Phage as versatile nanoink for printing 3-D cell-laden scaffolds.

UNLABELLED Bioprinting is an emerging technology for producing tissue-mimetic 3-D structures using cell-containing hydrogels (bioink). Various synthetic and natural hydrogels with key characteristics, including biocompatibility, biodegradability, printability and crosslinkability, have been employed as ink materials in bioprinting. Choosing the right cell-containing "bioink" material is the most essential step for fabricating 3-D constructs with a controlled mechanical and biochemical microenvironment that can lead to successful tissue regeneration and repair. Here, we demonstrate that the genetically engineered M13 phage holds great potential for use as a versatile nanoink for printing 3-D cell-laden matrices. In particular, M13 phages displaying integrin-binding (GRGDS) and calcium-binding (DDYD) domains on their surface were blended with alginate to successfully form Ca(2+)-crosslinked hydrogels. Furthermore, 3-D cell-laden scaffolds with high cell viability were generated after optimizing the printing process. The MC3T3-E1 cells within these scaffolds showed enhanced proliferation and differentiation rates that increased proportionally with the concentration of phages in the 3-D matrices compared with the rates of cells in pure alginate scaffolds. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Bioprinting is an emerging technology for producing tissue-mimetic 3-D structures using cell-containing hydrogels called bioink. Choosing the right bioink is essential for fabricating 3-D structures with controlled mechanical and biochemical properties which lead to successful tissue regeneration. Therefore, there is a growing demand for a new bioink material that can be designed from molecular level. Here, we demonstrate that genetically engineered M13 phage holds great potential for use as versatile bioink. The phage-based bioink benefits from its replicability, self-assembling property, and tunable molecular design and enables bioprinted scaffolds to exhibit improved cell viability, proliferation and differentiation. This study opens the door for the development of genetically tunable nanofibrous bioink materials which closely mimic natural structural proteins in the extracellular matrix.

[1]  C. Mello,et al.  Chemical modification of M13 bacteriophage and its application in cancer cell imaging. , 2010, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[2]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Increased mixing improves hydrogel homogeneity and quality of three-dimensional printed constructs. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[3]  Gordon T. Stewart,et al.  Liquid crystals in biology I. Historical, biological and medical aspects , 2003 .

[4]  GeunHyung Kim,et al.  Cell-laden poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/alginate hybrid scaffolds fabricated by an aerosol cross-linking process for obtaining homogeneous cell distribution: fabrication, seeding efficiency, and cell proliferation and distribution. , 2013, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[5]  Seth Fraden,et al.  Entropically driven microphase transitions in mixtures of colloidal rods and spheres , 1998, Nature.

[6]  B D Boyan,et al.  Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  Alessandro Giacomello,et al.  Cardiac tissue engineering using tissue printing technology and human cardiac progenitor cells. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[8]  Jos Malda,et al.  Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[9]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  J. Rong,et al.  Oriented cell growth on self-assembled bacteriophage M13 thin films. , 2008, Chemical communications.

[11]  Aleksandr Ovsianikov,et al.  Laser fabrication of three-dimensional CAD scaffolds from photosensitive gelatin for applications in tissue engineering. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[12]  Heather Sheardown,et al.  Controlling cellular activity by manipulating silicone surface roughness. , 2010, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[13]  Sumathy Arumuganathar,et al.  Coaxial Aerodynamically Assisted Bio‐jets: A Versatile Paradigm for Directly Engineering Living Primary Organisms , 2007 .

[14]  Hyeongjin Lee,et al.  Fabrication of cell-laden three-dimensional alginate-scaffolds with an aerosol cross-linking process , 2012 .

[15]  B. Duan,et al.  3D bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[16]  Matthias P. Lutolf,et al.  Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate , 2009, Nature.

[17]  Anna Merzlyak,et al.  Genetically engineered nanofiber-like viruses for tissue regenerating materials. , 2009, Nano letters.

[18]  Fabien Guillemot,et al.  Cell patterning technologies for organotypic tissue fabrication. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[19]  Seung-Wuk Lee,et al.  Fabrication of engineered M13 bacteriophages into liquid crystalline films and fibers for directional growth and encapsulation of fibroblasts , 2010 .

