Assessing the interfacial strength of an amorphous–crystalline interface

Abstract In this study, an amorphous-ZrCu/crystalline-Zr nanolaminate (500 nm each layer) was initially synthesised using sputter deposition and then fabricated into micropillar samples using focused ion beam machining with the amorphous–crystalline (a–c) interfaces inclined 45° to the pillar axis. These pillars were subsequently tested in compression in order to study the response of a–c interfaces to the applied shear stress, and further compared with the one that tested with their a–c interfaces normal to the compressive direction. By combining the stress–strain behavior and electron microscopic observations of fracture mode, we were able to estimate the a–c interfacial strength. It was strong (∼1.3 GPa), it could effectively transfer the load and it was capable of accommodating large shear strain, but it was not strong enough to suppress the interfacial sliding. Molecular statics simulations were also carried out to reveal the elastic–plastic behavior and, in particular, the deformation mode of the pillars. The computed results were in excellent agreement with the experimental observations.

[1]  J. Hosson,et al.  Tribological and mechanical properties of high power laser surface-treated metallic glasses , 2007 .

[2]  Yuan Wu,et al.  Bulk Metallic Glass Composites with Transformation‐Mediated Work‐Hardening and Ductility , 2010, Advanced materials.

[3]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Effects of nanocrystalline and ultrafine grain sizes on constitutive behavior and shear bands in iron , 2003 .

[4]  S. Tsai,et al.  Introduction to composite materials , 1980 .

[5]  Massobrio,et al.  Development of an N-body interatomic potential for hcp and bcc zirconium. , 1991, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[6]  C. T. Wang,et al.  Cyclic transformation between nanocrystalline and amorphous phases in Zr based intermetallic alloys during ARB , 2007 .

[7]  J. C. Huang,et al.  Microscale deformation behavior of amorphous/nanocrystalline multilayered pillars , 2010 .

[8]  T. Nieh,et al.  Tensile properties of a free-standing Cu/Zr nanolaminate (or compositionally-modulated thin film) , 1999 .

[9]  X. Du,et al.  Superplastic-like deformation in metallic amorphous/crystalline nanolayered micropillars , 2012 .

[10]  G. Wang,et al.  Transformation-mediated ductility in CuZr-based bulk metallic glasses. , 2010, Nature materials.

[11]  P. Liaw,et al.  A 200nm thick glass-forming metallic film for fatigue-property enhancements , 2006 .

[12]  Rabinowitz,et al.  Two-photon spectroscopy of MgO:Ni2+ , 1991, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[13]  C. Kittel.  Introduction to solid state physics , 1954 .

[14]  A. Evans,et al.  The fracture resistance of metal-ceramic interfaces , 1993 .

[15]  Jiangbo Cheng,et al.  Characterization of mechanical properties of FeCrBSiMnNbY metallic glass coatings , 2009 .

[16]  S. Kuan,et al.  Tensile behavior of amorphous/nanocrystalline ZrCu/Cu multilayered films with graded interfaces , 2012 .

[17]  On the latest stage of transformation from nanocrystalline to amorphous phases during ARB: Simulation and experiment , 2006 .

[18]  T. Nieh,et al.  Sample size effect and microcompression of Mg65Cu25Gd10 metallic glass , 2007 .

[19]  M. A. Karolewski.  Tight-binding potentials for sputtering simulations with fcc and bcc metals , 2001 .

[20]  Manfred Rühle,et al.  The influence of interface impurities on fracture energy of UHV diffusion bonded metal-ceramic bicrystals , 1994 .

[21]  Douglas C. Hofmann,et al.  Designing metallic glass matrix composites with high toughness and tensile ductility , 2008, Nature.

[22]  A. Hamza,et al.  Ductile crystalline–amorphous nanolaminates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  B. Legrand,et al.  Thermodynamical and structural properties of f.c.c. transition metals using a simple tight-binding model , 1989 .

[24]  Krishan K. Chawla,et al.  Composite Materials: Science and Engineering , 1987 .

[25]  James B. Adams,et al.  Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method , 1993, cond-mat/9306054.

[26]  Herbert F. Wang,et al.  Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties. A Handbook , 1971 .

[27]  Takeshi Fujita,et al.  Interface structure and properties of a brass-reinforced Ni59Zr20Ti16Si2Sn3 bulk metallic glass composite , 2008 .

[28]  J. Eckert,et al.  Fracture mechanisms in bulk metallic glassy materials. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[29]  Amit Misra,et al.  Deformability of ultrahigh strength 5 nm Cu/Nb nanolayered composites , 2008 .

[30]  J. C. Huang,et al.  Tension behavior of free-standing amorphous film and amorphous–crystalline nanolaminates in submicron scale , 2011 .

[31]  S. Kuan,et al.  Micromechanical response for the amorphous/amorphous nanolaminates , 2010 .

[32]  Rosato,et al.  Tight-binding potentials for transition metals and alloys. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[33]  J. C. Huang,et al.  A nanoscaled underlayer confinement approach for achieving extraordinarily plastic amorphous thin film , 2009 .

[34]  T. W. Clyne,et al.  An Introduction to Composite Materials: Fabrication , 1996 .