Micromechanics in the theory of cochlear mechanics

Abstract The consensus of empirical data suggests that the shear motion between the tectorial membrane and the reticular lamina, which is believed to control the stimulation of the hair cells, is more sharply tuned than the transversal vibration of the basilar membrane. Interaction between the length of basilar-membrane waves and the longitudinal coupling within the tectorial membrane may contribute to the required sharpening. However, such a mechanism is unlikely to be sufficient, acting alone. Simple calculations indicate that damping of the tectorial membrane coupled viscoelastically to the organ of Corti is low enough to allow the system to exhibit local radial responses above about 150 Hz. Some effects of such resonances are illustrated by means of simple mechanical models. In particular, it is demonstrated that radial vibration of the tectorial membrane nearly at right angles to the transversal vibration of the basilar membrane constitutes an inherently nonlinear system. The radial vibration can produce strong loading of the basilar membrane, affecting its tuning and introducing nonlinearities. Nonlinear longitudinal coupling within the tectorial membrane, if present, can produce quadratic and cubic distortion products and strong two-tone suppression by second tones at frequencies above and below the resonance frequency. Such a coupling is suggested by the finding that, in the alligator lizard, the part of auditory papilla endowed with a tectorial membrane produces both effects, but the part not so endowed does not.

[1]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Some observations on cochlear mechanics. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M J Mulroy,et al.  Intracellular responses to acoustic clicks in the inner ear of the alligator lizard. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  P. Sellick,et al.  Tuning properties of cochlear hair cells , 1977, Nature.

[4]  Two-tone rate suppression in lizard cochlear nerve fibers, relation to receptor organ morphology , 1978, Brain Research.

[5]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. J. Mulroy Cochlear anatomy of the alligator lizard. , 1974, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[7]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. J. Zwislocki,et al.  Theory of cochlear mechanics , 1980, Hearing Research.

[9]  M. Sachs Stimulus-response relation for auditory-noise fibers: two-tone stimuli. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  P M Sellick,et al.  Intracellular studies of hair cells in the mammalian cochlea. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  R. G. Turner,et al.  Tuning of single fibers in the cochlear nerve of the alligator lizard: Relation to receptor morphology , 1976, Brain Research.

[12]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Basilar-membrane motion in the alligator lizard: its relation to tonotopic organization and frequency selectivity. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Jozef J. Zwislocki Five decades of research on cochlear mechanics , 1979 .

[14]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.