Performance of rate detector algorithms for an integrated GPS/INS system in the presence of slowly growing error

In the Global Positioning System, there is no provision for real-time integrity information within the Standard Positioning Service, by design. However, in safety critical sectors like aviation, stringent integrity performance requirements must be met. This can be achieved using the special augmentation systems or RAIM (Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring) or both. RAIM, the most cost-effective method relies on data consistency, and therefore requires redundant measurements for its operation. An external aid to provide this redundancy can be in the form of an Inertial Navigation system. This should enable continued performance even when no redundant satellite measurements are available. An algorithm presented in previous papers by the authors detects the rate of slowly growing errors. The algorithm was shown to be effective for early detection of slowly growing errors that belong to the class of most difficult to detect errors. Firstly, rate detector is tested for varying faults. Secondly, real data are used to validate the rate detector algorithm. The data are extensively analyzed to ascertain whether it is suitable for integrity and fault diagnostics. A modification to the original rate detector algorithm is suggested by addition of a bias state to the dynamic model. The performance is then compared with the existing techniques and substantial improvement is shown.

[1]  Young C. Lee,et al.  A Performance Analysis of a Tightly Coupled GPS/Inertial System for Two Integrity Monitoring Methods , 1999 .

[2]  Washington Y. Ochieng,et al.  Detecting Multiple failures in GPS/INS integrated system: A Novel architecture for Integrity Monitoring , 2009 .

[3]  Shaojun Feng,et al.  Integrity of an integrated GPS/INS system in the presence of slowly growing errors. Part I: A critical review , 2007 .

[4]  J. D. Gautier,et al.  Using the GPS/INS Generalized Evaluation Tool (GIGET) for the Comparison of Loosely Coupled, Tightly Coupled and Ultra-Tightly Coupled Integrated Navigation Systems , 2003 .

[5]  Shaojun Feng,et al.  Integrity of an integrated GPS/INS system in the presence of slowly growing errors. Part II: analysis , 2007 .

[6]  Washington Y. Ochieng,et al.  GPS Integrity and Potential Impact on Aviation Safety , 2003, Journal of Navigation.

[7]  John W. Lavrakas,et al.  Status update on GPS integrity failure modes and effects analysis , 2004 .

[8]  Umar Iqbal Bhatti,et al.  Improved integrity algorithms for the integrated GPS/INS systems in the presence of slowly growing errors , 2007 .

[9]  John W. Diesel,et al.  GPS/IRS AIME: Certification for Sole Means and Solution to RF Interference , 1996 .

[10]  Chris Hide,et al.  An Investigation in the Use of GPS and INS Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2005 .

[11]  Christophe Macabiau,et al.  Sequential RAIM designed to detect combined step ramp pseudo-range errors , 2006 .

[12]  John W. Lavrakas,et al.  GPS Integrity Failure Modes and Effects Analysis , 2003 .

[13]  Washington Y. Ochieng,et al.  Failure Modes and Models for Integrated GPS/INS Systems , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[14]  R. Grover Brown,et al.  A Baseline GPS RAIM Scheme and a Note on the Equivalence of Three RAIM Methods , 1992 .