[20]  Z. Dogic,et al.  Ordered phases of filamentous viruses , 2006 .

[21]  James J. Yoo,et al.  Complex heterogeneous tissue constructs containing multiple cell types prepared by inkjet printing technology. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[22]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[23]  Kimberly A Kelly,et al.  M13-templated magnetic nanoparticles for targeted in vivo imaging of prostate cancer. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[24]  GeunHyung Kim,et al.  Optimal size of cell-laden hydrogel cylindrical struts for enhancing the cellular activities and their application to hybrid scaffolds. , 2014, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[25]  Seung-Wuk Lee,et al.  Engineering phage materials with desired peptide display: rational design sustained through natural selection. , 2009, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[26]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Organ printing: from bioprinter to organ biofabrication line. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[27]  Yongnian Yan,et al.  An cell-assembly derived physiological 3D model of the metabolic syndrome, based on adipose-derived stromal cells and a gelatin/alginate/fibrinogen matrix. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[28]  S. Van Vlierberghe,et al.  Biopolymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a review. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[29]  Jin-Woo Oh,et al.  Phage-chips for novel optically readable tissue engineering assays. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  A. Doraiswamy,et al.  Laser microfabrication of hydroxyapatite-osteoblast-like cell composites. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[31]  Dong-Woo Cho,et al.  Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[32]  GeunHyung Kim,et al.  Cells (MC3T3-E1)-laden alginate scaffolds fabricated by a modified solid-freeform fabrication process supplemented with an aerosol spraying. , 2012, Biomacromolecules.

[33]  Kevin E. Healy,et al.  Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Wim E Hennink,et al.  25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication , 2013, Advanced materials.

[35]  P. R. van Weeren,et al.  Hyaluronic acid and dextran-based semi-IPN hydrogels as biomaterials for bioprinting. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[36]  S. Yoo,et al.  Chemical modulation of M13 bacteriophage and its functional opportunities for nanomedicine , 2014, International journal of nanomedicine.

[37]  GeunHyung Kim,et al.  A mini-review: Cell response to microscale, nanoscale, and hierarchical patterning of surface structure. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[38]  Chuanbin Mao,et al.  Controlled growth and differentiation of MSCs on grooved films assembled from monodisperse biological nanofibers with genetically tunable surface chemistries. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[39]  Y. Chiang,et al.  Virus-Enabled Synthesis and Assembly of Nanowires for Lithium Ion Battery Electrodes , 2006, Science.

[40]  Ying Mei,et al.  Engineering alginate as bioink for bioprinting. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[41]  Alexander Hexemer,et al.  Biomimetic self-templating supramolecular structures , 2011, Nature.

[42]  Ye Zhu,et al.  Phage Nanofibers Induce Vascularized Osteogenesis in 3D Printed Bone Scaffolds , 2014, Advanced materials.

[43]  Patries M Herst,et al.  Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction. , 2005, Biotechnology annual review.

[44]  Deok‐Ho Kim,et al.  Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink , 2014, Nature Communications.

[45]  Johnson H. Y. Chung,et al.  Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells. , 2013, Biomaterials science.

[46]  Alexandra L. Rutz,et al.  A Multimaterial Bioink Method for 3D Printing Tunable, Cell‐Compatible Hydrogels , 2015, Advanced materials.

[47]  Ramamoorthy Ramesh,et al.  Virus-based piezoelectric energy generation. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[48]  Cholesteric Phase in Virus Suspensions , 2000, cond-mat/0003434.

[49]  Hyo-Eon Jin,et al.  Collagen mimetic peptide engineered M13 bacteriophage for collagen targeting and imaging in cancer. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[50]  Hyeongjin Lee,et al.  A direct cell printing supplemented with low-temperature processing method for obtaining highly porous three-dimensional cell-laden scaffolds. , 2014, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[51]  Chuanbin Mao,et al.  Bacteriophage Bundles with Pre-Aligned Ca Initiate the Oriented Nucleation and Growth of Hydroxylapatite. , 2010, Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society.