do not necessarily scale up, so reducing local tradeoffs may be insufficient to mitigate such tradeoffs at the watershed scale. We further synthesized these cross-scale patterns into a typology of factors that could drive changes in ES relationships across scales: (1) effects of biophysical connections, (2) effects of dominant drivers, (3) combined effects of biophysical linkages and dominant drivers, and (4) artificial scale effects, and concluded with management implications. Our study highlights the importance of taking a dynamic perspective and accounting for spatial scales in monitoring and management to sustain future ES.

[1]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Extreme precipitation and phosphorus loads from two agricultural watersheds , 2018 .

[2]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Scenarios reveal pathways to sustain future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. , 2018, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  Martin Volk,et al.  Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies : Main concepts, methods and the road ahead , 2017 .

[4]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Unpacking ecosystem service bundles : Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services , 2017 .

[5]  S. Carpenter,et al.  The Influence of Legacy P on Lake Water Quality in a Midwestern Agricultural Watershed , 2017, Ecosystems.

[6]  Ruifang Hao,et al.  Relationship between paired ecosystem services in the grassland and agro-pastoral transitional zone of China using the constraint line method , 2017 .

[7]  Brian J. Harvey,et al.  Historical foundations and future directions in macrosystems ecology. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[8]  Brian E. Robinson,et al.  Using ecosystem service trade‐offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices , 2016 .

[9]  Xi Chen,et al.  From qualitative to quantitative environmental scenarios: Translating storylines into biophysical modeling inputs at the watershed scale , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Disaggregating the evidence linking biodiversity and ecosystem services , 2016, Nature Communications.

[11]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Scale and ecosystem services: how do observation, management, and analysis shift with scale—lessons from Québec , 2016 .

[12]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Local Perspectives and Global Archetypes in Scenario Development , 2016 .

[13]  S. Gergel,et al.  Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history , 2016 .

[14]  Albert V. Norström,et al.  Social-ecological drivers of multiple ecosystem services: what variables explain patterns of ecosystem services across the Norrström drainage basin? , 2016 .

[15]  S. Carver,et al.  Opportunities to utilize traditional phenological knowledge to support adaptive management of social-ecological systems vulnerable to changes in climate and fire regimes , 2016 .

[16]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Multi-scale analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs in urbanizing drylands of China: A case study in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Yulin region , 2016 .

[17]  M. Turner,et al.  Spatial fit between water quality policies and hydrologic ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural landscape , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  Taking the Mumbo Out of the Jumbo: Progress Towards a Robust Basis for Ecological Scaling , 2016, Ecosystems.

[19]  M. Turner,et al.  Importance of landscape heterogeneity in sustaining hydrologic ecosystem services in an agricultural watershed , 2015 .

[20]  E. Bennett,et al.  Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Samuel C. Zipper,et al.  Untangling the effects of shallow groundwater and soil texture as drivers of subfield‐scale yield variability , 2015 .

[22]  R. Naiman,et al.  Environmental change: prospects for conservation and agriculture in a southwest Australia biodiversity hotspot , 2015 .

[23]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Plausible futures of a social-ecological system: Yahara watershed, Wisconsin, USA , 2015 .

[24]  T. McPhearson,et al.  Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units , 2015 .

[25]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[26]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world , 2014 .

[27]  J. R. King,et al.  Climate fails to predict wood decomposition at regional scales , 2014 .

[28]  Steven P. Loheide,et al.  Influence of groundwater on plant water use and productivity: Development of an integrated ecosystem ― Variably saturated soil water flow model , 2014 .

[29]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape , 2014 .

[30]  P. Soranno,et al.  Macrosystems ecology: understanding ecological patterns and processes at continental scales , 2014 .

[31]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[32]  Jiangxiao Qiu,et al.  Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  R. Scholes,et al.  Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social-ecological systems and their ecosystem services , 2013 .

[34]  Christopher J. Kucharik,et al.  Climate‐induced changes in biome distribution, NPP, and hydrology in the Upper Midwest U.S.: A case study for potential vegetation , 2013 .

[35]  M. Helmers,et al.  Targeting Perennial Vegetation in Agricultural Landscapes for Enhancing Ecosystem Services , 2022 .

[36]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs , 2012 .

[37]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .

[38]  I. Chaubey,et al.  Effectiveness of Low Impact Development Practices: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research , 2012, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[39]  G. Daily,et al.  Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Jean E T Mclain,et al.  Impacts of urbanization on groundwater quality and recharge in a semi-arid alluvial basin , 2011 .

[41]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Solutions for a cultivated planet , 2011, Nature.

[42]  Robert A. Holland,et al.  Spatial covariation between freshwater and terrestrial ecosystem services. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[43]  A. Power.  Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  G. McIsaac,et al.  Miscanthus and switchgrass production in central Illinois: impacts on hydrology and inorganic nitrogen leaching. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[45]  James R. Craig,et al.  Runoff–infiltration partitioning using an upscaled Green–Ampt solution , 2010 .

[46]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[48]  K. Gaston,et al.  Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities , 2009 .

[49]  Amilcare Porporato,et al.  Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory and models across scales , 2009 .

[50]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Non‐linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection , 2009 .

[52]  E. Barbier.  Ecosystem Service Trade-offs , 2009 .

[53]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world , 2008 .

[54]  Hugh Turral,et al.  Water quality implications of raising crop water productivity , 2008 .

[55]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[56]  C. Kucharik,et al.  Residue, respiration, and residuals: Evaluation of a dynamic agroecosystem model using eddy flux measurements and biometric data , 2007 .

[57]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Domesticated Nature: Shaping Landscapes and Ecosystems for Human Welfare , 2007, Science.

[58]  D. García,et al.  Scale‐Dependent Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Hawthorn Pollination, Frugivory, and Seed Predation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[59]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production , 2007 .

[60]  Orie L. Loucks,et al.  Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology : methods and applications , 2006 .

[61]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services , 2006 .

[62]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  ROLE OF WATERSHED SUBDIVISION ON MODELING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WITH SWAT 1 , 2006 .

[63]  G. Cumming,et al.  Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions , 2006 .

[64]  Debra P. C. Peters,et al.  A FRAMEWORK AND METHODS FOR SIMPLIFYING COMPLEX LANDSCAPES TO REDUCE UNCERTAINTY IN PREDICTIONS , 2006 .

[65]  R. O'Neill,et al.  MULTISCALE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS AND NITROGEN CONCENTRATIONS IN STREAMS , 2006 .

[66]  R. Macarthur.  The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture , 2005 .

[67]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[68]  Jianguo Wu.  Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[69]  C. Kucharik.  Evaluation of a Process-Based Agro-Ecosystem Model (Agro-IBIS) across the U.S. Corn Belt: Simulations of the Interannual Variability in Maize Yield , 2003 .

[70]  C. Kucharik,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of land management and climate variability on crop production and nitrate export across the Upper Mississippi Basin , 2003 .

[71]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  Scaling Relations in Experimental Ecology , 2001 .

[72]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. , 2001, Science.

[73]  D. Schneider.  The Rise of the Concept of Scale in Ecology , 2001 .

[74]  Michael T. Coe,et al.  Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure , 2000 .

[75]  Robert J. Whittaker,et al.  Ecology: Scaling, energetics and diversity , 1999, Nature.

[76]  W. W. Nelson,et al.  Nitrate losses through subsurface tile drainage in Conservation Reserve Program, alfalfa, and row crop systems , 1997 .

[77]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes , 1996 .

[78]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[79]  J. Wiens.  Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[80]  R. O'Neill.  A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[81]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .