Towards closed loop modeling: Evaluating the prospects for creating recurrently regrounded aggregate simulation models using particle filtering

Public health agencies traditionally rely heavily on epidemiological reporting for notifiable disease control, but increasingly apply simulation models for forecasting and to understand intervention tradeoffs. Unfortunately, such models traditionally lack capacity to easily incorporate information from epidemiological data feeds. Here, we introduce particle filtering and demonstrate how this approach can be used to readily incorporate recurrently available new data so as to robustly tolerate - and correct for - both model limitations and noisy data, and to aid in parameter estimation, while imposing far less onerous assumptions regarding the mathematical framework and epidemiological and measurement processes than other proposed solutions. By comparing against synthetic ground truth produced by an agent-based model, we demonstrate the benefits conferred by particle filtering parameters and state variables even in the context of an aggregate, incomplete and systematically biased compartmental model, and note important avenues for future work to make such approaches more widely accessible.

[1]  A. Doucet,et al.  Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods , 2010 .

[2]  Kevin G. Stanley,et al.  Integrating Epidemiological Modeling and Surveillance Data Feeds: A Kalman Filter Based Approach , 2014, SBP.

[3]  P. Kaye Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[4]  Nicholas G. Polson,et al.  Tracking Epidemics with State-space SEIR and Google Flu Trends , 2009 .

[5]  Hazhir Rahmandad,et al.  Heterogeneity and Network Structure in the Dynamics of Diffusion: Comparing Agent-Based and Differential Equation Models , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[6]  A. Doucet,et al.  A Tutorial on Particle Filtering and Smoothing: Fifteen years later , 2008 .

[7]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[8]  M. Li,et al.  Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods , 2015 .

[9]  Michael Isard,et al.  CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  S. J. Koopman Discussion of `Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods – C. Andrieu, A. Doucet and R. Holenstein’ [Review of: Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods] , 2010 .

[11]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction , 2011 .

[12]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics , 1927 .

[13]  Nicholas G. Polson,et al.  Tracking Epidemics With Google Flu Trends Data and a State-Space SEIR Model , 2012, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[14]  Simone Gabbriellini,et al.  Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction by Steven F. Railsback and Volker Grimm , 2016, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[15]  M. Keeling,et al.  Networks and epidemic models , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  Simon Cauchemez,et al.  new approach to characterising infectious disease transmission dynamics from entinel surveillance : Application to the Italian 2009 – 2010 A / H 1 N 1 influenza andemic , 2012 .

[17]  N. Gordon,et al.  Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation , 1993 .

[18]  F. Poynter A Journal of the Plague Year , 1970, Medical History.

[19]  M. Keeling The implications of network structure for epidemic dynamics. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.